Sponsored Content
Special Forums IP Networking Wireshark UDP checksum bad checksum Post 302627711 by AustinCann on Saturday 21st of April 2012 11:12:49 AM
Old 04-21-2012
Wireshark UDP checksum bad checksum

Hello

I am communicating with two devices using my computer over UDP protocol. The application is running fine. When I monitored the UDP traffic using Wireshark software, I found that there were too many Checksum errors.

Please find attached the png file showing this error. I am about to deliver the solution to the customer and have full confidence that the communication is ok. I have however little knowledge in the field of networking.

Any comments on these checksum errors will help me put a strong technical report to the customer.

Kind Regards
Austin Cann
Wireshark UDP checksum bad checksum-header-checksum-errorpng
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. SCO

checksum

Does anyone know the answer to this? When I run "sum -r" on a file that I've down loaded from the sco website, the 1st set of numbers differs from the checksum on the download page but the 2nd set matches. If I try to install the patch, I get errors. Anyone has an answer? (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: jn5519
3 Replies

2. Programming

UDP File Transfer Validation and Checksum

Dear All I have written a client server program for file transmission from one system to other using UDP. Can i use the cksum number in the udp header to validate if the received packet is corrupted or not? If yes, how can i extract the header and validate it.. Also is there any way that... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: iamcollins
3 Replies

3. Solaris

checksum

Anyone can tell me the different between "cksum" and "sum" command on Solaris? I read the man pages but still not get it. And how to display the md5 checksum for a file. Thanks, (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: redstone
1 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Extracting the checksum

I wanted a script that can give the checksum of a particular zipped file. Can somebody help me in writing a shell script in getting the checksum of a particular tar file. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: vkca
1 Replies

5. Programming

UDP Checksum problem

Hello sir,, i m doing network programming in C could u plzz let me know...at the time of udp checksum calculation does htons() or ntohs() play some role..?? i mean will there be any difference if some values are added in network form and other is in the host form... Thnx 4 ur time.. ... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: nirucool89
4 Replies

6. Hardware

Bad BIOS Checksum

Hi All, I installed Ubuntu10.04LTS after using it for some day , a problem started ,at system boot time error is coming Bad BIOS checksum.Starting BIOS recovery. checking for floppy.checking for CD is coming repeatedly but system is not cuming up. After sometime output was also not... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: arvindk.monu
0 Replies

7. SCO

Bad Checksum, Installed Mini tape on floppy controller

I'm on SCO 5.07. Just installed mini tape. Getting CMOS/GPNV checksum error when I turn on the machine and have to go into bios. I just hit f10 and I continue. When loading SCO and it get to the mini tape I get Warning: SCSI boot options ignored: Bad paremeter count. It's a QIC 80. When in bios if... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Mike Gomes
2 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Checksum+SFTP

Hi ALL, I use solaris OS and SFTP to get/put files from remote server.I use the below command , sftp user@host<<EOF cd "dir" get --checksum "filename" EOF I am getting a strange error as " get --checksum INVALID paramter". It has been working succesfully since last 3 years but all of a... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: mohanpadamata
1 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

FTP and Checksum

Hi Guys, Sometimes, I have a problem with transferred files in ftp session. Thats why I want to produce checksum value in my local server and remote server. But I could not find anyway to produce checksum value of transferred files in remote server. Do you have any idea? Thanks, Emre (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: ce_emre21
3 Replies

10. Solaris

md5 checksum what does it do

Hello good people, I came across md5 checksum. Can anyone please explain to me what it does and if possible an example of how to use it? Thank you very much (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: cjashu
1 Replies
UDPLITE(7)						     Linux Programmer's Manual							UDPLITE(7)

NAME
udplite - Lightweight User Datagram Protocol SYNOPSIS
#include <sys/socket.h> sockfd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_UDPLITE); DESCRIPTION
This is an implementation of the Lightweight User Datagram Protocol (UDP-Lite), as described in RFC 3828. UDP-Lite is an extension of UDP (RFC 768) to support variable-length checksums. This has advantages for some types of multimedia transport that may be able to make use of slightly damaged datagrams, rather than having them discarded by lower-layer protocols. The variable-length checksum coverage is set via a setsockopt(2) option. If this option is not set, the only difference to UDP is in using a different IP protocol identifier (IANA number 136). The UDP-Lite implementation is a full extension of udp(7), i.e., it shares the same API and API behaviour, and in addition offers two socket options to control the checksum coverage. Address format UDP-Litev4 uses the sockaddr_in address format described in ip(7). UDP-Litev6 uses the sockaddr_in6 address format described in ipv6(7). Socket options To set or get a UDP-Lite socket option, call getsockopt(2) to read or setsockopt(2) to write the option with the option level argument set to IPPROTO_UDPLITE. In addition, all IPPROTO_UDP socket options are valid on a UDP-Lite socket. See udp(7) for more information. The following two options are specific to UDP-Lite. UDPLITE_SEND_CSCOV This option sets the sender checksum coverage and takes an int as argument, with a checksum coverage value in the range 0..2^16-1. A value of 0 means that the entire datagram is always covered. Values from 1-7 are illegal (RFC 3828, 3.1) and are rounded up to the minimum coverage of 8. With regard to IPv6 jumbograms (RFC 2675), the UDP-Litev6 checksum coverage is limited to the first 2^16-1 octets, as per RFC 3828, 3.5. Higher values are therefore silently truncated to 2^16-1. If in doubt, the current coverage value can always be queried using getsockopt(2). UDPLITE_RECV_CSCOV This is the receiver-side analogue and uses the same argument format and value range as UDPLITE_SEND_CSCOV. This option is not required to enable traffic with partial checksum coverage. Its function is that of a traffic filter: when enabled, it instructs the kernel to drop all packets which have a coverage less than the specified coverage value. When the value of UDPLITE_RECV_CSCOV exceeds the actual packet coverage, incoming packets are silently dropped, but may generate a warning message in the system log. ERRORS
All errors documented for udp(7) may be returned. UDP-Lite does not add further errors. FILES
/proc/net/snmp - basic UDP-Litev4 statistics counters. /proc/net/snmp6 - basic UDP-Litev6 statistics counters. VERSIONS
UDP-Litev4/v6 first appeared in Linux 2.6.20. BUGS
Where glibc support is missing, the following definitions are needed: #define IPPROTO_UDPLITE 136 #define UDPLITE_SEND_CSCOV 10 #define UDPLITE_RECV_CSCOV 11 SEE ALSO
ip(7), ipv6(7), socket(7), udp(7) RFC 3828 for the Lightweight User Datagram Protocol (UDP-Lite). Documentation/networking/udplite.txt in the Linux kernel source tree COLOPHON
This page is part of release 3.55 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, and information about reporting bugs, can be found at http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/. Linux 2008-12-03 UDPLITE(7)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:59 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy