Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: ulimit -n
Operating Systems Linux ulimit -n Post 302604544 by mark54g on Monday 5th of March 2012 10:06:02 AM
Old 03-05-2012
If you download that file and re-upload it, you can totally hose your system if you do not ensure it is a UNIX file and not a Windows file when it returns.

Edit the file on the server in place. NEVER do what you have just done.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

ulimit -d

All I am trying to do ulimit -d unlimited and I get "sh: ulimit: The specified value exceeds the user's allowable limit." Can someone please help me understand, how to change this! Thanks (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: adadevil
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

ulimit

Hi, system aix 4.3 when I execute umilit i get result "unlimited". why cant i ftp or extract from media filesize over 2gig.... e.g FS /test/testy is large file enabled. any help will be greatly appreciated. thnx (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Student37
3 Replies

3. Solaris

ulimit

Hi, I need to increase the open files on my server to run a test. Usually what I do is: ulimit -n 5000 My questions are: 1] I want to set this parameter once and for all. What is the right parameter to set in /etc/system: rlim_fd_max or rlim_fd_cur? 2] How to make sure that this... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: melanie_pfefer
1 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

ulimit

hi what is the difference between file and data? if file is unlimited, does that mean we can have a file as big as we like? thanks. file(blocks) unlimited data(kbytes) 1048576 (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: JamesByars
6 Replies

5. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

ulimit nofiles

Hi, We have an AIX system on oslevel 5.2 and we have the current limits set for the user "XXX" time(seconds) unlimited file(blocks) unlimited data(kbytes) 1024000 stack(kbytes) 32768 memory(kbytes) unlimited coredump(blocks) 2097151... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: jerardfjay
4 Replies

6. SCO

problem with ulimit

hi, i cant set ULIMIT for normal user (file size more than 2gb).but in root user it is working fine.in user it is giving error like "limit exceeded (priviledged user)". (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: prakrithi
2 Replies

7. HP-UX

ulimit -c unlimited

Hi, I want to set the coredump to unlimited, but it seems it does not work. > ulimit -a time(seconds) unlimited file(blocks) unlimited data(kbytes) 1048576 stack(kbytes) 131072 memory(kbytes) unlimited coredump(blocks) 4194303... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: mr_andrew
1 Replies

8. Solaris

ulimit

how do i check the ulimit set on my server.. ca i know whats the command ?? thanks in advance .. (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: expert
5 Replies

9. AIX

nofiles in ulimit

Hi all, What are the nofiles in ulimit for? How can these affect the server performance? What are the desired values for this? below is the result of ulimit -a on the server. time(seconds) unlimited file(blocks) unlimited data(kbytes) unlimited stack(kbytes) ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: guzzelle
1 Replies

10. Solaris

ulimit

Hello, could you help me please? I write in command line: "ulimit 500" -> i've set the max size of 512-bytes blocks that i can write in one file. But when after it i use ulimit.3c in my program: "ulimit(UL_GETFSIZE);" the result turns out 1000. Why is it so? They always differ so that one is... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Zhenya_
2 Replies
SOCKDOWN(1)						      General Commands Manual						       SOCKDOWN(1)

NAME
sockdown - shutdown(2) a socket netpipes 4.2 SYNOPSIS
sockdown [ fd [how] ] DESCRIPTION
sockdown performs the shutdown(2) system call on one of its file descriptors specified by fd. The possible values for how are +----------+---------------------------------------------------------+ |writeonly | convert to write-only file descriptor | |0 | convert to write-only file descriptor | |writeonly | symbolic for same as above | |1 | convert to read-only file descriptor | |readonly | symbolic for same as above | |2 | complete shutdown. no more reads or writes are allowed | |totally | symbolic for same as above | +----------+---------------------------------------------------------+ The default fd is 1 (stdout) and the default how is 1. EXAMPLES
Imagine you have a machine that can perform a service (in this case conversion from ASCII to fancy postscript) : server$ faucet 3000 --in --out enscript -2rGhp - You may then connect to it with a hose. However, the first example enters deadlock : client$ hose server 3000 -in -out sh -c " cat blah.txt & cat > blah.ps " The enscript blocks waiting for input from the socket because not all of the client processes have exited. While the cat blah.txt is fin- ished, the cat > blah.ps is not, and will not be finished until the remote enscript process finishes writing. The enscript process will not finish writing until it is finished reading, but that client->server half of the socket is still open and will not be closed until all the client processes are done. The result is deadlock. So, we use sockdown to close half of the pipe client$ hose server 3000 -in -out sh -c " ( cat blah.txt ; sockdown ) & cat > blah.ps " This way when the cat blah.txt is done, half of the socket is shut down and the remote enscript process runs out of input, causing it to flush its output and exit, so eventually the whole mess finishes cleanly. Note: the & on the hose is necessary to prevent another deadlock. If we simply used the ; to serialize the two cat processes it is possi- ble that the enscript would fill up its write buffer before the first cat was done causing both processes to block and preventing the sec- ond cat from draining the pipe. Of course, that idiomatic usage of hose is so useful that it is a special form: client$ hose server 3000 -slave < blah.txt > blah.ps Ian Stirling <root@mauve.demon.co.uk> informs me that sockdown can be used in Linux's /proc/pid/fd/ directories to tear down hung network connections. I have since used this myself on a wedged MOMspider. To try this, you have to know the PID of the program and the file descriptor of the wedged socket (can sometimes be found by running strace and see if the program is stuck in a read(2) system call). If the PID is 991 and the socket's descriptor is 5, you do this as root: bash# sockdown 1 2 > /proc/991/fd/5 ERRORS
Socket operation on non-socket Invalid argument (seen on Solaris) The fd you specified does not refer to a socket. This happens when you run sockdown by itself (it is unlikely that any of the file descriptors attached to an interactive shell are actually sockets) or if you goof up your faucet/hose command and forgot to dup(2) one of your descriptors. Bad file number You gave it a bad file number for fd. If you have enough skill to actually generate this error, you probably know what is wrong. If you encounter any other errors, clue me in. SEE ALSO
netpipes (1) faucet (1), hose (1), getpeername (1), socket (2), shutdown (2), NOTES
Any normal human would assume a program this simple has to be bug free, but I am an experienced programmer. Just avoid doing anything funky like passing sockdown strings and it should serve you well. You should not have to pass it any arguments unless you are doing something fairly funky. Perhaps I should ditch the shutdown -a semantics on hose since a sockdown 1 2 would do the job. CREDITS
Ian Stirling <root@mauve.demon.co.uk>, for the idea of using this program in /proc on a Linux machine. COPYRIGHT
Copyright (C) 1995-1998 Robert Forsman This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MER- CHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. AUTHOR
Robert Forsman thoth@purplefrog.com Purple Frog Software http://web.purplefrog.com/~thoth/ July 7, 1998 SOCKDOWN(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:15 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy