Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Routing issue - local vs LAN
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers Routing issue - local vs LAN Post 302604027 by Corona688 on Friday 2nd of March 2012 02:57:02 PM
Old 03-02-2012
It's easily possible to put more than one IP address into a single adapter.

Code:
ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig eth0:1 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0

It's possible you did this instead of putting them on your different adaptors.

Without seeing what your configuration actually is it's very difficult to say.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Routing between two LAN

Here's the problem. I got one network with a internett connection (2mbit). In this network there's 5 computers connected together with a hub. The other network is also with 5 computers. I'm just wondering if I could connect these networks together. But the one network should not get access to the... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Dark_Duck
1 Replies

2. AIX

AIX Routing Issue

Hello, I've moved to a new network with multiple AIX box's. Most of them are working fine and dandy. On one box I need to set up a static route to a gateway.. no problem right? Whenever I add the route it appears in the routing table as UGc and then begins adding new entries to the... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: joshstar14
1 Replies

3. IP Networking

IP - Routing issue?

I have an IP routing issue or I am just to stupid to work it out myself. I have setup am old PC running SUSE Linux 11.3 as a router, the system has 3 Interfaces connecting 3 networks. Interface 1 = 10.164.2.161/21 Interface 2 = 192.168.1.210/24 Interface 3 = 30.1.0.11/16 The default... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: hogola
6 Replies

4. Solaris

Lan Issue

Hi Mates, I have one problem connecting a solaris machine to winxp machine. Setup:- Solaris 10 OS Virtual machine - on VMWARE (Ip Address:- 192.168.10.3). WINXP SP2 is the base os. (Ip Address:- 192.168.10.2). Bothe machines are connected using a bridge networking VMnet1. When i ping... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: satyajeet.kadam
1 Replies

5. IP Networking

Need help with a routing issue.

I have run into a wall troubleshooting a Centos 5 networking issue. Hoping someone can assist. I've got a box with two vlans trunked over bond0 bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:22:64:C1:D6:60 inet6 addr: fe80::222:64ff:fec1:d660/64 Scope:Link ... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: creedog
0 Replies

6. IP Networking

Ubuntu LAN connectivity issue

System: Dell Desktop w/ 2 SATA drives running Ubuntu 9.10 that uses 2 ethernet cards, 1 for internet connectivity and another to interface the machine with a high voltage power supply which supports ssh and EPICS controls. Second Ethernet card is connected to a NetGear WNR3500 router, the VME... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: henslewm
0 Replies

7. IP Networking

Local Lan, no-ip directed DNS forward, surf within lan

Hi, We have a website running on a local centos 5.4 surfer, static IP. The domain.com uses no-ip.com to take care of the DNS, it forwards all to my server. My router receives the port 80 call, routes it to my server and the world can see domain.com perfectly fine. However, we cannot see... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: lawstudent
3 Replies

8. IP Networking

Routing traffic problem between 3G and Office Lan Network

Hi, I would like to ask some networking solution regarding my work LAN and 3G usb network problem. I want to route my internet traffic to the 3G network and sometimes connect to some of my work network for ssh to configure some workstation or print something. Currently my problem is i can't... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: jao_madn
0 Replies

9. Solaris

Routing Issue

we are not able to ping client server (falcon-ebr.sbms.bsc.com) from netbackup master server (135.179.96.122 tsprd-ebr.edc.single.net) However from client server we are able to ping the master Server. Please assist on this (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Rahul466
1 Replies

10. Cybersecurity

iptables Local Lan Issues

I recently installed Centos 6 and is my SOHO firewall/router. The small network is layout like such: |--eth0(WAN) Centos 6(firewall/router) |---eth1(LAN) | Switch | | LAN(192.168.3.0/27) | | PCs ----Laptops---Printer... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: metallica1973
8 Replies
NOS-TUN(8)						    BSD System Manager's Manual 						NOS-TUN(8)

NAME
nos-tun -- implement ``nos'' or ``ka9q'' style IP over IP tunnel SYNOPSIS
nos-tun -t tunnel -s source -d destination -p protocol_number [source] target DESCRIPTION
The nos-tun utility is used to establish an nos style tunnel, (also known as ka9q or IP-IP tunnel) using a tun(4) kernel interface. Tunnel is the name of the tunnel device /dev/tun0 for example. Source and destination are the addresses used on the tunnel device. If you configure the tunnel against a cisco router, use a netmask of ``255.255.255.252'' on the cisco. This is because the tunnel is a point-to-point interface in the FreeBSD end, a concept cisco does not really implement. Protocol number sets tunnel mode. Original KA9Q NOS uses 94 but many people use 4 on the worldwide backbone of ampr.org. Target is the address of the remote tunnel device, this must match the source address set on the remote end. EXAMPLES
This end, a FreeBSD box on address 192.168.59.34: nos-tun -t /dev/tun0 -s 192.168.61.1 -d 192.168.61.2 192.168.56.45 Remote cisco on address 192.168.56.45: interface tunnel 0 ip address 192.168.61.2 255.255.255.252 tunnel mode nos tunnel destination 192.168.59.34 tunnel source 192.168.56.45 AUTHORS
Nickolay N. Dudorov <nnd@itfs.nsk.su> wrote the program, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> wrote the man-page. Isao SEKI <iseki@gongon.com> added a new flag, IP protocol number. BUGS
We do not allow for setting our source address for multihomed machines. BSD
April 11, 1998 BSD
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:34 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy