02-16-2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cowLips
the at&t domain seems quirky non professional and could very well be a hoax.
who knows.
thanks
It's not a hoax. If it makes you feel better you can walk through the layers starting at the main research site:
http://research.att.com (It's under portfolio/software tools/ast)
Just thought I'd save you the effort; next time I won't bother.
Last edited by agama; 02-16-2012 at 12:11 AM..
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions
Lately I've been trying to fix a 1991 Packard Bell, it's been running fine, but it's eating my memory for fun and taking away my pages. Is it worth my time trying to fix it, and is it possible to put new programs on it? thank you (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: Saz43
9 Replies
2. Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions
Hi, In my MSDOS version on windows'98, many keys are not working. I feel that my version is old and I wnt to update it. Can anyone tell me how can i do so.
Please tell me soon.
Thanks a lot.
-Kinnaree
:confused: (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: kinnaree
1 Replies
3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
I know nothing of unix and didn't know where to start. I've heard of a DOS to Unix translator, and since I know DOS pretty well, I thought that this program would be perfect. Any help you could give me would be appreciated.
Bryan (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: bferguson
1 Replies
4. Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions
I had just recently experienced, a bad experience... Apperently, a worm got into my computer a created itself in my MS-DOS. No serious damage was done, but I did a little study on it, through my computer. The virus got thought my scan, by coding itself as an HTML file. Don't know why it did that,... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: hdk_mkr
2 Replies
5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
I have navigated every DOS and UNIX FAQ to find the DOS equivalent of the UNIX ps command (ps -f would be even better) but all listings of DOS<>UNIX commands do not have it (they all have the same basic commands listed). DOS must have a way of detecting running processes and TSRs. mem /c is the... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: dancingfool
7 Replies
6. Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions
Please where can i get the origanal MS-DOS, I need it.
Not mandatory but botting from a floppy is best. (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: Irish Jimmy
9 Replies
7. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hi
I have a dos batch file in window server where I call a cmd command for creating some db.
this cmd commad is located in e:\data\abcd\xyz.cmd.
Now I call this batch file from unix ssh.sh but my access point is D in window server here I want to change the dos prompt to e:\data\abcd.
in... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Jamil Qadir
3 Replies
8. Linux
Hello ;
I have a problem running some script on dos .
when i run :
C: ls /temp
ls: cannot access /temp: No such file or directory
but when i run
C: ls \temp
windriver backup remotebackup
also when i run
C: ls temp
windriver backup remotebackup
The... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: mulder20
4 Replies
9. Linux
Dear all, I am trying to write a unix shell with C++ that is similar to Windows command line. I planned to call it Dosh (DOS-sHell).That means you can directly run dos or win32 console programs with it. It will be distributed according to the license g GPL. Any advice? (This is my first c++ program... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: elgarteo95
3 Replies
10. Cybersecurity
About 3 days ago our Apache logs started filling with the following errors:
mod_ssl: SSL handshake failed (server <weberver>:443, client 41.235.234.172) (OpenSSL library error follows)
OpenSSL: error:1408A0B7:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:no ciphers specified
These initially were... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: ccj4467
1 Replies
LEARN ABOUT SUSE
uri::url
URI::URL(3) User Contributed Perl Documentation URI::URL(3)
NAME
URI::URL - Uniform Resource Locators
SYNOPSIS
$u1 = URI::URL->new($str, $base);
$u2 = $u1->abs;
DESCRIPTION
This module is provided for backwards compatibility with modules that depend on the interface provided by the "URI::URL" class that used to
be distributed with the libwww-perl library.
The following differences exist compared to the "URI" class interface:
o The URI::URL module exports the url() function as an alternate constructor interface.
o The constructor takes an optional $base argument. The "URI::URL" class is a subclass of "URI::WithBase".
o The URI::URL->newlocal class method is the same as URI::file->new_abs.
o URI::URL::strict(1)
o $url->print_on method
o $url->crack method
o $url->full_path: same as ($uri->abs_path || "/")
o $url->netloc: same as $uri->authority
o $url->epath, $url->equery: same as $uri->path, $uri->query
o $url->path and $url->query pass unescaped strings.
o $url->path_components: same as $uri->path_segments (if you don't consider path segment parameters)
o $url->params and $url->eparams methods
o $url->base method. See URI::WithBase.
o $url->abs and $url->rel have an optional $base argument. See URI::WithBase.
o $url->frag: same as $uri->fragment
o $url->keywords: same as $uri->query_keywords
o $url->localpath and friends map to $uri->file.
o $url->address and $url->encoded822addr: same as $uri->to for mailto URI
o $url->groupart method for news URI
o $url->article: same as $uri->message
SEE ALSO
URI, URI::WithBase
COPYRIGHT
Copyright 1998-2000 Gisle Aas.
perl v5.12.1 2008-04-04 URI::URL(3)