Sponsored Content
Top Forums Programming Learning OS design, Linux Vs. Minix??? Post 302598427 by jlliagre on Tuesday 14th of February 2012 11:37:53 AM
Old 02-14-2012
While certainly a confidential Unix variant, Minix is neither obsolete (last versions were released in October 2010) nor 16 bit (it can be compiled in 16 or 32 bit).

Quoting Andy Tanenbaum:
Please be aware that MINIX 3 is not your grandfather's MINIX ... MINIX 1 was written as an educational tool ... MINIX 3 is that plus a start at building a highly reliable, self-healing, bloat-free operating system ... MINIX 1 and MINIX 3 are related in the same way as Windows 3.1 and Windows XP are: same first name.

Last edited by jlliagre; 02-14-2012 at 05:34 PM.. Reason: typo
 

8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Learning Unix & Linux

I'm new to Unix. I'm just looking for really good unix documents through Internet as pdf format on programming in all shells, and system adminstrator documents, and well as just all around really good documents on unix. Thank you (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: faaarin
5 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Learning Unix/Linux from the Start?

I was wondering if someone could tell me where I could learn everything about Unix/Linux and I was also wondering what the differance between Unix and Linux was :confused: Ive never used it, never seen it.. But Im interested in learning :D (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Vallzi
3 Replies

3. Solaris

AIX, Solaris, Linux Test Environment Design Question

AIX, Solaris, Linux Test Environment Design Question We want to set an AIX, Solaris & Linux test environment. Here are the hardware equipments: (1) A Sunfire v100 (or v120), 1GB memory, two 36GB HDD. (2) An IBM pSeries 7026, 1 GB memory, 4 9GB HDD. (3) Five external HDD with SCSI... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: aixlover
4 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

AIX, Solaris, Linux Test Environment Design Question

AIX, Solaris, Linux Test Environment Design Question We want to set an AIX, Solaris & Linux test environment. Here are the hardware equipments: (1) A Sunfire v100 (or v120), 1GB memory, two 36GB HDD. (2) An IBM pSeries 7026, 1 GB memory, 4 9GB HDD. (3) Five external HDD with SCSI... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: aixlover
1 Replies

5. Linux

which linux is best for learning unix?

I have just installed Ubuntu because I need a linux system asap and Ubuntu seems to be easiest for that. But I plan on installing some other Linux distro's for a while (maybe on virtualBox too) so i can understand the inner workings of linux and especially more about unix. I know that alot of the... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: fuzzylogic25
11 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

Learning abt Linux OS

hi guys, i got job recently in a company which provide a product for data backup and data recovery... as dis product is wrriten in c++ am workin in c++.. now am under training and i want to learn abt Operating System concepts and OS programming using c and c++. i know basic c and c++ programming... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: senthil.march
0 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Setting up a home network for learning Linux

I am working on learning Linux, and somebody suggested setting up Linux on a separate computer, and searching for answers to whatever may be needed, on a different computer plugged in to the Internet. I have a Windows 7 PC, plugged in to a cable modem, and an old notebook, Compaq Presario R3000... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: AdultFoundry
5 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Learning to Script in Linux

Hello, I'm trying to branch out and learn Linux, but my comfort zone is PowerShell. I figure the best way to learn it is to do it so I moved my Plex Media Server to Ubuntu Server. What I'm trying to do is build a script that searches a directory and all subdirectories for files with the .ts... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: Rhysers
5 Replies
PART(8) 						      System Manager's Manual							   PART(8)

NAME
part - partition table editor SYNOPSIS
part [device] ... DESCRIPTION
Part is a screen oriented partition table editor. While editing you will see six lines of numbers, the first line shows the device name and its geometry (number of cylinders, heads and sec- tors), the second shows the start and end of the drive or partition you are working on, the last four lines show the different partitions or subpartitions. All numbers except those on the second line can be edited. Question marks are showed instead of numbers if the parti- tion table is not loaded yet. You have to select a device and type 'r'. Editing is a simple matter of moving around with the arrow keys and changing the values with + and - (or PgUp and PgDn), or by typing the desired value. The '?' key will give a small list of commands, the '!' key gives advice on how to make a new entry. The spacebar toggles between showing the size of the partition and the last sector on the partition. Useful to check if a partition is adjacent to the next. The 'm' key is "magical", it lets you cycle through a set of interesting values for the base or size of a partition. These values are: Aligned to a cylinder, taped to other partitions (inside or outside), or filling out holes. Use this key! Minix subpartition tables or extended partitions may be edited after hitting the '>' key. The number of this partition will be shown after the device name on the second row, e.g. /dev/hd0:2. Minix subpartition tables are shown as is, but extended partition bases are trans- lated to absolute offsets on the screen to hide the gory details of their implementation from the innocent user. (Hit 'p' if you dare.) The '<' key will bring you back to the enclosing partition table. With arguments, part will use the given devices or files. Without arguments, part will use all interesting block devices in /dev sorted by device number and starting with /dev/hd0. Values that are out of range, overlapping, or otherwise strange are shown in reverse video. Values that may possibly be a problem for operating systems other then Minix are shown in bold characters. The name of the device is highlighted when it has not been read yet. Head or sector numbers are highlighted if the partition does not start or end at a cylinder boundary. The base and/or size field is highlighted if they fall outside the device, if they are inside some other partition, if the base equals the device's base (no room for the boot sector), or if the size is zero. Part complies with the good old UNIX tradition of trusting the user. It will write any table, no matter how bad. You have been warned. By the way, as far as Minix is concerned there is absolutely no reason to make partitions start precisely on a cylinder or track nor does it have to be an exact number of cylinders long. Minix only looks at the base and size of a partition, the geometry of the drive doesn't have to be correct. Other Operating systems can be very picky about partitions that are not aligned. Some partition editors may refuse to edit a table, others may even make a mess of the table. The only exception is the first partition, it traditionally starts on the first track, not the first cylinder. All editors must understand this. (Subpartition tables are Minix specific, so there is no reason at all for any alignment.) Extended Partitions Extended partitions are a mess that is only made slightly better by part by translating the base offsets to absolute numbers. It is better to use DOS fdisk to create them, but if you insist on using part then this is what they should look like: The extended partition entry in the primary partition table must cover the whole logical partition space within it. The area thus created is split in segments, each segment contains a partition table in sector 0 and one (just one) logical parti- tion. The first entry of a segment's partition table describes this logical partition: it's partition ID, base and size. The second entry is an extended partition that describes base and size of the next segment (partition table and logical partition). The last segment's partition table is empty, or contains one logical partition. SEE ALSO
fd(4), hd(4). BUGS
You can have a table read, messed up, and written in no time, be careful. You can't type head or sector numbers directly. Sectors are counted from 0 for consistency, but the partition table counts from 1 like DOS addresses them. Most confusing. You can't write a backup copy to a file, that's what dd(1) with count=1 is for. AUTHOR
Kees J. Bot (kjb@cs.vu.nl) PART(8)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:53 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy