Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users ipf/ipnat NAT/port forward issues Post 302598173 by spakov on Monday 13th of February 2012 04:14:59 PM
Old 02-13-2012
That has nothing to do with ipf nor ipnat, and you're talking about Linux, not Solaris. You should start a new thread.

Last edited by jim mcnamara; 02-13-2012 at 06:20 PM.. Reason: post removed
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. IP Networking

NAT Packets/Port Openine

Firstly, I have no knowledge of hubs, so please keep any advice simple! I have a UNIX hub, connecting three PCs and would like to know if the hub has NAT translation for incoming packets and if th hub is able to NAT translate packets coming in to a local (internal) LAN address.. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: MartinD
3 Replies

2. IP Networking

Destination NAT using ipnat in Solaris 8

Hello People, Please can someone help me with destination IP address NAT and Port transalation using ipnat in Solaris 8. Scenario: Box A(192.168.100.1/24) and Box B (192.168.100.50/24) are connected phyically and logically(vlan) on the same network switch. Box A hosts an... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: mandarawachat
0 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

ssh port forward over three server

Hello there, I have a big problem, and I hope somebody can help me. I try to realize a port forward over three server. Here is a picture... Client Server1 | Server2 ------- ------- | ------- |...... | |...... | | |...... ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Art007
2 Replies

4. Cybersecurity

IPF pass in connection to port 21 even with no explicit rule

I'm running IPF on solaris 10 bash-3.00# ipf -V #display ipf version ipf: IP Filter: v4.1.9 (592) Kernel: IP Filter: v4.1.9 Running: yes Log Flags: 0 = none set Default: pass all, Logging: available Active list: 1 Feature mask: 0x107 with the following rules bash-3.00# ipfstat -o -i... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: h@foorsa.biz
0 Replies

5. Solaris

Solaris 11 Express NAT performance issues

Hi all, I decided to replace my linux router/firewall with Solaris 11 express. This is a pppoe connection directly to my server...no router boxes. I got everything setup, but the performance is terrible on the NAT....really slow. A web page that loads on the server instantly will take... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: vectox
3 Replies

6. IP Networking

iptables forward public IP, no NAT, Debian i386

Hello all, got kinda problem. Have two machines in LAN, one of them connected to Internet directly, another one must be forwarded through the first one. Masquerading works perfectly, but is not what is needed here. Both machines have public IP addresses, when the second machine is forwarded its... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Action
0 Replies

7. Debian

Iptables Nat forward port 29070

Hello, the Nat and the forward worked on my debian server up to the reboot of machines. The following rules*: /sbin/iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i eth2 -d xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx --dport 29070 -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.1.7:29070 /sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth2 -o eth0 -d... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: titoms
0 Replies

8. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Issues with sort and forward slash

I have some directories I am trying to sort. When I attempt to sort them and they are in this format, everything works great: file /vol/trees10 /vol/trees2 /vol/trees7 cat file |sort -ts -k2 -n /vol/trees2 /vol/trees7 /vol/trees10 This makes thefiles in the order... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: newbie2010
9 Replies

9. IP Networking

Debugging NAT / prerouting issues (iptables)

Hello, Recently I discovered an issue with packet routing in the latest Android releases (4.4+ KitKat & Lollipop). It seems that the problem Android specific, but essentially it comes from the Linux kernel. I already filed a bug report to Google. You can see the details by searching for... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Vladislav
0 Replies

10. Red Hat

Port Forward to VPN client.

Hi all, I can't port forward from WAN to VPN Client. VPN Client Ubuntu 18 192.168.0.16 Port 6000 VPN Gateway for LAN clients Centos 192.168.0.12 Router 192.168.0.1 I can forward to the VPN Client if VPN is not connected if I forward Port 6000 from 192.168.0.1 directly to 192.168.0.16.... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: stinkefisch
2 Replies
IPFS(8) 						      System Manager's Manual							   IPFS(8)

NAME
ipfs - saves and restores information for NAT and state tables. SYNOPSIS
ipfs [-nv] -l ipfs [-nv] -u ipfs [-nv] [ -d <dirname> ] -R ipfs [-nv] [ -d <dirname> ] -W ipfs [-nNSv] [ -f <filename> ] -r ipfs [-nNSv] [ -f <filename> ] -w ipfs [-nNSv] -f <filename> -i <if1>,<if2> DESCRIPTION
ipfs allows state information created for NAT entries and rules using keep state to be locked (modification prevented) and then saved to disk, allowing for the system to experience a reboot, followed by the restoration of that information, resulting in connections not being interrupted. OPTIONS
-d Change the default directory used with -R and -W options for saving state information. -n Don't actually take any action that would affect information stored in the kernel or on disk. -v Provides a verbose description of what's being done. -i <ifname1>,<ifname2> Change all instances of interface name ifname1 in the state save file to ifname2. Useful if you're restoring state information after a hardware reconfiguration or change. -N Operate on NAT information. -S Operate on filtering state information. -u Unlock state tables in the kernel. -l Lock state tables in the kernel. -r Read information in from the specified file and load it into the kernel. This requires the state tables to have already been locked and does not change the lock once complete. -w Write information out to the specified file and from the kernel. This requires the state tables to have already been locked and does not change the lock once complete. -R Restores all saved state information, if any, from two files, ipstate.ipf and ipnat.ipf, stored in the /var/db/ipf directory unless otherwise specified by the -d option. The state tables are locked at the beginning of this operation and unlocked once complete. -W Saves in-kernel state information, if any, out to two files, ipstate.ipf and ipnat.ipf, stored in the /var/db/ipf directory unless otherwise specified by the -d option. The state tables are locked at the beginning of this operation and unlocked once complete. FILES
/var/db/ipf/ipstate.ipf /var/db/ipf/ipnat.ipf /dev/ipl /dev/ipstate /dev/ipnat SEE ALSO
ipf(8), ipl(4), ipmon(8), ipnat(8) DIAGNOSTICS
Perhaps the -W and -R operations should set the locking but rather than undo it, restore it to what it was previously. Fragment table information is currently not saved. BUGS
If you find any, please send email to me at darrenr@pobox.com IPFS(8)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:36 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy