Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users VNC over SSH on a reversible tunnel Post 302591452 by chebarbudo on Thursday 19th of January 2012 01:35:29 PM
Old 01-19-2012
Hi Corona688,

And thanks so much for the idea. It sounds fantastic!
I'm now thinking of using this idea on a standard basis with all my clients.
I tried to get started with VPN in general.
And if I understand well, I can create sort of a global private network among all my customer's offices and mine. All controled by a VPN server that I'll choose to host public rather than behind my box.

Image

I got a few questions if you don't mind:

The public VPN server.
  • I will host it on a dedicated server at OVH.
  • It will have a public IP address (say 83.84.85.86).
  • Does it need to have a second NIC for the VPN address or is it just a setting in the service configuration.
  • Can I set it to route all traffic between my office and my customers and to route all traffic between my customers and me but not between my custmers?

All the network boxes.
  • If I understand well, there's nothing I need to configure given that the connection will be outgoing (from each network server to the VPN server). Is that correct?

All the network Debian servers.
  • I will install OpenVPN and set it to connect to the VPN server (83.84.85.86). That's it?
  • They usually just have one NIC. Do I just need to set them with a VPN compatible IP address?
  • At that point, will my Debian server be able to SSH connect to any client Debian server ?

All the network workstations.
  • I'd like to not set anything there. Just DHCP.
  • If I tell them the gateway is their local Debian server. And then if I tell the server to route requests through the VPN.
  • Will all the workstation look like they are in the same network?

This project seems very exciting!
I can't wait for another hint!
I know it's a lot of questions to ask so don't feel pressured and just answer whatever you have time for.

Thank you SOO much for your brilliant idea.

Santiago
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

vnc over an ssh tunnel Linux to Linux to Windows

I *think* what I want to do is not only possible but easy, but as a "dummy" :) I can't figure it out. Here's what I have: Linux (Ubuntu 10.04) laptop that is not in my house, but has an Internet connection. Linux (Ubuntu 9.04) computer in my house that has unfettered access to the... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: WesleyC
6 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

ssh decipher a tunnel

Two question here, but it's only one on the protocol point of view. If two persons use the same key to connect to a SSH server is there a risk they can decipher the other tunnel. In other terms is that less safe than if they have two separate keys. Same question if two persons use the same user... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: moi
2 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Stopping SSH tunnel

I have initiated a tunnel for vncserver. now i want to stop it. is there any way except sleep option? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: majid.merkava
2 Replies

4. Cybersecurity

RDP over SSH Tunnel

Hi all, I'm trying have an alternative way of connecting into a Corporate network. Mostly in case the VPN down as I cannot also change the security policy. I want to expose windows RDP over ssh tunnel. I have 3 hosts in my scenario 1- Host a : Windows 2k8 has no internet access just only an... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: h@foorsa.biz
3 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

SSH tunnel working for ssh but not for sshfs

I'm trying to setup a link between my home pc (work-machine) and a server at work (tar-machine) that is behind a gateway (hop-machine) and not directly accessible. my actions: work-machine$ ssh -L 1234:tar-machine:22 hop-machine work-machine$ ssh -p 1234 user@127.0.0.1 - shh access on... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Vathau
1 Replies

6. IP Networking

Help with SSH tunnel?

I have a Java web app on machine (X) that needs to talk to an LDAP server (Y) on :636, but the LDAP server is only accessible on a particular network. I can login to a machine (Z) on that network from X, and this machine can talk to the LDAP server on :636. How can I tunnel so that X can... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: spacegoose
2 Replies

7. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Ssh tunnel question

Hi all I have a suite of scripts that ssh to remote servers within a cluster and run some tests. This is done from a central server so that all of the test results can be captured in one location. Problem is I now have 509 tests and the number is growing. The scripts work by establishing a... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: steadyonabix
2 Replies

8. Proxy Server

WebSocket over SSH tunnel - is it possible?

Hello, I have a video streaming application that utilizes a WebSocket for the server <-> client communication. My goal is to make the video streaming service available over the internet in the cases where neither the server nor client have public IPs. One way to do this is over a VPN... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: Vladislav
8 Replies

9. Solaris

Tunnel X over ssh for 11.3

Hello Solaris experts: Trying to bring the 11.3 gdm screen over ssh to a Linux Box: I did the following: 1. made chanes to /etc/ssh/sshd_config & bounced ssh daemon: # X11 tunneling options X11Forwarding yes X11DisplayOffset 10 X11UseLocalhost yes 2. From the remote Linux box: ... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: delphys
6 Replies

10. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Tunnel using SSH

I am not clear with the part of concept of Tunneling using ssh. ssh -f -N -L 1029 192.168.1.47:25 james@192.168.1.47 I found out that above code works for me . but didn't quite well understood how ti works and need to ask you guys some questions. since we are using tunnel through ssh ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: lobsang
2 Replies
sshuttle(8)						      System Manager's Manual						       sshuttle(8)

NAME
sshuttle - a transparent proxy-based VPN using ssh SYNOPSIS
sshuttle [options...] [-r [username@]sshserver[:port]] <subnets...> DESCRIPTION
sshuttle allows you to create a VPN connection from your machine to any remote server that you can connect to via ssh, as long as that server has python 2.3 or higher. To work, you must have root access on the local machine, but you can have a normal account on the server. It's valid to run sshuttle more than once simultaneously on a single client machine, connecting to a different server every time, so you can be on more than one VPN at once. If run on a router, sshuttle can forward traffic for your entire subnet to the VPN. OPTIONS
<subnets...> a list of subnets to route over the VPN, in the form a.b.c.d[/width]. Valid examples are 1.2.3.4 (a single IP address), 1.2.3.4/32 (equivalent to 1.2.3.4), 1.2.3.0/24 (a 24-bit subnet, ie. with a 255.255.255.0 netmask), and 0/0 (`just route everything through the VPN'). -l, --listen=[ip:]port use this ip address and port number as the transparent proxy port. By default sshuttle finds an available port automatically and listens on IP 127.0.0.1 (localhost), so you don't need to override it, and connections are only proxied from the local machine, not from outside machines. If you want to accept connections from other machines on your network (ie. to run sshuttle on a router) try enabling IP Forwarding in your kernel, then using --listen 0.0.0.0:0. -H, --auto-hosts scan for remote hostnames and update the local /etc/hosts file with matching entries for as long as the VPN is open. This is nicer than changing your system's DNS (/etc/resolv.conf) settings, for several reasons. First, hostnames are added without domain names attached, so you can ssh thatserver without worrying if your local domain matches the remote one. Second, if you sshuttle into more than one VPN at a time, it's impossible to use more than one DNS server at once anyway, but sshuttle correctly merges /etc/hosts entries between all running copies. Third, if you're only routing a few subnets over the VPN, you probably would prefer to keep using your local DNS server for everything else. -N, --auto-nets in addition to the subnets provided on the command line, ask the server which subnets it thinks we should route, and route those automatically. The suggestions are taken automatically from the server's routing table. --dns capture local DNS requests and forward to the remote DNS server. --python specify the name/path of the remote python interpreter. The default is just python, which means to use the default python inter- preter on the remote system's PATH. -r, --remote=[username@]sshserver[:port] the remote hostname and optional username and ssh port number to use for connecting to the remote server. For example, example.com, testuser@example.com, testuser@example.com:2222, or example.com:2244. -x, --exclude=subnet explicitly exclude this subnet from forwarding. The format of this option is the same as the <subnets> option. To exclude more than one subnet, specify the -x option more than once. You can say something like 0/0 -x 1.2.3.0/24 to forward everything except the local subnet over the VPN, for example. -v, --verbose print more information about the session. This option can be used more than once for increased verbosity. By default, sshuttle prints only error messages. -e, --ssh-cmd the command to use to connect to the remote server. The default is just ssh. Use this if your ssh client is in a non-standard location or you want to provide extra options to the ssh command, for example, -e 'ssh -v'. --seed-hosts a comma-separated list of hostnames to use to initialize the --auto-hosts scan algorithm. --auto-hosts does things like poll local SMB servers for lists of local hostnames, but can speed things up if you use this option to give it a few names to start from. --no-latency-control sacrifice latency to improve bandwidth benchmarks. ssh uses really big socket buffers, which can overload the connection if you start doing large file transfers, thus making all your other sessions inside the same tunnel go slowly. Normally, sshuttle tries to avoid this problem using a "fullness check" that allows only a certain amount of outstanding data to be buffered at a time. But on high-bandwidth links, this can leave a lot of your bandwidth underutilized. It also makes sshuttle seem slow in bandwidth bench- marks (benchmarks rarely test ping latency, which is what sshuttle is trying to control). This option disables the latency control feature, maximizing bandwidth usage. Use at your own risk. -D, --daemon automatically fork into the background after connecting to the remote server. Implies --syslog. --syslog after connecting, send all log messages to the syslog(3) service instead of stderr. This is implicit if you use --daemon. --pidfile=pidfilename when using --daemon, save sshuttle's pid to pidfilename. The default is sshuttle.pid in the current directory. --server (internal use only) run the sshuttle server on stdin/stdout. This is what the client runs on the remote end. --firewall (internal use only) run the firewall manager. This is the only part of sshuttle that must run as root. If you start sshuttle as a non-root user, it will automatically run sudo or su to start the firewall manager, but the core of sshuttle still runs as a normal user. --hostwatch (internal use only) run the hostwatch daemon. This process runs on the server side and collects hostnames for the --auto-hosts option. Using this option by itself makes it a lot easier to debug and test the --auto-hosts feature. EXAMPLES
Test locally by proxying all local connections, without using ssh: $ sshuttle -v 0/0 Starting sshuttle proxy. Listening on ('0.0.0.0', 12300). [local sudo] Password: firewall manager ready. c : connecting to server... s: available routes: s: 192.168.42.0/24 c : connected. firewall manager: starting transproxy. c : Accept: 192.168.42.106:50035 -> 192.168.42.121:139. c : Accept: 192.168.42.121:47523 -> 77.141.99.22:443. ...etc... ^C firewall manager: undoing changes. KeyboardInterrupt c : Keyboard interrupt: exiting. c : SW#8:192.168.42.121:47523: deleting c : SW#6:192.168.42.106:50035: deleting Test connection to a remote server, with automatic hostname and subnet guessing: $ sshuttle -vNHr example.org Starting sshuttle proxy. Listening on ('0.0.0.0', 12300). firewall manager ready. c : connecting to server... s: available routes: s: 77.141.99.0/24 c : connected. c : seed_hosts: [] firewall manager: starting transproxy. hostwatch: Found: testbox1: 1.2.3.4 hostwatch: Found: mytest2: 5.6.7.8 hostwatch: Found: domaincontroller: 99.1.2.3 c : Accept: 192.168.42.121:60554 -> 77.141.99.22:22. ^C firewall manager: undoing changes. c : Keyboard interrupt: exiting. c : SW#6:192.168.42.121:60554: deleting DISCUSSION
When it starts, sshuttle creates an ssh session to the server specified by the -r option. If -r is omitted, it will start both its client and server locally, which is sometimes useful for testing. After connecting to the remote server, sshuttle uploads its (python) source code to the remote end and executes it there. Thus, you don't need to install sshuttle on the remote server, and there are never sshuttle version conflicts between client and server. Unlike most VPNs, sshuttle forwards sessions, not packets. That is, it uses kernel transparent proxying (iptables REDIRECT rules on Linux, or ipfw fwd rules on BSD) to capture outgoing TCP sessions, then creates entirely separate TCP sessions out to the original destination at the other end of the tunnel. Packet-level forwarding (eg. using the tun/tap devices on Linux) seems elegant at first, but it results in several problems, notably the `tcp over tcp' problem. The tcp protocol depends fundamentally on packets being dropped in order to implement its congestion control agorithm; if you pass tcp packets through a tcp-based tunnel (such as ssh), the inner tcp packets will never be dropped, and so the inner tcp stream's congestion control will be completely broken, and performance will be terrible. Thus, packet-based VPNs (such as IPsec and openvpn) cannot use tcp-based encrypted streams like ssh or ssl, and have to implement their own encryption from scratch, which is very complex and error prone. sshuttle's simplicity comes from the fact that it can safely use the existing ssh encrypted tunnel without incurring a performance penalty. It does this by letting the client-side kernel manage the incoming tcp stream, and the server-side kernel manage the outgoing tcp stream; there is no need for congestion control to be shared between the two separate streams, so a tcp-based tunnel is fine. BUGS
On MacOS 10.6 (at least up to 10.6.6), your network will stop responding about 10 minutes after the first time you start sshuttle, because of a MacOS kernel bug relating to arp and the net.inet.ip.scopedroute sysctl. To fix it, just switch your wireless off and on. Sshuttle makes the kernel setting it changes permanent, so this won't happen again, even after a reboot. SEE ALSO
ssh(1), python(1) AUTHORS
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>. Sshuttle 0.52 2011-04-04 sshuttle(8)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:05 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy