Sponsored Content
Operating Systems HP-UX Faster command for file copy than cp ? Post 302588089 by jim mcnamara on Friday 6th of January 2012 04:32:21 PM
Old 01-06-2012
Is there a valid reason why you cannot use 25 symbolic links instead of 25 copies of the same file? Think of the disk space you can save in a week.

Only reason I can think of not to us ln: if each file gets overwritten or edited by different users?

Otherwise you will have to create 25 processes to speed up copying. One for each destination. This is a LOT of possibly needless I/O.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

command faster in crontab..

Hi all you enlightened unix people, I've been trying to execute a perl script that contains the following line within backticks: `grep -f patternfile.txt otherfile.txt`;It takes normally 2 minutes to execute this command from the bash shell by hand. I noticed that when i run this command... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: silverlocket
2 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

How to make copy work faster

I am trying to copy a folder which contains a list of C executables. It takes 2 mins for completion,where as the entire script takes only 3 more minutes for other process. Is there a way to copy the folder faster so that the performance of the script will improve? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: prasperl
2 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Which command will be faster? y?

i)wc -c/etc/passwd|awk'{print $1}' ii)ls -al/etc/passwd|awk'{print $5}' (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: karthi_g
4 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

**HELP** need to split this line faster than cut-command

Hi, A datafile containing lines such as below needs to be split: 500000000000932491683600000000000000000000000000016800000GS0000000000932491683600*HOME I need to get the 2-5, 11-20, and 35-40 characters and I can do it via cut command. cut -c 2-5 file > temp1.txt cut -c 11-20 file >... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: daytripper1021
9 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

faster command than find for sorting?

I'm sorting files from a source directory by size into 4 categories then copying them into 4 corresponding folders, just wondering if there's a faster/better/more_elegant way to do this: find /home/user/sourcefiles -type f -size -400000k -exec /bin/cp -uv {} /home/user/medfiles/ \; find... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: unclecameron
0 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

Multi thread awk command for faster performance

Hi, I have a script below for extracting xml from a file. for i in *.txt do echo $i awk '/<.*/ , /.*<\/.*>/' "$i" | tr -d '\n' echo -ne '\n' done . I read about using multi threading to speed up the script. I do not know much about it but read it on this forum. Is it a... (21 Replies)
Discussion started by: chetan.c
21 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Faster way to use this awk command

awk "/May 23, 2012 /,0" /var/tmp/datafile the above command pulls out information in the datafile. the information it pulls is from the date specified to the end of the file. now, how can i make this faster if the datafile is huge? even if it wasn't huge, i feel there's a better/faster way to... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: SkySmart
8 Replies

8. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

A faster equivalent for this sed command

Hello guys, I'm cleaning out big XML files (we're talking about 1GB at least), most of them contain words written in a non-latin alphabet. The command I'm using is so slow it's not even funny: cat $1 | sed -e :a -e 's/&lt;*&gt;//g;/&lt;/N;//ba;s/</ /g;s/>/... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: bobylapointe
4 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

Making a faster alternative to a slow awk command

Hi, I have a large number of input files with two columns of numbers. For example: 83 1453 99 3255 99 8482 99 7372 83 175 I only wish to retain lines where the numbers fullfil two requirements. E.g: =83 1000<=<=2000 To do this I use the following... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: s052866
10 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

How to make awk command faster?

I have the below command which is referring a large file and it is taking 3 hours to run. Can something be done to make this command faster. awk -F ',' '{OFS=","}{ if ($13 == "9999") print $1,$2,$3,$4,$5,$6,$7,$8,$9,$10,$11,$12 }' ${NLAP_TEMP}/hist1.out|sort -T ${NLAP_TEMP} |uniq>... (13 Replies)
Discussion started by: Peu Mukherjee
13 Replies
GIT-SYMBOLIC-REF(1)						    Git Manual						       GIT-SYMBOLIC-REF(1)

NAME
git-symbolic-ref - Read, modify and delete symbolic refs SYNOPSIS
git symbolic-ref [-m <reason>] <name> <ref> git symbolic-ref [-q] [--short] <name> git symbolic-ref --delete [-q] <name> DESCRIPTION
Given one argument, reads which branch head the given symbolic ref refers to and outputs its path, relative to the .git/ directory. Typically you would give HEAD as the <name> argument to see which branch your working tree is on. Given two arguments, creates or updates a symbolic ref <name> to point at the given branch <ref>. Given --delete and an additional argument, deletes the given symbolic ref. A symbolic ref is a regular file that stores a string that begins with ref: refs/. For example, your .git/HEAD is a regular file whose contents is ref: refs/heads/master. OPTIONS
-d, --delete Delete the symbolic ref <name>. -q, --quiet Do not issue an error message if the <name> is not a symbolic ref but a detached HEAD; instead exit with non-zero status silently. --short When showing the value of <name> as a symbolic ref, try to shorten the value, e.g. from refs/heads/master to master. -m Update the reflog for <name> with <reason>. This is valid only when creating or updating a symbolic ref. NOTES
In the past, .git/HEAD was a symbolic link pointing at refs/heads/master. When we wanted to switch to another branch, we did ln -sf refs/heads/newbranch .git/HEAD, and when we wanted to find out which branch we are on, we did readlink .git/HEAD. But symbolic links are not entirely portable, so they are now deprecated and symbolic refs (as described above) are used by default. git symbolic-ref will exit with status 0 if the contents of the symbolic ref were printed correctly, with status 1 if the requested name is not a symbolic ref, or 128 if another error occurs. GIT
Part of the git(1) suite Git 1.8.5.3 01/14/2014 GIT-SYMBOLIC-REF(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:00 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy