Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers With Linux do Hardware Brands Matter? Post 302584309 by cjcox on Thursday 22nd of December 2011 06:23:38 PM
Old 12-22-2011
Hard question to answer. Yes... it is very true that most Windows Servers degrade performance wise over time even if not updated. For example, file system fragmentation.

Unix/Linux hosts will have much less fragmentation issues file system wise.

However, both Unix (AIX) and Linux can degrade as updates are made, especially if additional services are brought online, extra security is inserted or just growth of various programs. But in general, those items are not "big" killers of performance.

So... if vs. Windows, you can bet that the majority of it is OS related.

Linux is a good choice and much more affordable than commercial Unix (e.g. AIX) for learning some enterprise level software. Most of the major enterprise software manufacturers have excellent support Linux now.

With that said, not all hardware is created equal. "Cheap" consumer hardware is typically where the most problems are. You generally don't want bleeding edge because Linux might not support everything there. Usually big vendors have compatibility lists which will tell you whether or not Linux is supported on their servers (e.g. Dell, HP and IBM). Those same "big vendors" may also have consumer line hardware which is *not* ok for Linux... so do your research wisely.
 

8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Linux

What hardware will LINUX run on 386/486 ?

I'm really new to this and I want to learn UNIX/LINUX and saw the post about setting up a server to use everyday to practice. I have an old 386 PC and a 486 PC sitting around. Can they be reformatted and used to run UNIX/LINUX on as a network. (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Barkingmad
4 Replies

2. Hardware

Linux Hardware Compatibility Guide (2007 HOWTO)

Before posting questions about Linux hardware, it is a good idea to check the Linux Hardware HOWTO guide (Last Update: 2007-05-22) However, this HOWTO has not been maintained since 2007 and it out-of-date. (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
0 Replies

3. Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions

How To Check Hardware RAID On Windows and Linux

Hello, I have Win NT server running and I want to know how can I get Hardware RAID settings without rebooting the server? Thanks in advance. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: sureshcisco
2 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

What are the two ways the hardware clock can be configured under Linux?

What are the two ways the hardware clock can be configured under Linux? Thanks (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: lemon_06
3 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Linux on custom hardware

I would like to configure a bare minimum Linux with internet browser on a system with Flash & RAM (but no harddisk or any other nonvolatile storage). Please advise. (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: rherb
5 Replies

6. Hardware

Requirment are without password to get hardware info in the the linux using Qt?

Dear All, I have developed one application in the Qt Creator. I have one requirment for get hardward information in the Linux system, Then i try dmidecode using and run in Qt.It will occur error message for "dev/mem" permission denied". So i try to terminal to run sudo ./application. it will ask... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: JGops79
1 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Help with Linux hardware fault script in Perl

Hello, I am working on a Perl script to run from an AIX Nim server to extract hardware errors from our Linux server using various forms of grep statements - I have all my hosts in a text file and a command is run from the nim server to each host to pull out data from /var/log/messages and... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: neilh1704
5 Replies

8. Hardware

Does this hardware works with Linux

Hello folks, I pretend acquire this hardware: 1-Motherboard Asus Skt1151 - H110M-A/M.2 (https://www.asus.com/pt/Motherboards...cifications/); 2-Intel i5 6400 2.7Ghz QuadCore Skt1151; or 2-Intel i5 6500 3.2Ghz QuadCore Skt1151; 3-Dimm 8GB DDR4 Kingston CL15 2133Mhz; Obvious I pretend... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: enodev
1 Replies
LIBC(7) 						     Linux Programmer's Manual							   LIBC(7)

NAME
libc - overview of standard C libraries on Linux DESCRIPTION
The term "libc" is commonly used as a shorthand for the "standard C library", a library of standard functions that can be used by all C programs (and sometimes by programs in other languages). Because of some history (see below), use of the term "libc" to refer to the stan- dard C library is somewhat ambiguous on Linux. glibc By far the most widely used C library on Linux is the GNU C Library <http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/>, often referred to as glibc. This is the C library that is nowadays used in all major Linux distributions. It is also the C library whose details are documented in the rel- evant pages of the man-pages project (primarily in Section 3 of the manual). Documentation of glibc is also available in the glibc manual, available via the command info libc. Release 1.0 of glibc was made in September 1992. (There were earlier 0.x releases.) The next major release of glibc was 2.0, at the beginning of 1997. The pathname /lib/libc.so.6 (or something similar) is normally a symbolic link that points to the location of the glibc library, and exe- cuting this pathname will cause glibc to display various information about the version installed on your system. Linux libc In the early to mid 1990s, there was for a while Linux libc, a fork of glibc 1.x created by Linux developers who felt that glibc develop- ment at the time was not sufficing for the needs of Linux. Often, this library was referred to (ambiguously) as just "libc". Linux libc released major versions 2, 3, 4, and 5 (as well as many minor versions of those releases). For a while, Linux libc was the standard C library in many Linux distributions. However, notwithstanding the original motivations of the Linux libc effort, by the time glibc 2.0 was released, it was clearly superior to Linux libc, and all major Linux distributions that had been using Linux libc soon switched back to glibc. (Since this switch occurred over a decade ago, man-pages no longer takes care to document Linux libc details. Nevertheless, the history is visible in vestiges of information about Linux libc that remain in some manual pages, in particular, references to libc4 and libc5.) Other C libraries There are various other less widely used C libraries for Linux. These libraries are generally smaller than glibc, both in terms of fea- tures and memory footprint, and often intended for building small binaries, perhaps targeted at development for embedded Linux systems. Among such libraries are uClibc (http://www.uclibc.org/) and dietlibc (http://www.fefe.de/dietlibc/). Details of these libraries are gen- erally not covered by the man-pages project. SEE ALSO
syscalls(2), feature_test_macros(7), man-pages(7), standards(7) COLOPHON
This page is part of release 3.53 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, and information about reporting bugs, can be found at http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/. Linux 2012-08-05 LIBC(7)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:03 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy