Sponsored Content
Top Forums Programming sem_wait, sem_post confusion? Post 302582761 by gabam on Sunday 18th of December 2011 04:18:28 AM
Old 12-18-2011
sem_wait, sem_post confusion?

Hi friends,
I have written this small program using the concept of semaphores. I am a bit confused, hope u can help me with it.
The idea is that

1. Two threads are created
2. First will be displaying 0(zero) on the screen
3. Second will be displaing 1(one) on the screen
4. This process will go on upto three times for each thread, it would look like

Code:
 
0
 
1
 
0
 
1
 
0
 
1

But the program that i have written prints like this
0

0

0

1

1

1

I don't really know what I am missing here, could you pin point it to me, I think my concept of semaphores is corrct.
You can have a look at my code

Code:
 
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <sys/sem.h>
#include <semaphore.h>
sem_t mysem;
void *thread(void *);
int main()
{
        sem_init(&mysem,0,1);
        pthread_t tid[2];
 
        pthread_attr_t attr[2];
        pthread_attr_init(&attr[0]);
        pthread_attr_init(&attr[1]);
        {
        pthread_create(&tid[0],&attr[0],thread,(void *)0);
        pthread_create(&tid[1],&attr[1],thread,(void *)1);
        }
        {
        pthread_join(tid[0],NULL);
        pthread_join(tid[1],NULL);
        }
        printf("\nThreads finished!\n");
        return 0;
}
void *thread(void *n)
{
        int i;
        i = (int)n;
        int x = 0;
        while(x < 3)
        {
        sem_wait(&mysem);
        printf("%d\n\n",i);
        sem_post(&mysem);
        x++;
        }
        pthread_exit(0);
}

But the same program works when I put a sleep(1) in the middle like this

Code:
void *thread(void *n)
{
        int i;
        i = (int)n;
        int x = 0;
        while(x < 3)
        {
        sem_wait(&mysem);
        printf("%d\n\n",i);
        sem_post(&mysem);
        x++;
        sleep(1);
        }
        pthread_exit(0);
}

But I want to achieve what I want to achieve by using only semaphores, no sleep function,

Thanks
Looking forward to your lovely replies.
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

'tr' confusion

Good day, everyone! Could anybody explain me the following situation. If I'm running similar script: Var="anna.kurnikova" Var2="Anna Kurn" echo $Var | tr -t "$Var" "$Var2" Why the output is : anna KurniKova instead of Anna Kurnikova? :confused: Thank you in advance for any... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Nafanja
2 Replies

2. Programming

C fork Confusion :-?

Hi, I was trying to learn forking in C in UNIX. Somehow i still haven't been able to get the concept well. I mean, i do understand that fork creates an exact replica of the parent (other than the fact that parent gets the process id of the child and child gets 0 when fork is called). This is the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: ralpheno
2 Replies

3. Solaris

Printer confusion

I have printer old about 5 year , but I can not determine which driver to use output of ls -al /usr/share/lib/terminfo/h -rw-r--r-- 1 root bin 961 Jan 22 2005 h1000 -rw-r--r-- 1 root bin 1002 Jan 22 2005 h1420 -rw-r--r-- 1 root bin 1009... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: solaris_user
2 Replies

4. Cybersecurity

LDAP; confusion

Hello, I hope all is well. Two issues that I am grappling with. One: Is this a true statement: (AIX, LDAP configured), even if authentication is configured with LDAP, the system would still need to be authenticated against local (/etc/passwd); incase of network failure? Two: I can log... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: rsheikh
0 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

conditional confusion

Hell Unix.com Community: I am working on a personal project using yad v0.12.4 (zenity fork) and have hit a wall on how to show a progress bar while my function is processing. I have been all over the ABS Guide, googled 21 Linux-specific sites that I revere. I even asked on the yad-common... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Habitual
4 Replies

6. Programming

Undefined: sem_init, sem_post, sem_wait

Hi friends, I am using semaphores in my program, but when I compile the program, it gives the following error $ gcc sem.c -o sem -lpthread Undefined first referenced symbol in file sem_init ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: gabam
1 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Confusion with PS

Hello All, I have a problem in counting number of process getting run with my current script name.. Here it is ps -ef | grep $0 | grep -v grep This display just one line with the PID, PPID and other details when i print it in the script. But when I want to count the numbers in my... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: sathyaonnuix
11 Replies

8. Homework & Coursework Questions

Semaphores sem_wait sem_post problem

hallo! if there are many processes running and I initialize the semaphore like this: my_sem = sem_open(SEM_NAME, O_CREAT | O_RDWR, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, 10); (the last argument is 10) and then i use sem_wait(my_sem); sleep(5); sem_post; Will 10 processes be able to access the... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: whatevernever
1 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Confusion with the concept of wc -c and wc -m

Is wc -c and wc -m same ? Shellscript::cat file1 hello Shellscript::cat file1 | wc -c 6 Shellscript::cat file1 | wc -m 6 Shellscript::file file1 file1: ASCII text Shellscript::uname -a Linux was85host 2.6.27.45-0.1-vmi #1 SMP 2010-02-22 16:49:47 +0100 i686 i686 i386 GNU/LinuxAtleast... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: shellscripting
5 Replies
SEM_OVERVIEW(7) 					     Linux Programmer's Manual						   SEM_OVERVIEW(7)

NAME
sem_overview - overview of POSIX semaphores DESCRIPTION
POSIX semaphores allow processes and threads to synchronize their actions. A semaphore is an integer whose value is never allowed to fall below zero. Two operations can be performed on semaphores: increment the semaphore value by one (sem_post(3)); and decrement the semaphore value by one (sem_wait(3)). If the value of a semaphore is currently zero, then a sem_wait(3) operation will block until the value becomes greater than zero. POSIX semaphores come in two forms: named semaphores and unnamed semaphores. Named semaphores A named semaphore is identified by a name of the form /somename; that is, a null-terminated string of up to NAME_MAX-4 (i.e., 251) characters consisting of an initial slash, followed by one or more characters, none of which are slashes. Two processes can operate on the same named semaphore by passing the same name to sem_open(3). The sem_open(3) function creates a new named semaphore or opens an existing named semaphore. After the semaphore has been opened, it can be operated on using sem_post(3) and sem_wait(3). When a process has finished using the semaphore, it can use sem_close(3) to close the semaphore. When all processes have finished using the semaphore, it can be removed from the system using sem_unlink(3). Unnamed semaphores (memory-based semaphores) An unnamed semaphore does not have a name. Instead the semaphore is placed in a region of memory that is shared between multiple threads (a thread-shared semaphore) or processes (a process-shared semaphore). A thread-shared semaphore is placed in an area of memory shared between the threads of a process, for example, a global variable. A process-shared semaphore must be placed in a shared memory region (e.g., a System V shared memory segment created using shmget(2), or a POSIX shared memory object built created using shm_open(3)). Before being used, an unnamed semaphore must be initialized using sem_init(3). It can then be operated on using sem_post(3) and sem_wait(3). When the semaphore is no longer required, and before the memory in which it is located is deallocated, the semaphore should be destroyed using sem_destroy(3). The remainder of this section describes some specific details of the Linux implementation of POSIX semaphores. Versions Prior to kernel 2.6, Linux supported only unnamed, thread-shared semaphores. On a system with Linux 2.6 and a glibc that provides the NPTL threading implementation, a complete implementation of POSIX semaphores is provided. Persistence POSIX named semaphores have kernel persistence: if not removed by sem_unlink(3), a semaphore will exist until the system is shut down. Linking Programs using the POSIX semaphores API must be compiled with cc -pthread to link against the real-time library, librt. Accessing named semaphores via the filesystem On Linux, named semaphores are created in a virtual filesystem, normally mounted under /dev/shm, with names of the form sem.somename. (This is the reason that semaphore names are limited to NAME_MAX-4 rather than NAME_MAX characters.) Since Linux 2.6.19, ACLs can be placed on files under this directory, to control object permissions on a per-user and per-group basis. NOTES
System V semaphores (semget(2), semop(2), etc.) are an older semaphore API. POSIX semaphores provide a simpler, and better designed inter- face than System V semaphores; on the other hand POSIX semaphores are less widely available (especially on older systems) than System V semaphores. EXAMPLE
An example of the use of various POSIX semaphore functions is shown in sem_wait(3). SEE ALSO
sem_close(3), sem_destroy(3), sem_getvalue(3), sem_init(3), sem_open(3), sem_post(3), sem_unlink(3), sem_wait(3), pthreads(7), shm_over- view(7) COLOPHON
This page is part of release 4.15 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, information about reporting bugs, and the latest version of this page, can be found at https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/. Linux 2017-05-03 SEM_OVERVIEW(7)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:29 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy