Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Physical Memory expansion
Operating Systems AIX Physical Memory expansion Post 302582624 by 1computerman on Friday 16th of December 2011 02:49:00 PM
Old 12-16-2011
Question Physical Memory expansion

IBM says we cannot expand our physical memory on our 570's without upgrading all the existing DIMMS since all slots are currently full. Is it really so difficult for IBM to build servers that leave a couple vacant slots for future expansion? A technical explanation would be greatly appreciated. Thanks All.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

Physical Memory

Hi, My problem is next.... How can I work with physical memory in the Unix FreeBSD 2.2 or hight? What is the "mem" & "kmem" drivers? P.S./ writing device driver for UNIX FreeBSD 2.2 :D (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Alex_T
2 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

physical memory

It is just a general question....is there a limit on the memory? I am looking into a process to store image files on the unix server which will be accessed by the application, and I just wonder if there is any limit regarding the physical or virtual memory. I am very new to unix, so thanks for... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: cchien
1 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

get physical and virtual memory

What command can i use to get the physical and virtual memory of a database? (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: tads98
7 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

vmstat -P (physical memory)

vmstat -P commands gives me an output as shown at the end of this message. my first question is about the difference between "total physical memory" and "total physical memory use" "Total Physical Memory" -"Total Physical Memory Use" 524288 pages-524026 pages= 262 pages does it mean... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: gfhgfnhhn
0 Replies

5. Solaris

How to check physical memory

HI Please help me how to check the physical memory, model name and hardisk information. (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: jeelans
5 Replies

6. Solaris

physical memory

what is the command to find the physical memory in soalris OS and how to find whether paging is happening or not ? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: jayaramanit
2 Replies

7. Solaris

How to find Total and Free Physical Memory and Logical Memory in SOLARIS 9

Hi, Im working on Solaris 9 on SPARC-32 bit running on an Ultra-80, and I have to find out the following:- 1. Total Physical Memory in the system(total RAM). 2. Available Physical Memory(i.e. RAM Usage) 3. Total (Logical) Memory in the system 4. Available (Logical) Memory. I know... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: 0ktalmagik
4 Replies

8. Solaris

restrcit physical memory with zone.max-locked-memory

Is it possible to restrict physical memory in solaris zone with zone.max-locked-memory just like we can do with rcapd ? I do not want to used rcapd (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: fugitive
1 Replies

9. AIX

AIX 5.3 Physical Memory usage

Hi, I have AIX 5.3TL8 two node cluster using HACMP and have 10g database using RAW devices. I am seeing gradual increase in comp% memory everyday and it reaches 100% and evicts the node, we had 4 evictions in 40days. I am pasting vmstat and vmo output, anyone seen this issue? ... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: navin7386
5 Replies

10. Solaris

Physical memory calculation

Below is Physical Memory result : -bash-3.00$ prtconf | grep "Memory size" Memory size: 36854 Megabytes -bash-3.00$ vmstat 1 2 | tail -1 0 0 0 28220616 1318888 15 143 0 0 0 0 0 253 2 15 0 5215 14989 5917 7 0 93 and the script i have to calculate this in Percentage is : #!/bin/sh... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: mjoshi010207
3 Replies
moc(1)							      General Commands Manual							    moc(1)

NAME
moc - generate Qt meta object support code SYNOPSIS
moc [-o file] [-i] [-f] [-k] [-ldbg] [-nw] [-p path] [-q path] [-v] file DESCRIPTION
This page documents the Meta Object Compiler for the Qt GUI application framework. The moc reads one or more C++ class declarations from a C++ header or source file and generates one C++ source file containing meta object information for the classes. The C++ source file generated by the moc must be compiled and linked with the implementation of the class (or it can be #included into the class's source file). If you use qmake to create your Makefiles, build rules will be included that call the moc when required, so you will not need to use the moc directly. In brief, the meta object system is a structure used by Qt (see http://doc.trolltech.com) for component programming and run time type information. It adds properties and inheritance information to (some) classes and provides a new type of communication between those instances of those classes, signal-slot connections. OPTIONS
-o file Write output to file rather than to stdout. -f Force the generation of an #include statement in the output. This is the default for files whose name matches the regular expression .[hH][^.]* (i.e. the extension starts with H or h ). This option is only useful if you have header files that do not follow the standard naming conventions. -i Do not generate an #include statement in the output. This may be used to run moc on a C++ file containing one or more class declarations. You should then #include the meta object code in the .cpp file (see USAGE below). If both -f and -i are present, the last one wins. -nw Do not generate any warnings. Not recommended. -ldbg Write a flood of lex debug information to stdout. -p path Makes moc prepend path/ to the file name in the generated #include statement (if one is generated). -q path Makes moc prepend path/ to the file name of qt #include files in the generated code. -v Displays the version of moc and Qt. You can explicitly tell the moc not to parse parts of a header file. It recognizes any C++ comment (//) that contains the substrings MOC_SKIP_BEGIN or MOC_SKIP_END. They work as you would expect and you can have several levels of them. The net result as seen by the moc is as if you had removed all lines between a MOC_SKIP_BEGIN and a MOC_SKIP_END USAGE
moc is almost always invoked by make(1), not by hand. moc is typically used with an input file containing class declarations like this: class YourClass : public QObject { Q_OBJECT Q_PROPERTY( ... ) Q_CLASSINFO( ... ) public: YourClass( QObject * parent=0, const char * name=0 ); ~YourClass(); signals: public slots: }; Here is a useful makefile rule if you only use GNU make: m%.cpp: %.h moc $< -o $@ If you want to write portably, you can use individual rules of the following form: mNAME.cpp: NAME.h moc $< -o $@ You must also remember to add mNAME.cpp to your SOURCES (substitute your favorite name) variable and mNAME.o to your OBJECTS variable. (While we prefer to name our C++ source files .cpp, the moc doesn't know that, so you can use .C, .cc, .CC, .cxx or even .c++ if you prefer.) If you have class declarations in C++ files, we recommend that you use a makefile rule like this: NAME.o: mNAME.cpp mNAME.cpp: NAME.cpp moc -i $< -o $@ This guarantees that make(1) will run the moc before it compiles NAME.cpp. You can then put #include "nNAME.cpp" at the end of NAME.cpp, where all the classes declared in that file are fully known. DIAGNOSTICS
Sometimes you may get linkage errors, saying that YourClass::className() is undefined or that YourClass lacks a vtbl. Those errors happen most often when you forget to compile the moc-generated C++ code or include that object file in the link command. The moc will warn you about a number of dangerous or illegal constructs. BUGS
The moc does not expand #include or #define, it simply skips any preprocessor directives it encounters. This is regrettable, but is normally not a problem in practice. The moc does not handle all of C++. The main problem is that class templates cannot have signals or slots. This is an important bug. Here is an example: class SomeTemplate<int> : public QFrame { Q_OBJECT .... signals: void bugInMocDetected( int ); }; Less importantly, the following constructs are illegal. All of them have have alternatives which we think are usually better, so removing these limitations is not a high priority for us. Multiple inheritance requires QObject to be first. If you are using multiple inheritance, moc assumes that the first inherited class is a subclass of QObject. Also, be sure that only the first inherited class is a QObject. class SomeClass : public QObject, public OtherClass { ... }; This bug is almost impossible to fix; since the moc does not expand #include or #define, it cannot find out which one of the base classes is a QObject. Function pointers cannot be arguments to signals or slots. In most cases where you would consider that, we think inheritance is a better alternative. Here is an example of illegal syntax: class SomeClass : public QObject { Q_OBJECT ... public slots: // illegal void apply( void (*apply)(List *, void *), void * ); }; You can work around this restriction like this: typedef void (*ApplyFunctionType)( List *, void * ); class SomeClass : public QObject { Q_OBJECT ... public slots: void apply( ApplyFunctionType, char * ); }; It may sometimes be even better to replace the function pointer with inheritance and virtual functions, signals or slots. Friend declarations cannot be placed in signals or slots sections Sometimes it will work, but in general, friend declarations cannot be placed in signals or slots sections. Put them in the good old private, protected or public sections instead. Here is an example of the illegal syntax: class SomeClass : public QObject { Q_OBJECT ... signals: friend class ClassTemplate<char>; // illegal }; Signals and slots cannot be upgraded The C++ feature of upgrading an inherited member function to public status is not extended to cover signals and slots. Here is an illegal example: class Whatever : public QButtonGroup { ... public slots: QButtonGroup::buttonPressed; // illegal ... }; The QButtonGroup::buttonPressed() slot is protected. C++ quiz: What happens if you try to upgrade a protected member function which is overloaded? - All the functions are upgraded. - That is not legal C++. Type macros cannot be used for signal and slot arguments Since the moc does not expand #define, type macros that take an argument will not work in signals and slots. Here is an illegal example: #ifdef ultrix #define SIGNEDNESS(a) unsigned a #else #define SIGNEDNESS(a) a #endif class Whatever : public QObject { ... signals: void someSignal( SIGNEDNESS(int) ); // illegal }; A #define without arguments works. Nested classes cannot be in the signals or slots sections nor have signals or slots Here's an example: class A { Q_OBJECT public: class B { public slots: // illegal void b(); ... }; signals: class B { // illegal void b(); ... }: }; Constructors cannot be used in signals or slots sections It is a mystery to us why anyone would put a constructor on either the signals or slots sections. You can't, anyway (except that it happens to work in some cases). Put them in private, protected or public sections, where they belong. Here is an example of the illegal syntax: class SomeClass : public QObject { Q_OBJECT public slots: SomeClass( QObject *parent, const char *name ) : QObject( parent, name ) {} // illegal ... }; Properties need to be declared before the public section that contains the respective get and set functions Declaring the first property within or after the public section that contains the type definition and the respective get and set functions does not work as expected. The moc will complain that it can neither find the functions nor resolve the type. Here is an example of the illegal syntax: class SomeClass : public QObject { Q_OBJECT public: ... // illegal Q_PROPERTY( Priority priority READ priority WRITE setPriority ) Q_ENUMS( Priority ) enum Priority { High, Low, VeryHigh, VeryLow }; void setPriority( Priority ); Priority priority() const; ... }; Work around this limitation by declaring all properties at the beginning of the class declaration, right after Q_OBJECT: class SomeClass : public QObject { Q_OBJECT Q_PROPERTY( Priority priority READ priority WRITE setPriority ) Q_ENUMS( Priority ) public: ... enum Priority { High, Low, VeryHigh, VeryLow }; void setPriority( Priority ); Priority priority() const; ... }; SEE ALSO
http://www.trolltech.com, C++ ARM, section r.11.3 (for the answer to the quiz), and http://doc.trolltech.com (for complete Qt documentation). Trolltech AS 24 June 2001 moc(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:42 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy