Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Pointer to pointers
Top Forums Programming Pointer to pointers Post 302572381 by pharaoh on Wednesday 9th of November 2011 09:26:57 PM
Old 11-09-2011
Thank you @agama! You helped a lot and I learned something.
Thank you @agama!
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

Regarding Function and Pointers.

HI, Here is some thing that is puzzling me from a long time. Can some body explain me this with example. The question is :- What is the difference between function pointer and pointer to a function. Where do we actually use the function pointers and pointer to functions. Thanks in... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: S.Vishwanath
0 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

functiom pointers

Hi all i wonder about function pointers as i never used them in my C code . could any tell me why and where exactly function pointers come into picture . thanq (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Raom
1 Replies

3. Programming

pointers

is this a valid c declaration int (*ptr(int *b)); plz explain... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: areef4u
4 Replies

4. Programming

pointers

Hi I mash with pointers in C. I solve this problem about 5 hours and I don't know how I should continue. void InsertFirst (tList *L, int val) { tElemPtr new; if((new = malloc(sizeof(tElemPtr))) == NULL) Error(); new->data = val; new->ptr = L->frst; L->frst = new;... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Milla
2 Replies

5. Programming

Pointer to a struct (with pointers) *** glibc detected *** double free

I am using a structure defined as follows struct gene_square { double *x; double *y; };I have class, with a member function which is a pointer of this type: gene_square* m_Genes;I am allocating memory in the constructors like this: m_Genes = new gene_square; for (ii=0;... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jatoo
1 Replies

6. Programming

pass a pointer-to-pointer, or return a pointer?

If one wants to get a start address of a array or a string or a block of memory via a function, there are at least two methods to achieve it: (1) one is to pass a pointer-to-pointer parameter, like: int my_malloc(int size, char **pmem) { *pmem=(char *)malloc(size); if(*pmem==NULL)... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: aaronwong
11 Replies

7. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

shared pointers

I am new to shared pointer conceot in C++ and hence require some clarification: For example: class A { public: virtual ~A() { } int x; }; typedef boost::shared_ptr<A>... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: uunniixx
1 Replies

8. Programming

Need help with the Pointers in C

I have a special character called ô. When it is declared as a character variable its showing it can be printed. But when it is declared as a character pointer variable its showing it cannot be printed. I am just wondering why its happening like this.. c1 = '@'; c2 = 'ô'; char *fp; fp="XXô"; if... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sivakumar.rj
1 Replies

9. Programming

Problem With Pointers

Hi guys. What is the difference between these: 1. int *a; 2. int (*a); (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: majid.merkava
2 Replies

10. Programming

Pointers and array

Hello, I read from a book exercise for a challenge. How to print out each letter of char array a by two different pointers pa and ppa in the example? I have tried my code for letter "r" by testing without full understanding as only the first one worked. #include<stdio.h> int main() { char... (17 Replies)
Discussion started by: yifangt
17 Replies
AnyEvent::Impl::IOAsync(3pm)				User Contributed Perl Documentation			      AnyEvent::Impl::IOAsync(3pm)

NAME
AnyEvent::Impl::IOAsync - AnyEvent adaptor for IO::Async SYNOPSIS
use AnyEvent; use IO::Async::Loop; # optionally set another event loop use AnyEvent::Impl::IOAsync; my $loop = new IO::Async::Loop; AnyEvent::Impl::IOAsync::set_loop $loop; DESCRIPTION
This module provides support for IO::Async as AnyEvent backend. It supports I/O, timers, signals and child process watchers. Idle watchers are emulated. I/O watchers need to dup their fh because IO::Async only supports IO handles, not plain file descriptors. PROBLEMS WITH IO
::Async This section had a long list of problems and shortcomings that made it almost impossible to support IO::Async. With version 0.33 of IO::Async, however, most of these have been fixed, so IO::Async can now be used as easily as many other loops. There are a few remaining problems that require emulation or workarounds: No support for multiple watchers per event In most (all? documentation?) cases you cannot have multiple watchers for the same event (what's the point of having all these fancy notifier classes when you cannot have multiple notifiers for the same event? That's like only allowing one timer per second or so...). For I/O watchers, AnyEvent has to dup() every file handle, as IO::Async fails to support the same or different file handles pointing to the same fd (the good thing is that it is documented, but why not fix it instead?). Apart from these fatal flaws, there are a number of unpleasent properties that just need some mentioning: Confusing and misleading names Another rather negative point about this module family is its name, which is deeply confusing: Despite the "async" in the name, IO::Async only does synchronous I/O, there is nothing "asynchronous" about it whatsoever (when I first heard about it, I thought, "wow, a second async I/O module, what does it do compared to IO::AIO", and was somehow set back when I learned that the only "async" aspect of it is the name). Inconsistent, incomplete and convoluted API Implementing AnyEvent's rather simple timers on top of IO::Async's timers was a nightmare (try implementing a timer with configurable interval and delay value...). The method naming is chaotic: "watch_child" creates a child watcher, but "watch_io" is an internal method; "detach_signal" removes a signal watcher, but "detach_child" forks a subprocess and so on). Unpleasant surprises on GNU/Linux When you develop your program on FreeBSD and run it on GNU/Linux, you might have unpleasant surprises, as IO::Async::Loop will by default use IO::Async::Loop::Epoll, which is incompatible with "fork", so your network server will run into spurious and very hard to debug problems under heavy load, as IO::Async forks a lot of processes, e.g. for DNS resolution. It would be better if IO::Async would only load "safe" backends by default (or fix the epoll backend to work in the presence of fork, which admittedly is hard - EV does it for you, and also does not use unsafe backends by default). On the positive side, performance with IO::Async is quite good even in my very demanding eyes. SEE ALSO
AnyEvent, IO::Async. AUTHOR
Marc Lehmann <schmorp@schmorp.de> http://anyevent.schmorp.de Paul Evans <leonerd@leonerd.org.uk> Rewrote the backend for IO::Async version 0.33. perl v5.14.2 2012-04-08 AnyEvent::Impl::IOAsync(3pm)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:37 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy