Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Problem with AWK and OFS
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers Problem with AWK and OFS Post 302566567 by Xterra on Thursday 20th of October 2011 03:38:58 PM
Old 10-20-2011
bartus

As usual you are right on the money! For my education, why "END"?

vgersh99,

I am not getting the expected output with your code
Quote:
"Contig 1" (1,314)
Contig Length: 314 bases
Average Length/Sequence: 257 bases
Total Sequence Length: 515 bases
Top Strand: 1 sequences
Bottom Strand: 1 sequences
Total: 2 sequences
FEATURES Location/Qualifiers
coverage_once 1..56
/Note="Only_once"
coverage_below 57..257
/Note="Below threshold"
coverage_once 258..314
/Note="Only_once"
>Prueba.seq
TTTGGATATGATGATGAACTGGTCACCTACAACGGCCCTGGTGGTATCGCAGTTACTCCGGATCCCACAAGCTGTCGTGGATATGGTGGCGGGGGCCC
How can I modify it to get the sequence only?
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

OFS in awk

Hi, I have these out put field seperator changed to "|" in my awk command, but it didn't give me the result. Can someone help me find out why? ======================================= /bin/awk 'BEGIN { OFS="|" } { print $0 }' list.tmp.$$ > listtmp.$$ =======================================... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: whatsfordinner
1 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

OFS in awk.

OFS is inbuild command in awk. I have a file file.txt abc : def : ghi jkl : mno: pqr stu : vwx :yzz code i used: awk -F ":" 'BEGIN {OFS="|"} {print $1,$2}' file.txt output: abc def jkl mno stu vwx but as i have used OFS="|" and i am expecting output as: abc | def jkl... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: salil2012
4 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

AWK - OFS

Hi All, I have a comma seperated delimited file with 10 columns. I need to convert it into TAB seperated delimited file. awk -F"," '{print $1"\t"$2"\t"$3"\t"$4"\t"$5"\t"$6"\t"$7"\t"$8"\t"$9"\t"$10}' a.txt >> b.txt how to use OFS to get the same output. I have tried by googling, but it... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: Amit.Sagpariya
5 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

Parsing XML in awk : OFS does not work as expected

Hi, I am trying to parse regular XML file where I have to reduce number of decimal points in some xml elements. I am using following AWK command to achive that : #!/bin/ksh EDITCMD='BEGIN { FS = ""; OFS=FS } { if ( $3 ~ "*\\.*" && length(substr($3,1+index($3,"."))) == 15 ) {... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: martin.franek
4 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

Awk OFS issues

Hi Im trying to tidy up the output of a who command when it writes to a log, everything I've tried doesnt seem to work though, any help would be massively appreciated. Im using the awk command to set the OFS as tab. #!/bin/bash who >> /export/home/tjmoore/logusers awk -F 'BEGIN... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: 02JayJay02
3 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

Awk OFS issues

Hi, Could anyone tell me what Im doing wrong here any help will be much appreciated #!/bin/bash ls -ltr /export/home/tjmoore > /export/home/tjmoore/log100 awk -F " " /export/home/tjmoore/log100 'BEGIN {OFS="\t";} {print $1,$2,$3,$4,$5, $6,$7,$8,$9;}' > /export/home/tjmoore/log1001 I... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: 02JayJay02
9 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

OFS in awk

Hello, I have an issue with adding commas as delimiters in this scenario: cat xtr3.rpl|head -5|awk 'BEGIN {OFS=","} {print $1,$2,$3,$4}' Produces this output: 00530083,0000000471,000000000000.00,000000000000.00 00530085,0000000471,000000000000.00,000000000000.00... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: MIA651
10 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

OFS print awk

file: sasa|asasa|asasa|asas erer|Erer|rere|ererer Output needed : sasa:asasa:asasa:asas erer:Erer:rere:ererer Im getting output, when i use the $1,$2. awk -F'|' 'BEGIN{OFS=":";} {print $1,$2; }' file Output : sasa:asasa erer:Erer But when i need the whole column, i... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: Ramesh M
5 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

OFS does not apply to few records in awk

Hi , I am having a problem with my awk oneliner , which for some reason leaves the first two records Input File $ cat file1 A1:B1:C1:NoLimit M1:M2:M3:Limit A2:B2:C2,C3,C4,C5 A3:B3:C3,C4,C5,C6,C7Desired output A1,B1,C1,NoLimit M1,M2,M3,Limit A2,B2,C2 ,,,C3 ,,,C4 ,,,C5 A3,B3,C3... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: chidori
5 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

awk - OFS printing duplicate. Why?

Why the following code printing duplicate records? bash-4.1$ cat rm1 c1 c2 c3 l1 2 3 4 l2 2 3 2 bash-4.1$ awk '{print $0} OFS = "\n"' rm1 c1 c2 c3 c1 c2 c3 l1 2 3 4 l1 2 3... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: quincyjones
4 Replies
GIT-MERGE-BASE(1)						    Git Manual							 GIT-MERGE-BASE(1)

NAME
git-merge-base - Find as good common ancestors as possible for a merge SYNOPSIS
git merge-base [-a|--all] <commit> <commit>... git merge-base [-a|--all] --octopus <commit>... git merge-base --independent <commit>... DESCRIPTION
git merge-base finds best common ancestor(s) between two commits to use in a three-way merge. One common ancestor is better than another common ancestor if the latter is an ancestor of the former. A common ancestor that does not have any better common ancestor is a best common ancestor, i.e. a merge base. Note that there can be more than one merge base for a pair of commits. OPERATION MODE
As the most common special case, specifying only two commits on the command line means computing the merge base between the given two commits. More generally, among the two commits to compute the merge base from, one is specified by the first commit argument on the command line; the other commit is a (possibly hypothetical) commit that is a merge across all the remaining commits on the command line. As a consequence, the merge base is not necessarily contained in each of the commit arguments if more than two commits are specified. This is different from git-show-branch(1) when used with the --merge-base option. --octopus Compute the best common ancestors of all supplied commits, in preparation for an n-way merge. This mimics the behavior of git show-branch --merge-base. --independent Instead of printing merge bases, print a minimal subset of the supplied commits with the same ancestors. In other words, among the commits given, list those which cannot be reached from any other. This mimics the behavior of git show-branch --independent. OPTIONS
-a, --all Output all merge bases for the commits, instead of just one. DISCUSSION
Given two commits A and B, git merge-base A B will output a commit which is reachable from both A and B through the parent relationship. For example, with this topology: o---o---o---B / ---o---1---o---o---o---A the merge base between A and B is 1. Given three commits A, B and C, git merge-base A B C will compute the merge base between A and a hypothetical commit M, which is a merge between B and C. For example, with this topology: o---o---o---o---C / / o---o---o---B / / ---2---1---o---o---o---A the result of git merge-base A B C is 1. This is because the equivalent topology with a merge commit M between B and C is: o---o---o---o---o / / o---o---o---o---M / / ---2---1---o---o---o---A and the result of git merge-base A M is 1. Commit 2 is also a common ancestor between A and M, but 1 is a better common ancestor, because 2 is an ancestor of 1. Hence, 2 is not a merge base. The result of git merge-base --octopus A B C is 2, because 2 is the best common ancestor of all commits. When the history involves criss-cross merges, there can be more than one best common ancestor for two commits. For example, with this topology: ---1---o---A / X / ---2---o---o---B both 1 and 2 are merge-bases of A and B. Neither one is better than the other (both are best merge bases). When the --all option is not given, it is unspecified which best one is output. SEE ALSO
git-rev-list(1), git-show-branch(1), git-merge(1) GIT
Part of the git(1) suite Git 1.7.10.4 11/24/2012 GIT-MERGE-BASE(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:58 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy