ext4 uses generic_file_llseek for lseek, and I find this implementation for that in fs/read_write.c:
So really, nothing to it, and the only thing that could be blocking is that mutex...
I think you've saturated the kernel with so many simultaneous system calls to the same inode that they're competing for i_mutex.
I don't think this'd happen if you hadn't opened it with O_DIRECT. Caching is your friend...
Last edited by Corona688; 09-13-2011 at 11:05 AM..
Hi,
I am accepting a string from user. compare this output with the awk output as below...
echo "\n\n\tDay : \c"
read day
awk '{ if($day == $2) { if ($mon == $1) { print "Yes" }}}' syslog.txt
I am getting the follwoing error
awk: Field $() is not correct.
The input line... (5 Replies)
recently my project needs me to lseek a position over 4G size....
i found in linux or unix the parameters are all ulong 32 bits...the limit dooms the movement of a position over 4G
I was told that i should lseek64 to meet my need... but i have no idea where i can get the function neither by "man... (8 Replies)
Hey Guys
I am trying to implement the malloc function for my OS class and I am having a little trouble with it. I would be really grateful if I could get some hints on this problem.
So I am using a doubly-linked list as my data structure and I have to allocate memory for it (duh...). The... (1 Reply)
Hey Guys
Some of my friends have got together and we are trying to write a basic kernel similar to Linux. I am trying to implement the malloc function in C and I am using a doubly linked list as the primary data structure. I need to allocate memory for this link list (duh...) and I don't feel... (2 Replies)
I know there is lseek() function that will allow to write or read from certain position in the file. Is there similar function that will let do same but for array rather then file? (9 Replies)
I tried to use lseek system call to determine the number of bytes in a file. To do so, I used open system call with O_APPEND flag to open a file. As lseek returns the current offset so I called lseek for opened file with offset as zero and whence as SEEK_CUR. So I guess it must return the number of... (3 Replies)
I think both write at the end of the file ......
but is there a sharp difference between those 2 instruction .....
thank you
this is my 3rd question today forgive me :D (1 Reply)
Hi,
We are facing issues while backing up our 1205 GB filesystem on LTO5 Tape. During backup the "backup: The lseek call failed." messages were generated, I want to know why these messages were generating
AIX version is: 6100-08-00-0000
backup: The date of this level 0 backup is Mon Mar 11... (4 Replies)
The following code:
int fd;
if (fd = open("mem", O_RDONLY) == -1)
return 1;
if (lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET) == -1) {
char *buf = malloc(512);
buf = strerror(errno);
printf("%s\n", buf);
return 1;
}
always returns with "illegal seek"... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Sir_Tomasz
2 Replies
LEARN ABOUT POSIX
lseek64
LSEEK64(3) Linux Programmer's Manual LSEEK64(3)NAME
lseek64 - reposition 64-bit read/write file offset
SYNOPSIS
#define _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE /* See feature_test_macros(7) */
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <unistd.h>
off64_t lseek64(int fd, off64_t offset, int whence);
DESCRIPTION
The lseek(2) family of functions reposition the offset of the open file associated with the file descriptor fd to offset bytes relative to
the start, current position, or end of the file, when whence has the value SEEK_SET, SEEK_CUR, or SEEK_END, respectively.
For more details, return value, and errors, see lseek(2).
Four interfaces are available: lseek(2), lseek64(), llseek(2), and _llseek(2).
lseek()
Prototype:
off_t lseek(int fd, off_t offset, int whence);
lseek(2) uses the type off_t. This is a 32-bit signed type on 32-bit architectures, unless one compiles with
#define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64
in which case it is a 64-bit signed type.
lseek64()
Prototype:
off64_t lseek64(int fd, off64_t offset, int whence);
The library routine lseek64() uses a 64-bit type even when off_t is a 32-bit type. Its prototype (and the type off64_t) is available only
when one compiles with
#define _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
The function lseek64() is available since glibc 2.1, and is defined to be an alias for llseek().
llseek()
Prototype:
loff_t llseek(int fd, loff_t offset, int whence);
The type loff_t is a 64-bit signed type. The library routine llseek() is available in glibc and works without special defines. However,
the glibc headers do not provide a prototype. Users should add the above prototype, or something equivalent, to their own source. When
users complained about data loss caused by a miscompilation of e2fsck(8), glibc 2.1.3 added the link-time warning
"the `llseek' function may be dangerous; use `lseek64' instead."
This makes this function unusable if one desires a warning-free compilation.
_llseek()
On 32-bit architectures, this is the system call that is used to implement all of the above functions. The prototype is:
int _llseek(int fd, off_t offset_hi, off_t offset_lo,
loff_t *result, int whence);
For more details, see llseek(2).
64-bit systems don't need an _llseek() system call. Instead, they have an lseek(2) system call that supports 64-bit file offsets.
ATTRIBUTES
For an explanation of the terms used in this section, see attributes(7).
+----------+---------------+---------+
|Interface | Attribute | Value |
+----------+---------------+---------+
|lseek64() | Thread safety | MT-Safe |
+----------+---------------+---------+
SEE ALSO llseek(2), lseek(2)COLOPHON
This page is part of release 4.15 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, information about reporting bugs, and the
latest version of this page, can be found at https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/.
Linux 2017-09-15 LSEEK64(3)