RENAME(2)						     Linux Programmer's Manual							 RENAME(2)

NAME

       rename - change the name or location of a file

SYNOPSIS

       #include <stdio.h>

       int rename(const char *oldpath, const char *newpath);

DESCRIPTION

       rename renames a file, moving it between directories if required.

       Any other hard links to the file (as created using link(2)) are unaffected.

       If  newpath  already  exists  it will be atomically replaced (subject to a few conditions - see ERRORS below), so that there is no point at
       which another process attempting to access newpath will find it missing.

       If newpath exists but the operation fails for some reason rename guarantees to leave an instance of newpath in place.

       However, when overwriting there will probably be a window in which both oldpath and newpath refer to the file being renamed.

       If oldpath refers to a symbolic link the link is renamed; if newpath refers to a symbolic link the link will be overwritten.

RETURN VALUE

       On success, zero is returned.  On error, -1 is returned, and errno is set appropriately.

ERRORS

       EISDIR newpath is an existing directory, but oldpath is not a directory.

       EXDEV  oldpath and newpath are not on the same filesystem.

       ENOTEMPTY or EEXIST
	      newpath is a non-empty directory, i.e., contains entries other than "." and "..".

       EBUSY  The rename fails because oldpath or newpath is a directory that is in use by some process (perhaps as current working directory,	or
	      as  root	directory,  or	because it was open for reading) or is in use by the system (for example as mount point), while the system
	      considers this an error.	(Note that there is no requirement to return EBUSY in such cases - there is nothing wrong with	doing  the
	      rename anyway - but it is allowed to return EBUSY if the system cannot otherwise handle such situations.)

       EINVAL The  new	pathname contained a path prefix of the old, or, more generally, an attempt was made to make a directory a subdirectory of
	      itself.

       EMLINK oldpath already has the maximum number of links to it, or it was a directory and the directory containing newpath  has  the  maximum
	      number of links.

       ENOTDIR
	      A  component used as a directory in oldpath or newpath is not, in fact, a directory.  Or, oldpath is a directory, and newpath exists
	      but is not a directory.

       EFAULT oldpath or newpath points outside your accessible address space.

       EACCES Write access to the directory containing oldpath or newpath is not allowed for the process's effective uid, or one of  the  directo-
	      ries  in oldpath or newpath did not allow search (execute) permission, or oldpath was a directory and did not allow write permission
	      (needed to update the ..	entry).

       EPERM or EACCES
	      The directory containing oldpath has the sticky bit set and the process's effective uid is neither that of root nor the uid  of  the
	      file  to	be deleted nor that of the directory containing it, or newpath is an existing file and the directory containing it has the
	      sticky bit set and the process's effective uid is neither that of root nor the uid of the file to be replaced nor that of the direc-
	      tory containing it, or the filesystem containing pathname does not support renaming of the type requested.

       ENAMETOOLONG
	      oldpath or newpath was too long.

       ENOENT A directory component in oldpath	or  newpath does not exist or is a dangling symbolic link.

       ENOMEM Insufficient kernel memory was available.

       EROFS  The file is on a read-only filesystem.

       ELOOP  Too many symbolic links were encountered in resolving oldpath or newpath.

       ENOSPC The device containing the file has no room for the new directory entry.

CONFORMING TO

       POSIX, 4.3BSD, ANSI C

BUGS

       On  NFS filesystems, you can not assume that if the operation failed the file was not renamed.  If the server does the rename operation and
       then crashes, the retransmitted RPC which will be processed when the server is up again causes a failure.  The application is  expected	to
       deal with this.	See link(2) for a similar problem.

SEE ALSO

       link(2), unlink(2), symlink(2), mv(1)

Linux 2.0							    1998-06-04								 RENAME(2)