Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Cleaning Message Queues
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting Cleaning Message Queues Post 302529496 by Corona688 on Thursday 9th of June 2011 11:57:37 AM
Old 06-09-2011
How are you killing this process? It's possible that if you let it shutdown cleanly it may delete them itself.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

Message queues

Hi all, I've been trying for hours to figure out how to turn my 2-program (one to send and one to receive) "chat system" using message queues, into a single program where each concurrent component (entity) will both send and receive messages. PLEASE give me a hand with this, I'm starting to... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: mgchato
9 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

message queues

let 3 processes a, b and c are sharing msgs using msg queues.process 'a' sending msg to 'c' and in turn 'c' send sthat msg to 'b'.if something happens to c how can 'a' and 'b' know that 'c' is not available?????? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: sukaam
2 Replies

3. Solaris

rogue message queues solaris 9

We have message queues created from our ERP system to our tax system via an application api written by the ERP software vendor. Occasionally when a user does not gracefully exit the ERP application, the message queue hangs. After a few months, this becomes a problem as the queues are all used... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: MizzGail
2 Replies

4. Linux

maximun number of message queues

how to check the maximun number of message queues in current linux enviornment? is there any command ? (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: princelinux
4 Replies

5. Programming

shared memory and message queues

Hi, According to my understanding.. When message queues are used, when a process post a message in the queue and if another process reads it from the queue then the queue will be empty unlike shared memory where n number of processess can access the shared memory and still the contents remain... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: rvan
2 Replies

6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

UNIX Message Queues vs. Sockets

If I use sockets for IPC, and can easily distribute my applications. UNIX Message Queues are local to the processor. As I understand it, Message Queues still incur system call overhead, just like socket calls. What advantage does a UNIX Message Queue provide versus a TCP or UDP Socket,... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: zen29sky
2 Replies

7. Programming

message queues and multi-process

Hi, Am supposed to use message queues to send and receive messages between the processes. when i was working on that i realised that the message qid and the message queue related data should be maintained in a shared memory so that it can be accessed by all the processes. Could anybody refer... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: rvan
10 Replies

8. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

message queues

#include <sys/ipc.h> #include <sys/msg.h> int main() { int qid; int t; struct msgbuf mesg; qid=msgget(IPC_PRIVATE,IPC_CREAT); mesg.mtype=1L; mesg.mtext=1; t=msgsnd(qid,&mesg,1,0); printf("%d",t); } the program prints -1 as the result of msgsnd ,which means that msgsnd doesn't... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: tolkki
1 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

message queues

can any body provide a tutorial that explains the concept of message queues in UNIX in great detail (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: asalman.qazi
1 Replies

10. Programming

Persisting message queues to disk

Hi, I have searched the forums and could not find a relavant thread discussing my use case, hence the new post. Basically am trying to pass on work to dummy worker instances from controller which will pass on work to workers (client) To make use of host capacity, am planning to serialize... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: matrixmadhan
2 Replies
SYSTEMD.KILL(5) 						   systemd.kill 						   SYSTEMD.KILL(5)

NAME
systemd.kill - Process killing procedure configuration SYNOPSIS
service.service, socket.socket, mount.mount, swap.swap, scope.scope DESCRIPTION
Unit configuration files for services, sockets, mount points, swap devices and scopes share a subset of configuration options which define the killing procedure of processes belonging to the unit. This man page lists the configuration options shared by these five unit types. See systemd.unit(5) for the common options shared by all unit configuration files, and systemd.service(5), systemd.socket(5), systemd.swap(5), systemd.mount(5) and systemd.scope(5) for more information on the configuration file options specific to each unit type. The kill procedure configuration options are configured in the [Service], [Socket], [Mount] or [Swap] section, depending on the unit type. OPTIONS
KillMode= Specifies how processes of this unit shall be killed. One of control-group, process, mixed, none. If set to control-group, all remaining processes in the control group of this unit will be killed on unit stop (for services: after the stop command is executed, as configured with ExecStop=). If set to process, only the main process itself is killed. If set to mixed, the SIGTERM signal (see below) is sent to the main process while the subsequent SIGKILL signal (see below) is sent to all remaining processes of the unit's control group. If set to none, no process is killed. In this case, only the stop command will be executed on unit stop, but no process be killed otherwise. Processes remaining alive after stop are left in their control group and the control group continues to exist after stop unless it is empty. Processes will first be terminated via SIGTERM (unless the signal to send is changed via KillSignal=). Optionally, this is immediately followed by a SIGHUP (if enabled with SendSIGHUP=). If then, after a delay (configured via the TimeoutStopSec= option), processes still remain, the termination request is repeated with the SIGKILL signal (unless this is disabled via the SendSIGKILL= option). See kill(2) for more information. Defaults to control-group. KillSignal= Specifies which signal to use when killing a service. This controls the signal that is sent as first step of shutting down a unit (see above), and is usually followed by SIGKILL (see above and below). For a list of valid signals, see signal(7). Defaults to SIGTERM. Note that, right after sending the signal specified in this setting, systemd will always send SIGCONT, to ensure that even suspended tasks can be terminated cleanly. SendSIGHUP= Specifies whether to send SIGHUP to remaining processes immediately after sending the signal configured with KillSignal=. This is useful to indicate to shells and shell-like programs that their connection has been severed. Takes a boolean value. Defaults to "no". SendSIGKILL= Specifies whether to send SIGKILL to remaining processes after a timeout, if the normal shutdown procedure left processes of the service around. Takes a boolean value. Defaults to "yes". SEE ALSO
systemd(1), systemctl(1), journalctl(8), systemd.unit(5), systemd.service(5), systemd.socket(5), systemd.swap(5), systemd.mount(5), systemd.exec(5), systemd.directives(7), kill(2), signal(7) systemd 237 SYSTEMD.KILL(5)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:53 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy