Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Virtualization problems
Special Forums UNIX and Linux Applications Virtualization and Cloud Computing Virtualization problems Post 302519009 by danilosevilla on Monday 2nd of May 2011 07:25:16 PM
Old 05-02-2011
Someone knows

Hi there, in reference to the this post, someone have any clue??? Smilie .. .thanks a lot.
Danilo.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

Virtualization with Solaris 10

Hello all, For my internship assignment I have a Sunfire 880 at my disposal for comparing virtualization with the normal mostly Windows based servers in the company. Are there any applications like VirtualBox or Vmware that can be used on a Sparc-system equipped with Solaris 10? I tried... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: regi86
1 Replies

2. Virtualization and Cloud Computing

Virtualization problem

Hi, I am having a virtualization problem with a machine that runs on Fedora Core 4. I created a IDE virtual machine running FEDORA CORE 4. Then I restored the original servers partition one by one. Everything works until I restore root. Then When I load up I get mount: error 6 mounting ext3... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: mojoman
1 Replies

3. Virtualization and Cloud Computing

Hardware virtualization

Hello to all In my organization we want to pass to move the systems to an virtualized environment, nevertheless, considering the absence of resources, the idea is to acquire the versers and that the department (I) do the facilities, tests, etc. Wearing out the possible minimal cost in... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: aalvarez77
1 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Virtualization Related Help!!

Hi, My script needs to find out if it is running on a virtual machine. If it is then it needs to find out. 1 . The number of virtual processors. 2 . Actual physical box onto which the virtual machine is hosted. 3 .Processors on the physical machine. Actually there are some commands like... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: prasi_in
1 Replies

5. HP-UX

Virtualization Software

Hello peopel I am interesting in implement a virtualization system on HP-UX v3. I have some Integrity servers with this OS installed but I want to virtualize one of them because I have a problem that has no solution in HP-UX and I have to install RedHat for this reason. Then I don't know what... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Lekram
1 Replies

6. Red Hat

Redhat Virtualization 2.2

Hi Friends, Is there any one who is working on Redhat Virtualization (RHEV -- KVM)? Regards, Arumon (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: arumon
4 Replies

7. HP-UX

Virtualization options for HP-UX 11.31

Hello, I am looking for a virtualization option for HP-UX that will allow VMs to run completely independent of each other with full Operating System capabilities (not a guest OS with limited features/access), with their own IP addresses and dedicated resources that will not interfere with any... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: bstring
4 Replies

8. Linux

Virtualization best practices

Hello admins and gurus I have a controversial topic: now we are investing in a new Linux OS that will hold our Sybase database. The server will virtualized on a VMware server hosted on SAN storage. Now the question is, when we install the database engine is it better - in terms of performance -... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: abohmeed
1 Replies

9. Virtualization and Cloud Computing

Virtualization on vmware

Got tired of messing around with real hardware old and others.. Decided to spend some $$ for a QUAD-core dual cpu laptop with 8 gig of ram and 1 TB disk space.. running VMware workstation 10 on windows 8.0 , with a pair of solx86 vcs 5.1 cluster and a pair of rhel 6.4 vcs 6.x cluster.. ... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: ppchu99
0 Replies

10. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Solaris Virtualization

Hello All, To start with, I am not an expert of solaris and VMs. Unfortunately, I can't find a direct or understandable (at least to me) answer to my question online. So please, excuse me if my question will sound dumb to you. :o We have 2 remaining solaris 8 servers are on sparc... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: forextrafun
9 Replies
Hook::LexWrap(3)					User Contributed Perl Documentation					  Hook::LexWrap(3)

NAME
Hook::LexWrap - Lexically scoped subroutine wrappers VERSION
This document describes version 0.23 of Hook::LexWrap. SYNOPSIS
use Hook::LexWrap; sub doit { print "[doit:", caller, "]"; return {my=>"data"} } SCOPED: { wrap doit, pre => sub { print "[pre1: @_] " }, post => sub { print "[post1:@_] "; $_[1]=9; }; my $temporarily = wrap doit, post => sub { print "[post2:@_] " }, pre => sub { print "[pre2: @_] "}; @args = (1,2,3); doit(@args); # pre2->pre1->doit->post1->post2 } @args = (4,5,6); doit(@args); # pre1->doit->post1 DESCRIPTION
Hook::LexWrap allows you to install a pre- or post-wrapper (or both) around an existing subroutine. Unlike other modules that provide this capacity (e.g. Hook::PreAndPost and Hook::WrapSub), Hook::LexWrap implements wrappers in such a way that the standard "caller" function works correctly within the wrapped subroutine. To install a prewrappers, you write: use Hook::LexWrap; wrap 'subroutine_name', pre => &some_other_sub; #or: wrap *subroutine_name, pre => &some_other_sub; The first argument to "wrap" is a string containing the name of the subroutine to be wrapped (or the typeglob containing it, or a reference to it). The subroutine name may be qualified, and the subroutine must already be defined. The second argument indicates the type of wrapper being applied and must be either 'pre' or 'post'. The third argument must be a reference to a subroutine that implements the wrapper. To install a post-wrapper, you write: wrap 'subroutine_name', post => &yet_another_sub; #or: wrap *subroutine_name, post => &yet_another_sub; To install both at once: wrap 'subroutine_name', pre => &some_other_sub, post => &yet_another_sub; or: wrap *subroutine_name, post => &yet_another_sub, # order in which wrappers are pre => &some_other_sub; # specified doesn't matter Once they are installed, the pre- and post-wrappers will be called before and after the subroutine itself, and will be passed the same argument list. The pre- and post-wrappers and the original subroutine also all see the same (correct!) values from "caller" and "wantarray". Short-circuiting and long-circuiting return values The pre- and post-wrappers both receive an extra argument in their @_ arrays. That extra argument is appended to the original argument list (i.e. is can always be accessed as $_[-1]) and acts as a place-holder for the original subroutine's return value. In a pre-wrapper, $_[-1] is -- for obvious reasons -- "undef". However, $_[-1] may be assigned to in a pre-wrapper, in which case Hook::LexWrap assumes that the original subroutine has been "pre-empted", and that neither it, nor the corresponding post-wrapper, nor any wrappers that were applied before the pre-empting pre-wrapper was installed, need be run. Note that any post-wrappers that were installed after the pre-empting pre-wrapper was installed will still be called before the original subroutine call returns. In a post-wrapper, $_[-1] contains the return value produced by the wrapped subroutine. In a scalar return context, this value is the scalar return value. In an list return context, this value is a reference to the array of return values. $_[-1] may be assigned to in a post-wrapper, and this changes the return value accordingly. Access to the arguments and return value is useful for implementing techniques such as memoization: my %cache; wrap fibonacci, pre => sub { $_[-1] = $cache{$_[0]} if $cache{$_[0]} }, post => sub { $cache{$_[0]} = $_[-1] }; or for converting arguments and return values in a consistent manner: # set_temp expects and returns degrees Fahrenheit, # but we want to use Celsius wrap set_temp, pre => sub { splice @_, 0, 1, $_[0] * 1.8 + 32 }, post => sub { $_[-1] = ($_[0] - 32) / 1.8 }; Lexically scoped wrappers Normally, any wrappers installed by "wrap" remain attached to the subroutine until it is undefined. However, it is possible to make specific wrappers lexically bound, so that they operate only until the end of the scope in which they're created (or until some other specific point in the code). If "wrap" is called in a non-void context: my $lexical = wrap 'sub_name', pre => &wrapper; it returns a special object corresponding to the particular wrapper being placed around the original subroutine. When that object is destroyed -- when its container variable goes out of scope, or when its reference count otherwise falls to zero (e.g. "undef $lexical"), or when it is explicitly destroyed ("$lexical->DESTROY") -- the corresponding wrapper is removed from around the original subroutine. Note, however, that all other wrappers around the subroutine are preserved. Anonymous wrappers If the subroutine to be wrapped is passed as a reference (rather than by name or by typeglob), "wrap" does not install the wrappers around the original subroutine. Instead it generates a new subroutine which acts as if it were the original with those wrappers around it. It then returns a reference to that new subroutine. Only calls to the original through that wrapped reference invoke the wrappers. Direct by- name calls to the original, or calls through another reference, do not. If the original is subsequently wrapped by name, the anonymously wrapped subroutine reference does not see those wrappers. In other words, wrappers installed via a subroutine reference are completely independent of those installed via the subroutine's name (or typeglob). For example: sub original { print "ray" } # Wrap anonymously... my $anon_wrapped = wrap &original, pre => sub { print "do..." }; # Show effects... original(); # prints "ray" $anon_wrapped->(); # prints "do..ray" # Wrap nonymously... wrap *original, pre => sub { print "fa.." }, post => sub { print "..mi" }; # Show effects... original(); # now prints "fa..ray..mi" $anon_wrapped->(); # still prints "do...ray" DIAGNOSTICS
"Can't wrap non-existent subroutine %s" An attempt was made to wrap a subroutine that was not defined at the point of wrapping. "'pre' value is not a subroutine reference" The value passed to "wrap" after the 'pre' flag was not a subroutine reference. Typically, someone forgot the "sub" on the anonymous subroutine: wrap 'subname', pre => { your_code_here() }; and Perl interpreted the last argument as a hash constructor. "'post' value is not a subroutine reference" The value passed to "wrap" after the 'post' flag was not a subroutine reference. "Uselessly wrapped subroutine reference in void context" (warning only) When the subroutine to be wrapped is passed as a subroutine reference, "wrap" does not install the wrapper around the original, but instead returns a reference to a subroutine which wraps the original (see "Anonymous wrappers"). However, there's no point in doing this if you don't catch the resulting subroutine reference. AUTHOR
Damian Conway (damian@conway.org) BLAME
Schwern made me do this (by implying it wasn't possible ;-) BUGS
There are undoubtedly serious bugs lurking somewhere in code this funky :-) Bug reports and other feedback are most welcome. SEE ALSO
Sub::Prepend COPYRIGHT
Copyright (c) 2001, Damian Conway. All Rights Reserved. This module is free software. It may be used, redistributed and/or modified under the same terms as Perl itself. perl v5.18.2 2017-10-06 Hook::LexWrap(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:59 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy