Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Help with Ulimit Setting
Top Forums UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Help with Ulimit Setting Post 302517676 by wcrober on Wednesday 27th of April 2011 12:25:23 PM
Old 04-27-2011
Help with Ulimit Setting

All,
Our SA is considering setting the max open files from 2048 to 30K. This sounds like a drastic change. Does anybody have an idea of the negative impacts of increasing the open files too high? Would like to know if this change could negatively impact our system. What test should we run to ensure we don't break production.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

ulimit setting problem on Solaris

How do you make the ulimit values permanent for a user? by default, the root login has the following ulimits: # ulimit -a time(seconds) unlimited file(blocks) unlimited data(kbytes) unlimited stack(kbytes) 8192 coredump(blocks) unlimited nofiles(descriptors) 1024 memory(kbytes)... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: kiem
2 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

Setting Ulimit

How do i set ulimit for user (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: Krrishv
4 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

setting ulimit -n with a value more than 1024000

I would like to set the maximum number or open files per process to be greater than 1024000 (for specific application scalability purpose). I am using RHEL 5.3/Ext4. %sysctl fs.file-max fs.file-max = 164766821 I also have added the folloing to /etc/security/limits.conf * ... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: Hsianglung Wu
7 Replies

4. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Setting Ulimit problem

I changed the standard Ulimit sometime back. But when I change it back, the setting does not get updated. How do I make the change permanent Waitstejo (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: Waitstejo
7 Replies

5. Solaris

ulimit

how do i check the ulimit set on my server.. ca i know whats the command ?? thanks in advance .. (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: expert
5 Replies

6. Solaris

ulimit

Hello, could you help me please? I write in command line: "ulimit 500" -> i've set the max size of 512-bytes blocks that i can write in one file. But when after it i use ulimit.3c in my program: "ulimit(UL_GETFSIZE);" the result turns out 1000. Why is it so? They always differ so that one is... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Zhenya_
2 Replies

7. Red Hat

setting ulimit for a user

The root user runs the following ulimit -a | grep open and gets a result of open files (-n) 8162 A user runs the same command and gets a result of open files (-n) 2500 How can you set the ulimit of the user to... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: jsanders
2 Replies

8. Solaris

Is there a difference between setting a user as nologin and setting it as a role?

Trying to figure out the best method of security for oracle user accounts. In Solaris 10 they are set as regular users but have nologin set forcing the dev's to login as themselves and then su to the oracle users. In Solaris11 we have the option of making it a role because RBAC is enabled but... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: os2mac
1 Replies

9. AIX

Ulimit setting

Hi, Our application team is asking me to set ulimit parameter in my AIX 6.1 TL8 box. Some of them i set already. address space limit (kbytes) (-M) unlimited locks (-L) unlimited locked address space (kbytes) (-l) 64 nice (-e) ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: sunnybee
3 Replies

10. Solaris

Help with setting coredumpsize using ulimit

A coredump is being created by one of our applications on Solaris server and occupying entire space on the mount, thereby bringing down the application. While we try to identify the root cause, i tried to limit to limit the size of the core dump. Executed below command in shell and also updated... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: kesani
2 Replies
Perl::Critic::Policy::InputOutput::RequireBriefOpen(3pm)User Contributed Perl DocumentatioPerl::Critic::Policy::InputOutput::RequireBriefOpen(3pm)

NAME
Perl::Critic::Policy::InputOutput::RequireBriefOpen - Close filehandles as soon as possible after opening them. AFFILIATION
This Policy is part of the core Perl::Critic distribution. DESCRIPTION
One way that production systems fail unexpectedly is by running out of filehandles. Filehandles are a finite resource on every operating system that I'm aware of, and running out of them is virtually impossible to recover from. The solution is to not run out in the first place. What causes programs to run out of filehandles? Usually, it's leaks: you open a filehandle and forget to close it, or just wait a really long time before closing it. This problem is rarely exposed by test systems, because the tests rarely run long enough or have enough load to hit the filehandle limit. So, the best way to avoid the problem is 1) always close all filehandles that you open and 2) close them as soon as is practical. This policy takes note of calls to "open()" where there is no matching "close()" call within "N" lines of code. If you really need to do a lot of processing on an open filehandle, then you can move that processing to another method like this: sub process_data_file { my ($self, $filename) = @_; open my $fh, '<', $filename or croak 'Failed to read datafile ' . $filename . '; ' . $OS_ERROR; $self->_parse_input_data($fh); close $fh; return; } sub _parse_input_data { my ($self, $fh) = @_; while (my $line = <$fh>) { ... } return; } As a special case, this policy also allows code to return the filehandle after the "open" instead of closing it. Just like the close, however, that "return" has to be within the right number of lines. From there, you're on your own to figure out whether the code is promptly closing the filehandle. The STDIN, STDOUT, and STDERR handles are exempt from this policy. CONFIGURATION
This policy allows "close()" invocations to be up to "N" lines after their corresponding "open()" calls, where "N" defaults to 9. You can override this to set it to a different number with the "lines" setting. To do this, put entries in a .perlcriticrc file like this: [InputOutput::RequireBriefOpen] lines = 5 CAVEATS
"IO::File->new" This policy only looks for explicit "open" calls. It does not detect calls to "CORE::open" or "IO::File->new" or the like. Is it the right lexical? We don't currently check for redeclared filehandles. So the following code is false negative, for example, because the outer scoped filehandle is not closed: open my $fh, '<', $file1 or croak; if (open my $fh, '<', $file2) { print <$fh>; close $fh; } This is a contrived example, but it isn't uncommon for people to use $fh for the name of the filehandle every time. Perhaps it's time to think of better variable names... CREDITS
Initial development of this policy was supported by a grant from the Perl Foundation. AUTHOR
Chris Dolan <cdolan@cpan.org> COPYRIGHT
Copyright (c) 2007-2011 Chris Dolan. Many rights reserved. This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. The full text of this license can be found in the LICENSE file included with this module perl v5.14.2 2012-06-07 Perl::Critic::Policy::InputOutput::RequireBriefOpen(3pm)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:41 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy