Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: tail -f for multiple files
Top Forums Shell Programming and Scripting tail -f for multiple files Post 302508157 by theboogymaster on Saturday 26th of March 2011 08:02:22 AM
Old 03-26-2011
Cool thanks for the info.. I'll give it a try.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

Tail-alike display of new files in directory

The system I work on, produces several kinds of status-files in a single directory. I would like to be able to see the files as they are added to this directory. I was wondering if it would be possible to get a "tail -f" alike view of the ls-command, in such a way that a newly added file is... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: rschelkers
4 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Constantly updating log files (tail -f? grep? awk?)

I have a log file which is continuously added to, called log.file. I'd like to monitor this file, and when certain lines are found, update some totals in another file. I've played around with tail -f, grep, and awk, but can't seem to hit the right note, so to speak. The lines I'm... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: nortonloaf
0 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

Drop common lines at head/tail of a large set of files

Hi! I have a large set of pairs of text files (each pair in their own subdirectory) and each pair shares head/tail (a couple of first and last lines) but differs in the middle part. I need to delete the heads/tails and keep only the middle portions in which they differ. The lengths of heads/tails... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: dobryden
1 Replies

4. Solaris

Tail for multiple files

Hi there, I'm trying to run a simple command in Solaris 10: tail -10 *.log But this gives me in the output just last 10 rows of a SINGLE log file :eek: (and there are many in active directory). Please, do you have any idea what's the problem? :confused: Is it a Solaris issue? Thank you in... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: MartinF
2 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Using AWK: Extract data from multiple files and output to multiple new files

Hi, I'd like to process multiple files. For example: file1.txt file2.txt file3.txt Each file contains several lines of data. I want to extract a piece of data and output it to a new file. file1.txt ----> newfile1.txt file2.txt ----> newfile2.txt file3.txt ----> newfile3.txt Here is... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Liverpaul09
3 Replies

6. Shell Programming and Scripting

head / tail combination returns multiple rows

Hi, As part of our project, we need to load historical data for a year before our system is live. We have the data feed files that we need to load. However, I need to make sure that the file structure (number of fields separated by a comma) on the field is same for all the files of the same... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: raj.jha
1 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Multiple tail -f commands

I need to execute a program which will generate some alarms. I wish to capture those alarms in a single output file. I executed with following command on linux: tail -f test1.alarms -f test2.alarms|awk 'NR>20' >> output But however when I tried to execute same on solaris platforms it fails.... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: bhallarandeep
2 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

how to run tail -f for 3 log files from a script

hi i need to run from a bash script tail -f /var/log/access_log >> access1 tail -f /var/log/prod/prod1 >> access1 tail -f /var/log/prod/prod2 >> access1 this script purpose is to start at server boot time and should always run. what is the best way to put it on a script Thanks Dan (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: dan12341234
1 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

prevent multiple tail in back ground

Dears i have a scrip run in unix that need to use the tail -f command, as below: DATE=`date '+%m%d%y'` tail -f /var/messages | grep "start" >> /export/logs/start_${DATE}.out but the problem that the tail -f will be stop and working in the background in then end of the day (23:59:59)... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: thehero
0 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

Joining multiple files tail on tail

I have 250 files that have 16 columns each - all numbered as follows stat.1000, stat.1001, stat.1002, stat.1003....stat.1250. I would like to join all 250 of them together tail by tail as follows. For example stat.1000 a b c d e f stat.1001 g h i j k l So that my output... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: kayak
2 Replies
ExtUtils::MakeMaker::FAQ(3)				User Contributed Perl Documentation			       ExtUtils::MakeMaker::FAQ(3)

NAME
ExtUtils::MakeMaker::FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions About MakeMaker DESCRIPTION
FAQs, tricks and tips for "ExtUtils::MakeMaker". Module Installation How do I install a module into my home directory? If you're not the Perl administrator you probably don't have permission to install a module to its default location. Then you should install it for your own use into your home directory like so: # Non-unix folks, replace ~ with /path/to/your/home/dir perl Makefile.PL INSTALL_BASE=~ This will put modules into ~/lib/perl5, man pages into ~/man and programs into ~/bin. To ensure your Perl programs can see these newly installed modules, set your "PERL5LIB" environment variable to ~/lib/perl5 or tell each of your programs to look in that directory with the following: use lib "$ENV{HOME}/lib/perl5"; or if $ENV{HOME} isn't set and you don't want to set it for some reason, do it the long way. use lib "/path/to/your/home/dir/lib/perl5"; How do I get MakeMaker and Module::Build to install to the same place? Module::Build, as of 0.28, supports two ways to install to the same location as MakeMaker. We highly recommend the install_base method, its the simplest and most closely approximates the expected behavior of an installation prefix. 1) Use INSTALL_BASE / "--install_base" MakeMaker (as of 6.31) and Module::Build (as of 0.28) both can install to the same locations using the "install_base" concept. See "INSTALL_BASE" in ExtUtils::MakeMaker for details. To get MM and MB to install to the same location simply set INSTALL_BASE in MM and "--install_base" in MB to the same location. perl Makefile.PL INSTALL_BASE=/whatever perl Build.PL --install_base /whatever This works most like other language's behavior when you specify a prefix. We recommend this method. 2) Use PREFIX / "--prefix" Module::Build 0.28 added support for "--prefix" which works like MakeMaker's PREFIX. perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=/whatever perl Build.PL --prefix /whatever We highly discourage this method. It should only be used if you know what you're doing and specifically need the PREFIX behavior. The PREFIX algorithm is complicated and focused on matching the system installation. How do I keep from installing man pages? Recent versions of MakeMaker will only install man pages on Unix-like operating systems. For an individual module: perl Makefile.PL INSTALLMAN1DIR=none INSTALLMAN3DIR=none If you want to suppress man page installation for all modules you have to reconfigure Perl and tell it 'none' when it asks where to install man pages. How do I use a module without installing it? Two ways. One is to build the module normally... perl Makefile.PL make make test ...and then set the PERL5LIB environment variable to point at the blib/lib and blib/arch directories. The other is to install the module in a temporary location. perl Makefile.PL INSTALL_BASE=~/tmp make make test make install And then set PERL5LIB to ~/tmp/lib/perl5. This works well when you have multiple modules to work with. It also ensures that the module goes through its full installation process which may modify it. PREFIX vs INSTALL_BASE from Module::Build::Cookbook The behavior of PREFIX is complicated and depends closely on how your Perl is configured. The resulting installation locations will vary from machine to machine and even different installations of Perl on the same machine. Because of this, its difficult to document where prefix will place your modules. In contrast, INSTALL_BASE has predictable, easy to explain installation locations. Now that Module::Build and MakeMaker both have INSTALL_BASE there is little reason to use PREFIX other than to preserve your existing installation locations. If you are starting a fresh Perl installation we encourage you to use INSTALL_BASE. If you have an existing installation installed via PREFIX, consider moving it to an installation structure matching INSTALL_BASE and using that instead. Common errors and problems "No rule to make target `/usr/lib/perl5/CORE/config.h', needed by `Makefile'" Just what it says, you're missing that file. MakeMaker uses it to determine if perl has been rebuilt since the Makefile was made. It's a bit of a bug that it halts installation. Some operating systems don't ship the CORE directory with their base perl install. To solve the problem, you likely need to install a perl development package such as perl-devel (CentOS, Fedora and other Redhat systems) or perl (Ubuntu and other Debian systems). Philosophy and History Why not just use <insert other build config tool here>? Why did MakeMaker reinvent the build configuration wheel? Why not just use autoconf or automake or ppm or Ant or ... There are many reasons, but the major one is cross-platform compatibility. Perl is one of the most ported pieces of software ever. It works on operating systems I've never even heard of (see perlport for details). It needs a build tool that can work on all those platforms and with any wacky C compilers and linkers they might have. No such build tool exists. Even make itself has wildly different dialects. So we have to build our own. What is Module::Build and how does it relate to MakeMaker? Module::Build is a project by Ken Williams to supplant MakeMaker. Its primary advantages are: o pure perl. no make, no shell commands o easier to customize o cleaner internals o less cruft Module::Build is the official heir apparent to MakeMaker and we encourage people to work on M::B rather than spending time adding features to MakeMaker. Module Writing How do I keep my $VERSION up to date without resetting it manually? Often you want to manually set the $VERSION in the main module distribution because this is the version that everybody sees on CPAN and maybe you want to customize it a bit. But for all the other modules in your dist, $VERSION is really just bookkeeping and all that's important is it goes up every time the module is changed. Doing this by hand is a pain and you often forget. Simplest way to do it automatically is to use your version control system's revision number (you are using version control, right?). In CVS, RCS and SVN you use $Revision$ (see the documentation of your version control system for details). Every time the file is checked in the $Revision$ will be updated, updating your $VERSION. SVN uses a simple integer for $Revision$ so you can adapt it for your $VERSION like so: ($VERSION) = q$Revision$ =~ /(d+)/; In CVS and RCS version 1.9 is followed by 1.10. Since CPAN compares version numbers numerically we use a sprintf() to convert 1.9 to 1.009 and 1.10 to 1.010 which compare properly. $VERSION = sprintf "%d.%03d", q$Revision$ =~ /(d+).(d+)/g; If branches are involved (ie. $Revision: 1.5.3.4$) it's a little more complicated. # must be all on one line or MakeMaker will get confused. $VERSION = do { my @r = (q$Revision$ =~ /d+/g); sprintf "%d."."%03d" x $#r, @r }; In SVN, $Revision$ should be the same for every file in the project so they would all have the same $VERSION. CVS and RCS have a different $Revision$ per file so each file will have a different $VERSION. Distributed version control systems, such as SVK, may have a different $Revision$ based on who checks out the file, leading to a different $VERSION on each machine! Finally, some distributed version control systems, such as darcs, have no concept of revision number at all. What's this META.yml thing and how did it get in my MANIFEST?! META.yml is a module meta-data file pioneered by Module::Build and automatically generated as part of the 'distdir' target (and thus 'dist'). See "Module Meta-Data" in ExtUtils::MakeMaker. To shut off its generation, pass the "NO_META" flag to "WriteMakefile()". How do I delete everything not in my MANIFEST? Some folks are surprised that "make distclean" does not delete everything not listed in their MANIFEST (thus making a clean distribution) but only tells them what they need to delete. This is done because it is considered too dangerous. While developing your module you might write a new file, not add it to the MANIFEST, then run a "distclean" and be sad because your new work was deleted. If you really want to do this, you can use "ExtUtils::Manifest::manifind()" to read the MANIFEST and File::Find to delete the files. But you have to be careful. Here's a script to do that. Use at your own risk. Have fun blowing holes in your foot. #!/usr/bin/perl -w use strict; use File::Spec; use File::Find; use ExtUtils::Manifest qw(maniread); my %manifest = map {( $_ => 1 )} grep { File::Spec->canonpath($_) } keys %{ maniread() }; if( !keys %manifest ) { print "No files found in MANIFEST. Stopping. "; exit; } find({ wanted => sub { my $path = File::Spec->canonpath($_); return unless -f $path; return if exists $manifest{ $path }; print "unlink $path "; unlink $path; }, no_chdir => 1 }, "." ); Which tar should I use on Windows? We recommend ptar from Archive::Tar not older than 1.66 with '-C' option. Which zip should I use on Windows for '[nd]make zipdist'? We recommend InfoZIP: <http://www.info-zip.org/Zip.html> XS How do I prevent "object version X.XX does not match bootstrap parameter Y.YY" errors? XS code is very sensitive to the module version number and will complain if the version number in your Perl module doesn't match. If you change your module's version # without rerunning Makefile.PL the old version number will remain in the Makefile, causing the XS code to be built with the wrong number. To avoid this, you can force the Makefile to be rebuilt whenever you change the module containing the version number by adding this to your WriteMakefile() arguments. depend => { '$(FIRST_MAKEFILE)' => '$(VERSION_FROM)' } How do I make two or more XS files coexist in the same directory? Sometimes you need to have two and more XS files in the same package. One way to go is to put them into separate directories, but sometimes this is not the most suitable solution. The following technique allows you to put two (and more) XS files in the same directory. Let's assume that we have a package "Cool::Foo", which includes "Cool::Foo" and "Cool::Bar" modules each having a separate XS file. First we use the following Makefile.PL: use ExtUtils::MakeMaker; WriteMakefile( NAME => 'Cool::Foo', VERSION_FROM => 'Foo.pm', OBJECT => q/$(O_FILES)/, # ... other attrs ... ); Notice the "OBJECT" attribute. MakeMaker generates the following variables in Makefile: # Handy lists of source code files: XS_FILES= Bar.xs Foo.xs C_FILES = Bar.c Foo.c O_FILES = Bar.o Foo.o Therefore we can use the "O_FILES" variable to tell MakeMaker to use these objects into the shared library. That's pretty much it. Now write Foo.pm and Foo.xs, Bar.pm and Bar.xs, where Foo.pm bootstraps the shared library and Bar.pm simply loading Foo.pm. The only issue left is to how to bootstrap Bar.xs. This is done from Foo.xs: MODULE = Cool::Foo PACKAGE = Cool::Foo BOOT: # boot the second XS file boot_Cool__Bar(aTHX_ cv); If you have more than two files, this is the place where you should boot extra XS files from. The following four files sum up all the details discussed so far. Foo.pm: ------- package Cool::Foo; require DynaLoader; our @ISA = qw(DynaLoader); our $VERSION = '0.01'; bootstrap Cool::Foo $VERSION; 1; Bar.pm: ------- package Cool::Bar; use Cool::Foo; # bootstraps Bar.xs 1; Foo.xs: ------- #include "EXTERN.h" #include "perl.h" #include "XSUB.h" MODULE = Cool::Foo PACKAGE = Cool::Foo BOOT: # boot the second XS file boot_Cool__Bar(aTHX_ cv); MODULE = Cool::Foo PACKAGE = Cool::Foo PREFIX = cool_foo_ void cool_foo_perl_rules() CODE: fprintf(stderr, "Cool::Foo says: Perl Rules "); Bar.xs: ------- #include "EXTERN.h" #include "perl.h" #include "XSUB.h" MODULE = Cool::Bar PACKAGE = Cool::Bar PREFIX = cool_bar_ void cool_bar_perl_rules() CODE: fprintf(stderr, "Cool::Bar says: Perl Rules "); And of course a very basic test: t/cool.t: -------- use Test; BEGIN { plan tests => 1 }; use Cool::Foo; use Cool::Bar; Cool::Foo::perl_rules(); Cool::Bar::perl_rules(); ok 1; This tip has been brought to you by Nick Ing-Simmons and Stas Bekman. PATCHING
If you have a question you'd like to see added to the FAQ (whether or not you have the answer) please send it to makemaker@perl.org. AUTHOR
The denizens of makemaker@perl.org. SEE ALSO
ExtUtils::MakeMaker perl v5.16.3 2013-06-14 ExtUtils::MakeMaker::FAQ(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:31 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy