03-17-2011
Thank you so much for your help. I was able to get it to compile, but there are all kinds of problems in the output. I think this has nothing to do with the changes in the make, but rather with some size limits I have exceeded. These limits are not in a part of the code that I wrote, so I will have to dig in and try to locate the issue. I am going to temporarily go back to a previous version just in case any of my recent changes are part of the problem. Hopefully I can get it working properly with my old make and then I can look at restructuring the build directory again. I hope that will be tomorrow sometime, but I will post back when I get it working again.
LMHmedchem
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Red Hat
Hi,
i am trying to install AMBER10 which is a molecular dynamcis package onto two linux red hat pcs. I can successfully install the tools that comes with which uses gcc to compile, however AMBER10 requires either g95 or gfortran to compile. This is where the issue lies, i have installed both... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: olifu02
0 Replies
2. Programming
How I can get the current make-file name in a make-file
So, if I run make with specified file:make -f target.mak
is it possible to have the 'target' inside of the that 'target.mak' from the file name? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: alex_5161
2 Replies
3. Programming
Hi!
I have a program in fortran77. This program was compiled with pgf90, but now, I need compiled it with gfortran.
I show a bit of code.
program hello
PARAMETER(a=100)
integer a
write(*,*)'value ', a
end program hello
What's the problem?
Thanks (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: kekaes
2 Replies
4. Programming
Hi !
I have one program made of several sub programs which I am trying to compile with gfortran on Fedora 14 in my system. The program was originally written in Fortran 77 and compilation command used to be -
fort77 -O2 -f -w -o life life_com.f lifetime.f minuit.f tek_life.f utilities.f... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: cylab123
0 Replies
5. Programming
Hi,
I am trying to run a simple f77 program on gfortran. Program is as follows.
program trial
implicit real*8 (a-h,o-z)
common/var/a(2),b,c(4),d
a=(/0,0/)
b=0
c=(/0,0,0,0/)
d=0
call add(a,b,c,d)
... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: anshulfy
1 Replies
6. Programming
I am a INTEL fortran user recently migrated to linux and installed gfortran on my system.
I run numerical models as part of my research.
my question is on optimization of the fortran code.
I used the - vectorize option to compile for reducing the run time considerably and was happy. But... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: schamarthi1
1 Replies
7. Programming
Hello everyone,
I'm trying since a few days to compile a f90 program with gfortran (on Ubuntu) with a makefile. The fortran program calls 2 routines written in C.
Here is my makefile:
FC = gfortran
SFC = gfortran
FFLAGS = -ffree-form -O... (21 Replies)
Discussion started by: leroygr
21 Replies
8. Programming
I have code that works fine in ifort. But when trying to run on gfortran 4.7.1 (which does support quads and has no problem with real * 16) I can't cast an integer variable to a quad precision float (real*16) using something like:
factq(i) = factq(i-1) * qfloat(i)
Finding a list of the new... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: vibrantcascade
2 Replies
9. Programming
Hello
I am working on a CPP code written for SUN CC 5.5
and make
we used make to compile the code then it compilation went smooth
now i am using gmake:
I have a make file like this
WSROOT=..
include $(WSROOT)/etc/wsmkinclude.common
all:
@for subdir in */Makefile; \
do \... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Revathi R
1 Replies
10. Solaris
Hello
I am working on a CPP code written for SUN CC 5.5
and make
we used make to compile the code then it compilation went smooth
now i am using gmake:
I have a make file like this
WSROOT=..
include $(WSROOT)/etc/wsmkinclude.common
all:
@for subdir in */Makefile; \
do \... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Revathi R
1 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
set_color
set_color(1) fish set_color(1)
NAME
set_color - set_color - set the terminal color
set_color - set the terminal color
Synopsis
set_color [-v --version] [-h --help] [-b --background COLOR] [COLOR]
Description
Change the foreground and/or background color of the terminal. COLOR is one of black, red, green, brown, yellow, blue, magenta, purple,
cyan, white and normal.
o -b, --background Set the background color
o -c, --print-colors Prints a list of all valid color names
o -h, --help Display help message and exit
o -o, --bold Set bold or extra bright mode
o -u, --underline Set underlined mode
o -v, --version Display version and exit
Calling set_color normal will set the terminal color to whatever is the default color of the terminal.
Some terminals use the --bold escape sequence to switch to a brighter color set. On such terminals, set_color white will result in a grey
font color, while set_color --bold white will result in a white font color.
Not all terminal emulators support all these features. This is not a bug in set_color but a missing feature in the terminal emulator.
set_color uses the terminfo database to look up how to change terminal colors on whatever terminal is in use. Some systems have old and
incomplete terminfo databases, and may lack color information for terminals that support it. Download and install the latest version of
ncurses and recompile fish against it in order to fix this issue.
Version 1.23.1 Sun Jan 8 2012 set_color(1)