Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: sort a vector
Top Forums Programming sort a vector Post 302501707 by homeboy on Friday 4th of March 2011 10:25:24 AM
Old 03-04-2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corona688
The objects don't have to be const, it's enough that your function treats them as such; it's a safety feature. The references being const stops you from writing any members, and prevents you from calling any members or operators that aren't also const. You really don't want to be changing your data during a sort, especially when using the original, not a copy!
you're right,error went away without using reference.Thanks
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

Saving a vector to a file

Another C++ question, please do notify me if this forum is C-only! :) I'm having a vector... vector<Person> x; ... with a class I've defined (Person). I have several elements in this vector and I would like to save it to a file (binary (?)). And later on open up this file to retrieve... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: J.P
1 Replies

2. Programming

Linker error when using vector's

using SUN C++ I have a problem when I do a push_back on a vector. The linker gives me a undefined symbol error on __cxa_end_catch. Any ideas, is there a library to include? Thanks Chris (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: CDurkin
1 Replies

3. Programming

Vector Traversing

Hi i have the following structure struct S { char Mod_num; char val; char chr_nm_cd; } I am reading a 2GB file and inserting into the structure and writing into a vector. I feel like only vector will be a right option. I tried with multimap but it is memory intensive and hence i... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: dhanamurthy
1 Replies

4. Programming

multidimensional array using c++ vector

Hi! I need to make dynamic multidimensional arrays using the vector class. I found in this page How to dynamically create a two dimensional array? - Microsoft: Visual C++ FAQ - Tek-Tips the way to do it in 2D, and now i'm trying to expand it to 3D but i don't understand how is the operator working,... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: carl.alv
0 Replies

5. Programming

c++ mutidimentional arrays using vector

Hi! I need to make dynamic multidimensional arrays using the vector class. I found in this page How to dynamically create a two dimensional array? - Microsoft: Visual C++ FAQ - Tek-Tips the way to do it in 2D, and now i'm trying to expand it to 3D but i don't understand how is the operator working,... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: carl.alv
1 Replies

6. Programming

C++ Map using a Vector as a Value Type?

I modified some code I found on Wikipedia concerning maps to see if it would work before applying it to a project I'm working on that has a similar idea. What I would want is for a user to be able to enter sentences and then be able to distinguish how many times a the person entered a word in a... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: kcgb20
4 Replies

7. Programming

Array and Vector

Hi all, from my understanding I understand that I can use array in this manner. struct test { int a; int b; int c; }; test testing; //creating an array with the structer type testing.a=1; testing.b=2; testing.c=3; If I'm not wrong we can use array in this manner,... (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: vinzping
12 Replies

8. Programming

vector c++

hello guys. i'm new to c++. i've problem using two dimensional vector. i've a project of making conway's game of life. this is the code that i have made so far. my problem is how can i give a two dimensional vector through main. glider.vec1 = vec; is not correct way to give a two... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: nishrestha
2 Replies

9. Shell Programming and Scripting

Vector normalisation

In AWK For 3 individual vectors of the form: -2.772 -9.341 -2.857 -5.140 -6.597 -1.823 -2.730 -5.615 1.159 I would like to write a script that parses line by line to (i) normalise, (ii) divide by the norm for *each* vector. I.e. sqrt(-2.772^2 + -9.341^2 + -2.857^2)=10.154 ... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: chrisjorg
4 Replies

10. Programming

Number to bit vector

Is there a function to convert number (unsigned int for this example) to binary? I could not find a simple one thru google. While I was learning bloom filter with the example, I was wondering if anybody can help me to 1) display the real bits vector for the bloomfilter; 2) if dataset is very... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: yifangt
11 Replies
sort(3pm)						 Perl Programmers Reference Guide						 sort(3pm)

NAME
sort - perl pragma to control sort() behaviour SYNOPSIS
use sort 'stable'; # guarantee stability use sort '_quicksort'; # use a quicksort algorithm use sort '_mergesort'; # use a mergesort algorithm use sort 'defaults'; # revert to default behavior no sort 'stable'; # stability not important use sort '_qsort'; # alias for quicksort my $current; BEGIN { $current = sort::current(); # identify prevailing algorithm } DESCRIPTION
With the "sort" pragma you can control the behaviour of the builtin "sort()" function. In Perl versions 5.6 and earlier the quicksort algorithm was used to implement "sort()", but in Perl 5.8 a mergesort algorithm was also made available, mainly to guarantee worst case O(N log N) behaviour: the worst case of quicksort is O(N**2). In Perl 5.8 and later, quicksort defends against quadratic behaviour by shuffling large arrays before sorting. A stable sort means that for records that compare equal, the original input ordering is preserved. Mergesort is stable, quicksort is not. Stability will matter only if elements that compare equal can be distinguished in some other way. That means that simple numerical and lexical sorts do not profit from stability, since equal elements are indistinguishable. However, with a comparison such as { substr($a, 0, 3) cmp substr($b, 0, 3) } stability might matter because elements that compare equal on the first 3 characters may be distinguished based on subsequent characters. In Perl 5.8 and later, quicksort can be stabilized, but doing so will add overhead, so it should only be done if it matters. The best algorithm depends on many things. On average, mergesort does fewer comparisons than quicksort, so it may be better when complicated comparison routines are used. Mergesort also takes advantage of pre-existing order, so it would be favored for using "sort()" to merge several sorted arrays. On the other hand, quicksort is often faster for small arrays, and on arrays of a few distinct values, repeated many times. You can force the choice of algorithm with this pragma, but this feels heavy-handed, so the subpragmas beginning with a "_" may not persist beyond Perl 5.8. The default algorithm is mergesort, which will be stable even if you do not explicitly demand it. But the stability of the default sort is a side-effect that could change in later versions. If stability is important, be sure to say so with a use sort 'stable'; The "no sort" pragma doesn't forbid what follows, it just leaves the choice open. Thus, after no sort qw(_mergesort stable); a mergesort, which happens to be stable, will be employed anyway. Note that no sort "_quicksort"; no sort "_mergesort"; have exactly the same effect, leaving the choice of sort algorithm open. CAVEATS
As of Perl 5.10, this pragma is lexically scoped and takes effect at compile time. In earlier versions its effect was global and took effect at run-time; the documentation suggested using "eval()" to change the behaviour: { eval 'use sort qw(defaults _quicksort)'; # force quicksort eval 'no sort "stable"'; # stability not wanted print sort::current . " "; @a = sort @b; eval 'use sort "defaults"'; # clean up, for others } { eval 'use sort qw(defaults stable)'; # force stability print sort::current . " "; @c = sort @d; eval 'use sort "defaults"'; # clean up, for others } Such code no longer has the desired effect, for two reasons. Firstly, the use of "eval()" means that the sorting algorithm is not changed until runtime, by which time it's too late to have any effect. Secondly, "sort::current" is also called at run-time, when in fact the compile-time value of "sort::current" is the one that matters. So now this code would be written: { use sort qw(defaults _quicksort); # force quicksort no sort "stable"; # stability not wanted my $current; BEGIN { $current = print sort::current; } print "$current "; @a = sort @b; # Pragmas go out of scope at the end of the block } { use sort qw(defaults stable); # force stability my $current; BEGIN { $current = print sort::current; } print "$current "; @c = sort @d; } perl v5.16.2 2012-08-26 sort(3pm)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy