Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Hard link a directory
Top Forums UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Hard link a directory Post 302487890 by citaylor on Friday 14th of January 2011 03:27:52 AM
Old 01-14-2011
Historically its always been impossible. My linux still reports it as being impossible. Ive never witnessed it working.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Differences between hard link and soft link

Hi all! I'd like to know the differences between hard links and soft links. I've already read the ln manpage, but i'm not quite sure of what i understood. Does a hard link sort of copy the file to a new name, give it the same inode number and same rights? What exactly should I do to do this:... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: penguin-friend
3 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Why use a hard link

Someone asked me a question today about the difference between a hard link and a soft link. That got me thinking and maybe someone can answer. Why would I ever use a hard link if I can use a soft link instead? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: dangral
2 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Difference between hard link and soft link in unix

Hi All, Can any one please explain me what is the difference between hard link and soft link in UNIX. Thanks in advance Raja Chokalingam. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: RAJACHOKALINGAM
2 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

need some info about symbolic link and hard link

hello folks how y'all doin well i have some questions about symbolic link and hard link hope some one answer me i open terminal and join as root and i wrote ln -s blah blah then i wrote ls i see red file called blah blah but didn't understand what is this can some one explain and... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: detective linux
2 Replies

5. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Hard link

Hello, In unix, the normal user can't create a hardlink for a directory. why..? Is there any difference between creating a hard link for a file and directory? The super user can create a hard link for directories. Why we cannot create and super user can create.? Please, can anyone help... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: nagalenoj
1 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Hard Link vs SOft Link????

Hi PLease let me know the usage of Hard Link vs Soft Link i.e what is the basic difference and what happens when one file is changed or deleted in both the cases??? thanks (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: skyineyes
3 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Difference between hard link and soft link

Hi Experts, Please help me out to find out difference between a hard link and a soft link. I am new in unix plz help me with some example commands ( for creating such links). Regards S.Kamakshi :) (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: kamakshi s
2 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Find Hard Link

Goodmorning everybody. A question: How can i match if a file is an hard link or not? (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Guccio
6 Replies

9. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Hard Link Examples

Hello, Please move this if I chose the wrong forum category. This question pertains to Unix and Linux I believe. I google the difference between hard and symbolic/soft links and I understand the difference. What I am trying to find is a real example of a hard link being used in a Operating... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: jaysunn
11 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

Creating hard link with name

How can I create a hard link to a file, then rename the hard link to a different name? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: fhill2
2 Replies
LINK(2) 						     Linux Programmer's Manual							   LINK(2)

NAME
link - make a new name for a file SYNOPSIS
#include <unistd.h> int link(const char *oldpath, const char *newpath); DESCRIPTION
link() creates a new link (also known as a hard link) to an existing file. If newpath exists it will not be overwritten. This new name may be used exactly as the old one for any operation; both names refer to the same file (and so have the same permissions and ownership) and it is impossible to tell which name was the "original". RETURN VALUE
On success, zero is returned. On error, -1 is returned, and errno is set appropriately. ERRORS
EACCES Write access to the directory containing newpath is denied, or search permission is denied for one of the directories in the path prefix of oldpath or newpath. (See also path_resolution(7).) EEXIST newpath already exists. EFAULT oldpath or newpath points outside your accessible address space. EIO An I/O error occurred. ELOOP Too many symbolic links were encountered in resolving oldpath or newpath. EMLINK The file referred to by oldpath already has the maximum number of links to it. ENAMETOOLONG oldpath or newpath was too long. ENOENT A directory component in oldpath or newpath does not exist or is a dangling symbolic link. ENOMEM Insufficient kernel memory was available. ENOSPC The device containing the file has no room for the new directory entry. ENOTDIR A component used as a directory in oldpath or newpath is not, in fact, a directory. EPERM oldpath is a directory. EPERM The file system containing oldpath and newpath does not support the creation of hard links. EROFS The file is on a read-only file system. EXDEV oldpath and newpath are not on the same mounted file system. (Linux permits a file system to be mounted at multiple points, but link() does not work across different mount points, even if the same file system is mounted on both.) CONFORMING TO
SVr4, 4.3BSD, POSIX.1-2001 (but see NOTES). NOTES
Hard links, as created by link(), cannot span file systems. Use symlink(2) if this is required. POSIX.1-2001 says that link() should dereference oldpath if it is a symbolic link. However, since kernel 2.0, Linux does not do so: if oldpath is a symbolic link, then newpath is created as a (hard) link to the same symbolic link file (i.e., newpath becomes a symbolic link to the same file that oldpath refers to). Some other implementations behave in the same manner as Linux. POSIX.1-2008 changes the speci- fication of link(), making it implementation-dependent whether or not oldpath is dereferenced if it is a symbolic link. For precise con- trol over the treatment of symbolic links when creating a link, see linkat(2). BUGS
On NFS file systems, the return code may be wrong in case the NFS server performs the link creation and dies before it can say so. Use stat(2) to find out if the link got created. SEE ALSO
ln(1), linkat(2), open(2), rename(2), stat(2), symlink(2), unlink(2), path_resolution(7), symlink(7) COLOPHON
This page is part of release 3.25 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, and information about reporting bugs, can be found at http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/. Linux 2008-08-21 LINK(2)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:12 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy