Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: cobol compiler for suse
Top Forums Programming cobol compiler for suse Post 302484417 by rakeshkumar on Friday 31st of December 2010 02:08:48 AM
Old 12-31-2010
yes citaylor. why cobol compiler difficult to find for linux where as c,c++,java,py,perl...are easily available and comes with the native installation.
 

5 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

cobol crn programme run on express cobol as .gnt

can i run .crn programme in express cobol which support to .gnt programme .... Plz tell me solution (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: bibi
2 Replies

2. Programming

How Can a Machine Reads a Compiler Since A Compiler is Written in Text! Not Binaries?

To make a programming language you need a compiler, so what was the first programming language and how was is created if you need the compiler first? The compiler itself is considered as a high language comparing to the machine! since the compiler is not created in 1's and 0's... Eventhough i... (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: f.ben.isaac
12 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

Calling script from RM cobol and returning value to cobol

Is there a way you can return a value from a script that is called from a rm cobol program... 01 WS-COMD-LINE-PGM X(39) value sh ./getUserId.sh 12345" 01 WS-RETURN-SYS-CODE PIC 9(8). CALL "SYSTEM" USING WS-COMD-LINE-PGM GIVING WS-RETURN-SYS-CODE. ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: pavanmp
1 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

cobol help....compiler key and its usage....

i am having mfcobol old version... which was supplied by my friends....with a compiler key (h/w) having 24 pin male on one side and 24 pin female on the other side....with lable LOPOEK XXXXXXXXXX MICRO FOCUS........ AM USING NORMAL COMMANDS USING .CBL, .OBJ, .LIB FILES TO GET COBOL EXE FILE....... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: KANNI786
0 Replies

5. Red Hat

Install cobol compiler

Hi I dont have a cobol compiler in my redhhat linux box, and so I want to install it. When i try the below command sudo apt-get install open-cobol it tells "apt-get : command not found". I tried to find apt-get under my root, could not find it anywhere. Should we install apt-get also?... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: unx_freak
4 Replies
HF77(1) 							     LAM TOOLS								   HF77(1)

NAME
hf77, mpif77 - Compile LAM FORTRAN programs. SYNTAX
hf77 [-showme] ... see f77(1) (or whatever your underlying FORTRAN compiler is) for all other options. DESCRIPTION
hf77 is a convenience wrapper for the local native FORTRAN compiler. Translation of a LAM program requires the linkage of the LAM essen- tial services libraries which may not reside in one of the standard search directories of ld(1). hf77 passes its arguments along to the local native FORTRAN compiler along with the -L and -l options required by LAM/MPI programs. This includes all necessary options for ROMIO and/or C++ bindings support (if ROMIO/C++ support was included when LAM was compiled). mpif77 is now the same as hf77. See the NOTES section, below. By default, hf77 uses the FORTRAN compiler that was selected when LAM was configured (with the --with-fc flag to ./configure) as the local native FORTRAN compiler, but this can be overridden by the LAMHF77 environment variable. OPTIONS
-showme Does not invoke the underlying FORTRAN compiler. Instead, it shows the command line that would be executed to compile the FORTRAN program. NOTES
Previous versions of hf77 did not automatically link in the MPI library. Starting with LAM version 6.3, since hf77 has become the de facto LAM FORTRAN compiler, the -lmpi option is now automatically passed to the underlying compiler when linking LAM/MPI programs. Previous versions of LAM included the mpif77 wrapper script to automatically pass -lmpi to hf77. This script is now obsolete since hf77 now includes -lmpi automatically. mpif77 is now a symbolic link to hf77 to ensure backward compatibility. SEE ALSO
f77(1), ld(1), lam-helpfile(1) LAM 6.5.8 November, 2002 HF77(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:23 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy