Sponsored Content
Operating Systems Solaris ipfilter blocking ip fragments Post 302481462 by DGPickett on Friday 17th of December 2010 03:10:20 PM
Old 12-17-2010
Well, you cannot filter fragments unless you keep state, assuming the header fragment survives and arrives first. I guess if you wanted to be nice, you would store fragments for a while or until they are validated by a header fragment, and hold header fragments for a while, but state and storage makes the firewall vulnerable.

Can you make the UDP apps use smaller packets?

I always thought they messed up in http, making it tcp based, at least until http1.1 persistent connections with compression. I thought it might be nice to add a UDP flavored brother. A small graphic file GET would be one packet out, one back, no extra for SYN or FIN or ACK. DNS makes great use of UDP, one socket for an app that, for every packet in, sends one packet out, no fork, threads, poll, select, listen, accept or such.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

fragments in Solaris 8

When discussing inodes and data blocks, I know Solaris creates these data blocks with a total size of 8192b, divided into eight 1024b "fragments." It stores data in "contiguous" fragments and solaris doesn't allow a file to use portions of two different fragments. If the file size permits, then the... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: manderson19
4 Replies

2. HP-UX

ipfilter hpux11.11

how can I create a rule that will allow my machine to FTP to itself, but not allow other machines to FTP to it.. I know this sounds weird but this how they want it so they can test some application functionality that uses ftp. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: csaunders
2 Replies

3. Solaris

ipfilter solaris express

Hello, | am trying to setup ipfilter on solaris express snv_91 but I don't seem to have the following file available. /etc/ipf/pfil.ap Is this an older way of configuring the interface?, I have all the packages installed. Thanks, (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Actuator
1 Replies

4. Cybersecurity

questions about ipfilter

Dears, i am a new user for using ipfilter in solaris 10 and i have some question about this: by using ipfilter for example 1- i want specific MAC address able to access hotmail only 2- also i want to make 10MB for this MAC address is a max download per day 3- i am asking about using MAC... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: coxmanchester
0 Replies

5. Solaris

NAT IPFilter

Hi everybody, I'm running on Solaris 10 X86 (update 1009). I would like to make NAT's rule. I explain you. On Solaris, I configure the principal interface e1000g0 with IP : 192.168.0.33 I created the first logical interface like that : ifconfig e1000g0 addif 192.168.0.40 netmask... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: aureliensm
0 Replies

6. Solaris

Ipfilter question

Howdy My goal is to block locally the applications on a Solaris 10 server to access specific port on a remote machine. All attempts to access the <remote ip>:<remote port> should be rejected with ICMP port unreachable or with TCP RST. I tried with the following: block... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: ralome
2 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

Extract fragments from file

I have a .xml file that looks something like this : <measInfo> ......... string1 ......... </measInfo> <measInfo> ...... string2 ........ </measInfo> I want to extract only the 'chunk of file' from '<measInfo>' to '</measInfo>' containing string1 (or a certain string that I... (13 Replies)
Discussion started by: black_fender
13 Replies

8. Programming

Which are blocking and non-blocking api's in sockets in C ?

among the below socket programming api's, please let me know which are blocking and non-blocking. socket accept bind listen write read close (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: VSSajjan
2 Replies

9. Solaris

A little help with ipfilter on Omnios

I'm on OmniOS. I have set a linux zone(lx zone) wich use 10.2.0.0/24 network. The other network,connected to internet is 192.168.0.0/24 The network interface of 10.2.0.0/24 is bge1 The network interface of 192.168.0.0/24 is bge0 I know is more easy to use the same network but i prefer to... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Linusolaradm1
1 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

Why the results of these two code fragments are not the same?

Code 1: #!/bin/sh for arg1 in "$@" do counter=0 for arg2 in "$@" do if && then counter=$((counter+1)) continue fi (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: johnprogrammer
8 Replies
DIVERT(4)                                                  BSD Kernel Interfaces Manual                                                  DIVERT(4)

NAME
divert -- kernel packet diversion mechanism SYNOPSIS
#include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/socket.h> #include <netinet/in.h> int socket(PF_INET, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_DIVERT); To enable support for divert sockets, place the following lines in the kernel configuration file: options IPFIREWALL options IPDIVERT Alternatively, to load divert as a module at boot time, add the following lines into the loader.conf(5) file: ipfw_load="YES" ipdivert_load="YES" DESCRIPTION
Divert sockets are similar to raw IP sockets, except that they can be bound to a specific divert port via the bind(2) system call. The IP address in the bind is ignored; only the port number is significant. A divert socket bound to a divert port will receive all packets diverted to that port by some (here unspecified) kernel mechanism(s). Packets may also be written to a divert port, in which case they re- enter kernel IP packet processing. Divert sockets are normally used in conjunction with FreeBSD's packet filtering implementation and the ipfw(8) program. By reading from and writing to a divert socket, matching packets can be passed through an arbitrary ``filter'' as they travel through the host machine, special routing tricks can be done, etc. READING PACKETS
Packets are diverted either as they are ``incoming'' or ``outgoing.'' Incoming packets are diverted after reception on an IP interface, whereas outgoing packets are diverted before next hop forwarding. Diverted packets may be read unaltered via read(2), recv(2), or recvfrom(2). In the latter case, the address returned will have its port set to some tag supplied by the packet diverter, (usually the ipfw rule number) and the IP address set to the (first) address of the interface on which the packet was received (if the packet was incoming) or INADDR_ANY (if the packet was outgoing). The interface name (if defined for the packet) will be placed in the 8 bytes following the address, if it fits. WRITING PACKETS
Writing to a divert socket is similar to writing to a raw IP socket; the packet is injected ``as is'' into the normal kernel IP packet pro- cessing using sendto(2) and minimal error checking is done. Packets are distinguished as either incoming or outgoing. If sendto(2) is used with a destination IP address of INADDR_ANY, then the packet is treated as if it were outgoing, i.e., destined for a non-local address. Oth- erwise, the packet is assumed to be incoming and full packet routing is done. In the latter case, the IP address specified must match the address of some local interface, or an interface name must be found after the IP address. If an interface name is found, that interface will be used and the value of the IP address will be ignored (other than the fact that it is not INADDR_ANY). This is to indicate on which interface the packet ``arrived''. Normally, packets read as incoming should be written as incoming; similarly for outgoing packets. When reading and then writing back pack- ets, passing the same socket address supplied by recvfrom(2) unmodified to sendto(2) simplifies things (see below). The port part of the socket address passed to the sendto(2) contains a tag that should be meaningful to the diversion module. In the case of ipfw(8) the tag is interpreted as the rule number after which rule processing should restart. LOOP AVOIDANCE
Packets written into a divert socket (using sendto(2)) re-enter the packet filter at the rule number following the tag given in the port part of the socket address, which is usually already set at the rule number that caused the diversion (not the next rule if there are several at the same number). If the 'tag' is altered to indicate an alternative re-entry point, care should be taken to avoid loops, where the same packet is diverted more than once at the same rule. DETAILS
If a packet is diverted but no socket is bound to the port, or if IPDIVERT is not enabled or loaded in the kernel, the packet is dropped. Incoming packet fragments which get diverted are fully reassembled before delivery; the diversion of any one fragment causes the entire packet to get diverted. If different fragments divert to different ports, then which port ultimately gets chosen is unpredictable. Note that packets arriving on the divert socket by the ipfw(8) tee action are delivered as-is and packet fragments do not get reassembled in this case. Packets are received and sent unchanged, except that packets read as outgoing have invalid IP header checksums, and packets written as outgo- ing have their IP header checksums overwritten with the correct value. Packets written as incoming and having incorrect checksums will be dropped. Otherwise, all header fields are unchanged (and therefore in network order). Binding to port numbers less than 1024 requires super-user access, as does creating a socket of type SOCK_RAW. ERRORS
Writing to a divert socket can return these errors, along with the usual errors possible when writing raw packets: [EINVAL] The packet had an invalid header, or the IP options in the packet and the socket options set were incompatible. [EADDRNOTAVAIL] The destination address contained an IP address not equal to INADDR_ANY that was not associated with any interface. SEE ALSO
bind(2), recvfrom(2), sendto(2), socket(2), ipfw(4), ipfw(8) AUTHORS
Archie Cobbs <archie@FreeBSD.org>, Whistle Communications Corp. BUGS
This is an attempt to provide a clean way for user mode processes to implement various IP tricks like address translation, but it could be cleaner, and it is too dependent on ipfw(8). It is questionable whether incoming fragments should be reassembled before being diverted. For example, if only some fragments of a packet destined for another machine do not get routed through the local machine, the packet is lost. This should probably be a settable socket option in any case. BSD December 17, 2004 BSD
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:58 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy