Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: HW Raid poor io performance
Top Forums UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users HW Raid poor io performance Post 302461304 by Scrutinizer on Sunday 10th of October 2010 04:19:28 AM
Old 10-10-2010
Hai Roland. Is there a problem? What is your problem? It is normal that you get higher throughput with large block sizes. 44 MB/s sequential write performance with a 512 byte block size directly to a device (no write combining) seems pretty decent to me. Is it much larger than the write cache of the controller? What were you expecting?
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Samba on E3500 Poor Performance!!!

Hi you all, I have a BIG performance problem on an Sun E3500, the scenario is described below: I have several users (30) accessing via samba to the E3500 using an application built on Visual Foxpro from their Windows PC , the problem is that the first guy that logs in demands 30% of the E3500... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: alex blanco
2 Replies

2. Filesystems, Disks and Memory

Poor read performance on sun storedge a1000

Hello, i have a a1000 connected to an e6500. There's a raid 10 (12 disks) on the a1000. If i do a dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/1 bs=1024k count=1000 and then look at iostat it tells me there's a kw/s of 25000. But if i do a dd of=/dev/zero if=/mnt/1 bs=1024k count=1000 then i see only a... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: mbrenner
1 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

poor performance processing file with awk

Hello, I'm running a script on AIX to process lines in a file. I need to enclose the second column in quotation marks and write each line to a new file. I've come up with the following: #!/bin/ksh filename=$1 exec >> $filename.new cat $filename | while read LINE do echo $LINE | awk... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: scooter53080
2 Replies

4. Solaris

Poor Disk performance on ZFS

Hello, we have a machine with Solaris Express 11, 2 LSI 9211 8i SAS 2 controllers (multipath to disks), multiport backplane, 16 Seagate Cheetah 15K RPM disks. Each disk has a sequential performance of 220/230 MB/s and in fact if I do a dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rdsk/<diskID_1> bs=1024k... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: golemico
1 Replies

5. Solaris

Poor disk performance however no sign of failure

Hello guys, I have two servers performing the same disk operations. I believe one server is having a disk's impending failure however I have no hard evidence to prove it. This is a pair of Netra 210's with 2 drives in a hardware raid mirror (LSI raid controller). While performing intensive... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: s ladd
4 Replies

6. AIX

Poor Performance of server

Hi, I am new registered user here in this UNIX forums. I am a new system administrator for AIX 6.1. One of our servers performs poorly every time our application (FINACLE) runs many processes/instances. (see below for topas snapshot) I use NMON or Topas to monitor the server utilization. I... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: guzzelle
9 Replies

7. Solaris

Poor performance on an M3000

Hi We have an M3000 single physical processor and 8gb of memory running Solaris 10. This system runs two Oracle Databases one on Oracle 9i and One on Oracle 10g. As soon as the Oracle 10g database starts we see an immediate drop in system performance, for example opening an ssh session can... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: gregsih
6 Replies

8. AIX

ISCSI poor performance 1.5MB/s fresh install AIX7.1

Hi Everyone, I have been struggling for few days with iSCSI and thought I could get some help on the forum... fresh install of AIX7.1 TL4 on Power 710, The rootvg relies on 3 SAS disks in RAID 0, 32GB Memory The lpar Profile is using all of the managed system's resources. I have connected... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: frenchy59
11 Replies

9. Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions

Poor Windows 10 Performance of Parallels Desktop 15 on macOS Catalina

Just a quick note for macOS users. I just installed (and removed) Parallels Desktop 15 Edition on my MacPro (2013) with 64GB memory and 12-cores, which is running the latest version of macOS Catalina as of this post. The reason for this install was to test some RIGOL test gear software which... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
6 Replies
re(7)							 Miscellaneous Information Manual						     re(7)

NAME
re - SWXCR RAID interface SYNOPSIS
2100 Server Model A500MP DEC SWXCR controller xcrn at * vector xcintr device disk renn at xcrn drive nn DESCRIPTION
The re driver is for the SWXCR RAID Array controller. The following rules are used to determine the major and minor numbers that are associated with an re type disk. There are two major num- bers used to represent re disks. The major numbers are 11 for block devices and 44 for character (raw) devices. The minor number is used to represent both the unit number and partition. A disk partition refers to a designated portion of the physical disk. To accomplish this reference, the 20-bit minor number is divided into three parts. The lowest six bits of the minor number specify a disk partition. The partitions use a letter, a through h, for their name. The next three bits of the minor number specify the RE unit number for a unit attached to an SWXCR controller. The final 11 bits specify the controller number. The device special file names associated with re disks are based on conventions that are closely associated with the minor number assigned to the disk. The standard device names begin with re for block special files and rre for character (raw) special files. Following the re is the unit number and then a letter, a through h, that represents the partition. Throughout this reference page, the question mark (?) character represents the unit number in the name of the device special file. For example, re?b could represent re0b, re1b, and so on. The unit number can be calculated if the major and minor numbers of an re disk are provided. For example, suppose you have a device spe- cial file rre6a, with a major number of 44 and a minor number of 384. The partition is represented by the lower six bits of the number 384. These lower six bits of the number 384 are 0, which specifies the a partition. The next three bits of the minor number 384 specify the unit number, which is 6. The next eleven bits specify the controller number, which is zero. Putting these three pieces together reveals that the major/minor number pair 44/384 refers to the a partition of unit 6 attached to controller number 0. A disk can be accessed through either the block special file or the character special file. The block special file accesses the disk using the file system's normal buffering mechanism. Reads and writes to the block special file can specify any size. This capability avoids the need to limit data transfers to the size of physical disk records and to calculate offsets within disk records. The file system can break up large read and write requests into smaller fixed size transfers to the disk. The character special file provides a raw interface that allows for direct transmission between the disk and the user's read or write buf- fer. A single read or write to the raw interface results in exactly one I/O operation. Consequently, raw I/O may be considerably more efficient for large transfers. For systems with RE disks, the first software boot after the system is powered on may take longer than expected. This delay is normal and is caused by the software spinning up the RE disks. Disk Support The RE driver handles all disk drives that can be connected to the SWXCR controller. To determine which drives are supported for specific CPU types and hardware configurations, see the Installation and Configuration Guide for the StorageWorks RAID Array 200 Subsystem Family. SWXCR RAID Controllers are viewed in all cases as RE type disks. There are some notable differences that should be taken into considera- tion when configuring a RAID device: Currently only sector sizes of 512 bytes are supported. Logical Volume sizes are not fixed sizes as compared to other disk devices. The size of the Logical Volume is configurable based on needs. The dynamic nature of Logical Volume sizes is dealt with by defining RAID devices as DYNAMIC. Only partitions a, b, c, and g are defined. If necessary, the disklabel(8) command can be run to change and define partitions for RAID devices. Usually, the re?a partition is used for the root file system and the re?b partition as a paging area. The re?c partition can be used for disk-to-disk copying because it maps the entire disk. The starting location and length (in 512 byte sectors) of the disk partitions of each drive are shown in the following table. Partition sizes can be changed by using the disklabel(8) command. SWXCR (RAID) partitions for systems based on the Alpha AXP architecture disk start length re?a 0 131072 re?b 131072 262144 re?c 0 end of media re?d 0 0 re?e 0 0 re?f 0 0 re?g 393216 end of media re?h 0 0 FILES
/dev/re??? /dev/rre??? /etc/disktab RELATED INFORMATION
disklabel(8), MAKEDEV(8), uerf(8) delim off re(7)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy