Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Redhat Virtualization 2.2
Operating Systems Linux Red Hat Redhat Virtualization 2.2 Post 302454946 by cjcox on Monday 20th of September 2010 10:53:03 AM
Old 09-20-2010
Not sure. We use FC (for a million reasons).
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Virtualization and Cloud Computing

Hardware virtualization

Hello to all In my organization we want to pass to move the systems to an virtualized environment, nevertheless, considering the absence of resources, the idea is to acquire the versers and that the department (I) do the facilities, tests, etc. Wearing out the possible minimal cost in... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: aalvarez77
1 Replies

2. HP-UX

Virtualization Software

Hello peopel I am interesting in implement a virtualization system on HP-UX v3. I have some Integrity servers with this OS installed but I want to virtualize one of them because I have a problem that has no solution in HP-UX and I have to install RedHat for this reason. Then I don't know what... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Lekram
1 Replies

3. Virtualization and Cloud Computing

Virtualization problems

Hi everyone. Last week we have some hardware problems in our Unixware 7 server, and i decided to change this physical machine into a virtual machine. The scenario is: architecture=IA32 bus_types=PCI2.10,ISA,PnP1.0 hostname=tecsup2uw.tecsupaqp.edu hw_provider=Generic AT... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: danilosevilla
1 Replies

4. HP-UX

Virtualization options for HP-UX 11.31

Hello, I am looking for a virtualization option for HP-UX that will allow VMs to run completely independent of each other with full Operating System capabilities (not a guest OS with limited features/access), with their own IP addresses and dedicated resources that will not interfere with any... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: bstring
4 Replies

5. Solaris

solaris virtualization

Hi everyone, I have ten servers with solaris (diffrent versions). there is solaris 10, solaris 6 and solaris 8. some are SPARC and some are x86 I would like to move them to one server so they all will be virtual. Is it possible? how? (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: bregtux
4 Replies

6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Sort command results are different in Redhat 4 vs Redhat 5

Hi, I am having a text file with the following contents ########### File1 ########### some page1.txt text page.txt When I sort this file on Red Hat 5, then I get the following output ########### File1 ########### page1.txt page.txt some (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: sarbjit
3 Replies

7. Linux

Virtualization best practices

Hello admins and gurus I have a controversial topic: now we are investing in a new Linux OS that will hold our Sybase database. The server will virtualized on a VMware server hosted on SAN storage. Now the question is, when we install the database engine is it better - in terms of performance -... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: abohmeed
1 Replies

8. Virtualization and Cloud Computing

Virtualization on vmware

Got tired of messing around with real hardware old and others.. Decided to spend some $$ for a QUAD-core dual cpu laptop with 8 gig of ram and 1 TB disk space.. running VMware workstation 10 on windows 8.0 , with a pair of solx86 vcs 5.1 cluster and a pair of rhel 6.4 vcs 6.x cluster.. ... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: ppchu99
0 Replies

9. UNIX for Beginners Questions & Answers

Redhat Virtualization EN error : InitLogger main process terminated with status 1

My server has /var/log/messages with 'init: initLogger main process (608798) terminated with status 1' errors. I researched about the error and also followed the steps from stackexchange : 157059/error-init-ttys0-dev-ttys0-main-process-1612-terminated-with-status-1]linux - ERROR: init: ttyS0... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Paras Pandey
0 Replies

10. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Solaris Virtualization

Hello All, To start with, I am not an expert of solaris and VMs. Unfortunately, I can't find a direct or understandable (at least to me) answer to my question online. So please, excuse me if my question will sound dumb to you. :o We have 2 remaining solaris 8 servers are on sparc... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: forextrafun
9 Replies
pthread_mutex_timedlock(3C)				   Standard C Library Functions 			       pthread_mutex_timedlock(3C)

NAME
pthread_mutex_timedlock, pthread_mutex_reltimedlock_np - lock a mutex SYNOPSIS
cc -mt [ flag... ] file... [ library... ] #include <pthread.h> #include <time.h> int pthread_mutex_timedlock(pthread_mutex_t *restrict mutex, const struct timespec *restrict abs_timeout); int pthread_mutex_reltimedlock_np(pthread_mutex_t *restrict mutex, const struct timespec *restrict rel_timeout); DESCRIPTION
The pthread_mutex_timedlock() function locks the mutex object referenced by mutex. If the mutex is already locked, the calling thread blocks until the mutex becomes available as in the pthread_mutex_lock(3C). If the mutex cannot be locked without waiting for another thread to unlock the mutex, this wait is terminated when the specified timeout expires. The pthread_mutex_reltimedlock_np() function is identical to the pthread_mutex_timedlock() function, except that the timeout is specified as a relative time interval. For pthread_mutex_timedlock(), the timeout expires when the absolute time specified by abs_timeout passes, as measured by the clock on which timeouts are based (that is, when the value of that clock equals or exceeds abs_timeout), or if the absolute time specified by abs_timeout has already been passed at the time of the call. For pthread_mutex_reltimedlock_np(), the timeout expires when the time interval specified by rel_timeout passes, as measured by the CLOCK_REALTIME clock, or if the time interval specified by rel_timeout is negative at the time of the call. The resolution of the timeout is the resolution of the CLOCK_REALTIME clock. The timespec data type is defined in the <time.h>header. Under no circumstance will either function fail with a timeout if the mutex can be locked immediately. The validity of the timeout parame- ter is not checked if the mutex can be locked immediately. As a consequence of the priority inheritance rules (for mutexes initialized with the PRIO_INHERIT protocol), if a timed mutex wait is ter- minated because its timeout expires, the priority of the owner of the mutex is adjusted as necessary to reflect the fact that this thread is no longer among the threads waiting for the mutex. RETURN VALUES
Upon successful completion, the pthread_mutex_timedlock() and pthread_mutex_reltimedlock_np() functions return 0. Otherwise, an error num- ber is returned to indicate the error. ERRORS
The pthread_mutex_timedlock() and pthread_mutex_reltimedlock_np() functions will fail for the same reasons as pthread_mutex_lock(3C). In addition, they will fail if: EINVAL The caller would have blocked and the timeout parameter specified a nanoseconds field value less than zero or greater than or equal to 1,000 million. ETIMEDOUT The mutex could not be locked before the specified timeout expired. ATTRIBUTES
See attributes(5) for descriptions of the following attributes: +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ | ATTRIBUTE TYPE | ATTRIBUTE VALUE | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ |Interface Stability |See below. | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ |MT-Level |MT-Safe | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------+ The pthread_mutex_timedlock() is Standard. The pthread_mutex_reltimedlock_np() function is Stable. SEE ALSO
time(2), pthread_mutex_destroy(3C), pthread_mutex_lock(3C), pthread_mutex_trylock(3C), attributes(5), standards(5) SunOS 5.11 5 Jun 2007 pthread_mutex_timedlock(3C)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:57 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy