Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Updating the FreeBSD ports
Operating Systems BSD Updating the FreeBSD ports Post 302450959 by figaro on Sunday 5th of September 2010 04:06:26 AM
Old 09-05-2010
I had found out that portsnap is indeed quite a bit faster than cvsup. Thanks for the update.
 

8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

FreeBSD ports

working with FreeBSD 4.5 learning the hang of it i must say but still few probs i want to install some packages from my freebsd cdrom read lot of docs but still don't understand the commands first tried to install it by copying the tgz file and the let tar xzf on it. It worked fine and had... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: termiEEE
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

FreeBSD 5.00 /ports

Download FreeBSD 5.0 mini_install.ISO i was trying to do a post-installation , trying to install the ports but doesn't install it gives me could not find index error ?!any ideas..?? as the index file is on the cd and I checked it the file is not corrupt.!! A guy made me an offer i can't... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: wizardofid
9 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

awk updating one file with another, comparing, updating

Hello, I read and search through this wonderful forum and tried different approaches but it seems I lack some knowledge and neurones ^^ Here is what I'm trying to achieve : file1: test filea 3495; test fileb 4578; test filec 7689; test filey 9978; test filez 12300; file2: test filea... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: mecano
11 Replies

4. UNIX and Linux Applications

[FreeBSD] / ports / textproc / htmlise - how to

/ ports / textproc / htmlisehttp://cvsweb.freebsd.org/ports/textproc/htmlise I've installed this but I can't find any documentation -anywhere- on how to use it. There is no man or help switch available for this. Can anybody give me some insight on what syntax it requires or a simple example on... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: phpfreak
3 Replies

5. Programming

Application crashes in FreeBSD 7.1 while working ok in FreeBSD 6.3

Hello there, My mulithreaded application (which is too large to represent the source code here) is crashing after installing FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE/amd64. It worked properly on others machines (Dual Cores with 4GB of RAM - FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE/i386). The current machine has 2x Core 2 Duo... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Seenquev
1 Replies

6. BSD

Installing ports upon FreeBSD install

I use DesktopBSD (FreeBSD + KDE) and regularly install this on our machines. Currently I go to the package manager to install the ports, but what shell command can I enter instead right after BSD install to install the ports? Thanks in advance (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: figaro
3 Replies

7. Shell Programming and Scripting

updating LD_LIBRARY_PATH

Inside my csh script, I have the following command: source ${HOME}/.login When I execute my csh script, why do I get the following error message: /cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/system32/export: Permission denied This is what I have inside my .login #!/bin/bash export... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: casau
9 Replies

8. Ubuntu

16.04 not updating

Just installed the latest version on my hp stream, was tired of windows. Of the few times I've used Linux, this is the first time it won't update. Im connected to the net the updater recognizes that the OS needs 21 updates. But it won't download/install the updates. It also won't load the... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: DabblingMadman
1 Replies
pnmscalefixed(1)					      General Commands Manual						  pnmscalefixed(1)

NAME
pnmscalefixed - scale a portable anymap quickly, but less accurate DESCRIPTION
pnmscalefixed is the same thing as pnmscale except that it uses fixed point arithmetic internally instead of floating point, which makes it run faster. In turn, it is less accurate and may distort the image. Use the pnmscale man page with pnmscalefixed. This man page only describes the difference. pnmscalefixed uses fixed point 12 bit arithmetic. By contrast, pnmscale uses floating point arithmetic which on most machines is probably 24 bit precision. This makes pnmscalefixed run faster (30% faster in one experiment), but the imprecision can cause distortions at the right and bottom edges. The distortion takes the following form: One pixel from the edge of the input is rendered larger in the output than the scaling factor requires. Consequently, the rest of the image is smaller than the scaling factor requires, because the overall dimensions of the image are always as requested. This distortion will usually be very hard to see. pnmscalefixed with the -verbose option tells you how much distortion there is. The amount of distortion depends on the size of the input image and how close the scaling factor is to an integral 1/4096th. If the scaling factor is an exact multiple of 1/4096, there is no distortion. So, for example doubling or halving an image causes no dis- tortion. But reducing it or enlarging it by a third would cause some distortion. To consider an extreme case, scaling a 100,000 row image down to 50,022 rows would create an output image with all of the input squeezed into the top 50,000 rows, and the last row of the input copied into the bottom 22 rows of output. pnmscalefixed could probably be modified to use 16 bit or better arithmetic without losing anything. The modification would consist of a single constant in the source code. Until there is a demonstrated need for that, though, the Netpbm maintainer wants to keep the safety cushion afforded by the original 12 bit precision. pnmscalefixed does not have pnmscale 's -nomix option. 18 November 2000 pnmscalefixed(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:42 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy