Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: Signals and semaphores
Top Forums Programming Signals and semaphores Post 302450696 by Corona688 on Friday 3rd of September 2010 01:05:02 PM
Old 09-03-2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by _thomas
Thank you for your reply. I think I have found quicker and safer solution for problem.

I've removed all my code from signal handler and added variable increment.

Code:
void timer_handler(int signum)
{
    tick++;    
}

This isn't threadsafe. Variables aren't atomic and/or threadsafe on their own, that's why we need things like mutexes and semaphores.

All your solution amounts to is exactly what I suggested anyway: doing sem_post in the interrupt handler(increment the semaphore), and sem_wait inside the thread(decrement the semaphore). Treat the semaphore like a thread-safe integer that blocks the thing trying to decrement it if it goes below zero. You don't have to post and wait in both, it's not a mutex.
Quote:
I'm using SA_RESTART flag so if sem_wait() or sem_post() are interrupted by signal, they will be restarted. Now I have semaphores inside infinite loop inside main program and in threads. I don't think I should experience similar problem again.

What do you think?
You didn't expect them to fail before, either. You can't account for everything. Always check the return value of an important system call, it's not optional!

Last edited by Corona688; 09-03-2010 at 02:12 PM..
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

Semaphores

Dear Reader, I'm in a multiprocess environment working with shared mem and semaphores as mutex.. The problem is -- If one of the process hooked up with the semaphore and accessing the shared mem, terminates abruptly ( or got killed ), other process which are in want of the semaphore are... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: joseph_shibu
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Semaphores

Hi all, I am using HP 10.20 on A 9000/785. My question is: If I am the only person logged in as root at the moment, how many "semaphore proccesses" should I have?? Is it only one, or it is relevant to other system proccesses? Here is what I get listing the current semaphores # ipcs -sp... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: guest100
1 Replies

3. Programming

semaphores

Hi there, Could someone please confirm which POSIX semaphore routines should be used for a multiprocess (and not multithreaded) environment? sys/sem.h definitely works. but the routines, semget, semctl, semop are pretty unwieldy. So, I am looking for an easier way out. From the man pages... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: qntmteleporter
2 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

semaphores

Hi Friends, If i execute this command it comes back with 300 lines: ipcs|grep cerebrus >>> i would like to clear the semaphores but ipcrm can remove one id at a time. is there a quicker way of removing semaphores maybe using awk? Regards, (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: kekanap
1 Replies

5. Programming

semaphores using up and down

been searching around on how to use an up and down function with semaphores but i can't find an example. i looked into using: "semop" but i have no idea how to use it. I have been able to declared the semaphores using semget and initializing them using semctl. (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: ddx08
7 Replies

6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

How many semaphores?

Hello, first of all I apologize if this thread is not in the correct section of this forum, but this one just seemed the most appropriate. The question I have does not concern Unix specifically, it applies to virtually any OS, however it is in Unix where I learned about this problem. So, the... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: Watto86
8 Replies

7. Programming

Problem with semaphores

Hello, I was doing an exercise of semaphores and shared memory, namely the barbers: -B number of barbers -S number of chairs -C number of customers. I have done already and I compiled the code, but when run I get an error segment. Can not be and it took several days. If anyone sees the error... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: ciudadwifi
2 Replies

8. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

semaphores

I am having problem with semaphores. I am trying to protect line where process prints so that every process with print in proper order.This is the code.. #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/ipc.h> #include <sys/sem.h> #include <sys/types.h> union... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: joker40
3 Replies

9. Programming

about Semaphores

Hello Everybody, I am building a server. this server contains some data. Clients may modify this data or read this data. If a client is reading the data and at the same time another client is modifying the data then at this case the reading client may read some false data (some old mixed with... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Omar_Mokhtar
1 Replies

10. Solaris

Semaphores

Hi, Can somebody please explain me what semaphores are? there purpose? and there effects? Thanks in advance:) (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Laxxi
0 Replies
SEMAPHORES(3)						     Library Functions Manual						     SEMAPHORES(3)

NAME
sem_init, sem_wait, sem_trywait, sem_post, sem_getvalue, sem_destroy - operations on semaphores SYNOPSIS
#include <semaphore.h> int sem_init(sem_t *sem, int pshared, unsigned int value); int sem_wait(sem_t * sem); int sem_trywait(sem_t * sem); int sem_post(sem_t * sem); int sem_getvalue(sem_t * sem, int * sval); int sem_destroy(sem_t * sem); DESCRIPTION
This manual page documents POSIX 1003.1b semaphores, not to be confused with SystemV semaphores as described in ipc(5), semctl(2) and semop(2). Semaphores are counters for resources shared between threads. The basic operations on semaphores are: increment the counter atomically, and wait until the counter is non-null and decrement it atomically. sem_init initializes the semaphore object pointed to by sem. The count associated with the semaphore is set initially to value. The pshared argument indicates whether the semaphore is local to the current process ( pshared is zero) or is to be shared between several pro- cesses ( pshared is not zero). LinuxThreads currently does not support process-shared semaphores, thus sem_init always returns with error ENOSYS if pshared is not zero. sem_wait suspends the calling thread until the semaphore pointed to by sem has non-zero count. It then atomically decreases the semaphore count. sem_trywait is a non-blocking variant of sem_wait. If the semaphore pointed to by sem has non-zero count, the count is atomically decreased and sem_trywait immediately returns 0. If the semaphore count is zero, sem_trywait immediately returns with error EAGAIN. sem_post atomically increases the count of the semaphore pointed to by sem. This function never blocks and can safely be used in asynchro- nous signal handlers. sem_getvalue stores in the location pointed to by sval the current count of the semaphore sem. sem_destroy destroys a semaphore object, freeing the resources it might hold. No threads should be waiting on the semaphore at the time sem_destroy is called. In the LinuxThreads implementation, no resources are associated with semaphore objects, thus sem_destroy actually does nothing except checking that no thread is waiting on the semaphore. CANCELLATION
sem_wait is a cancellation point. ASYNC-SIGNAL SAFETY On processors supporting atomic compare-and-swap (Intel 486, Pentium and later, Alpha, PowerPC, MIPS II, Motorola 68k), the sem_post func- tion is async-signal safe and can therefore be called from signal handlers. This is the only thread synchronization function provided by POSIX threads that is async-signal safe. On the Intel 386 and the Sparc, the current LinuxThreads implementation of sem_post is not async-signal safe by lack of the required atomic operations. RETURN VALUE
The sem_wait and sem_getvalue functions always return 0. All other semaphore functions return 0 on success and -1 on error, in addition to writing an error code in errno. ERRORS
The sem_init function sets errno to the following codes on error: EINVAL value exceeds the maximal counter value SEM_VALUE_MAX ENOSYS pshared is not zero The sem_trywait function sets errno to the following error code on error: EAGAIN the semaphore count is currently 0 The sem_post function sets errno to the following error code on error: ERANGE after incrementation, the semaphore value would exceed SEM_VALUE_MAX (the semaphore count is left unchanged in this case) The sem_destroy function sets errno to the following error code on error: EBUSY some threads are currently blocked waiting on the semaphore. AUTHOR
Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr> SEE ALSO
pthread_mutex_init(3), pthread_cond_init(3), pthread_cancel(3), ipc(5). LinuxThreads SEMAPHORES(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:52 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy