Sponsored Content
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers profiling execution of a process Post 302449193 by rakesh1988 on Sunday 29th of August 2010 03:41:50 AM
Old 08-29-2010
Question profiling execution of a process

question goes like this :

Explain how users can profile execution of a process with help of an example?

can some one pls give me the answer??
 

8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Profiling..entry for a function in pthread_create

Hello, i am try to write a profiler for a multithreaded applciation. When i creat e a thread for "function f2()" the profiling information for this function does not get captured in the struct profileManager. i;e i get the exit information for "function f2()" in that thread, but the entry... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Vikky Panchal
2 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

perl - understand process status and continue the code execution

Hello, I need advice on how to check if started processes are finished in perl, here's explanation : OS is RHEL 4, perl -v = "This is perl, v5.8.0 built for i386-linux-thread-multi" The logic of the script : #!/usr/bin/perl use warnings; $param1 = $ARGV; $param2 = $ARGV; $param3 =... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: sysgate
2 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Kernel Profiling

I compiled my device driver with the profiling option -p but while linking I am getting undefined reference to _mcount. LD /vobs/femto_drivers/DspBiosLink/dsplinkk/src/dsplinkk.o Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST *** Warning: "_mcount" undefined! Architechture: ppc32 From... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Ashok V
0 Replies

4. Solaris

Process execution time in milliseconds

Hey everyone, I'm coming from Linux where the top command gave me lots of process info (particularly CPU time in milliseconds) and I'm trying to find similar info in Solaris. So far I've looked at prstat and ps but neither give cpu time in milliseconds, both seem to have 1 second... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: maniac_ie
2 Replies

5. Shell Programming and Scripting

how to continue shell script execution process without control going to pompt?

Hi Friends, Iam invoking another shell script to create B2k_session_id from my shell script.It is properly creating B2k_session_id and after creation control is coming out from the script and going to command prompt.The lines which are after the exectrusteduser.com sh.com are not executing..may... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: vadlamudy
5 Replies

6. Programming

Profiling results and SMP

The SCO OSR 5.7 system was migrated from older HP DL360 to new DL380 G7. The SMP feature was not activated on older box, it is activated now on this 4 core Xeon. A s/w we maintain has been copied without any change over to the new box. I noticed that the application profiling does not show any... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: migurus
4 Replies

7. AIX

C profiling tool for AIX

Hello everybody, Please let me know if there are any free C profiling tool for AIX environment Thanks in advance (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: SteAlma
0 Replies

8. Debian

Profiling Processes while shutdown

I was wondering how can I find the culprit of a slow shutdown on my debian box? I am actually looking for a diagnosis tool that might dump the process name and amount of time it took to close the process after signal was send. As for now I am trying to use journalctl to seek some information,... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: Varun Pandey
5 Replies
RPNTUTORIAL(1)							      rrdtool							    RPNTUTORIAL(1)

NAME
rpntutorial - Reading RRDtool RPN Expressions by Steve Rader DESCRIPTION
This tutorial should help you get to grips with RRDtool RPN expressions as seen in CDEF arguments of RRDtool graph. Reading Comparison Operators The LT, LE, GT, GE and EQ RPN logic operators are not as tricky as they appear. These operators act on the two values on the stack preceding them (to the left). Read these two values on the stack from left to right inserting the operator in the middle. If the resulting statement is true, then replace the three values from the stack with "1". If the statement if false, replace the three values with "0". For example, think about "2,1,GT". This RPN expression could be read as "is two greater than one?" The answer to that question is "true". So the three values should be replaced with "1". Thus the RPN expression 2,1,GT evaluates to 1. Now consider "2,1,LE". This RPN expression could be read as "is two less than or equal to one?". The natural response is "no" and thus the RPN expression 2,1,LE evaluates to 0. Reading the IF Operator The IF RPN logic operator can be straightforward also. The key to reading IF operators is to understand that the condition part of the traditional "if X than Y else Z" notation has *already* been evaluated. So the IF operator acts on only one value on the stack: the third value to the left of the IF value. The second value to the left of the IF corresponds to the true ("Y") branch. And the first value to the left of the IF corresponds to the false ("Z") branch. Read the RPN expression "X,Y,Z,IF" from left to right like so: "if X then Y else Z". For example, consider "1,10,100,IF". It looks bizarre to me. But when I read "if 1 then 10 else 100" it's crystal clear: 1 is true so the answer is 10. Note that only zero is false; all other values are true. "2,20,200,IF" ("if 2 then 20 else 200") evaluates to 20. And "0,1,2,IF" ("if 0 then 1 else 2) evaluates to 2. Notice that none of the above examples really simulate the whole "if X then Y else Z" statement. This is because computer programmers read this statement as "if Some Condition then Y else Z". So it's important to be able to read IF operators along with the LT, LE, GT, GE and EQ operators. Some Examples While compound expressions can look overly complex, they can be considered elegantly simple. To quickly comprehend RPN expressions, you must know the algorithm for evaluating RPN expressions: iterate searches from the left to the right looking for an operator. When it's found, apply that operator by popping the operator and some number of values (and by definition, not operators) off the stack. For example, the stack "1,2,3,+,+" gets "2,3,+" evaluated (as "2+3") during the first iteration and is replaced by 5. This results in the stack "1,5,+". Finally, "1,5,+" is evaluated resulting in the answer 6. For convenience, it's useful to write this set of operations as: 1) 1,2,3,+,+ eval is 2,3,+ = 5 result is 1,5,+ 2) 1,5,+ eval is 1,5,+ = 6 result is 6 3) 6 Let's use that notation to conveniently solve some complex RPN expressions with multiple logic operators: 1) 20,10,GT,10,20,IF eval is 20,10,GT = 1 result is 1,10,20,IF read the eval as pop "20 is greater than 10" so push 1 2) 1,10,20,IF eval is 1,10,20,IF = 10 result is 10 read pop "if 1 then 10 else 20" so push 10. Only 10 is left so 10 is the answer. Let's read a complex RPN expression that also has the traditional multiplication operator: 1) 128,8,*,7000,GT,7000,128,8,*,IF eval 128,8,* result is 1024 2) 1024 ,7000,GT,7000,128,8,*,IF eval 1024,7000,GT result is 0 3) 0, 7000,128,8,*,IF eval 128,8,* result is 1024 4) 0, 7000,1024, IF result is 1024 Now let's go back to the first example of multiple logic operators, but replace the value 20 with the variable "input": 1) input,10,GT,10,input,IF eval is input,10,GT ( lets call this A ) Read eval as "if input > 10 then true" and replace "input,10,GT" with "A": 2) A,10,input,IF eval is A,10,input,IF read "if A then 10 else input". Now replace A with it's verbose description again and--voila!--you have an easily readable description of the expression: if input > 10 then 10 else input Finally, let's go back to the first most complex example and replace the value 128 with "input": 1) input,8,*,7000,GT,7000,input,8,*,IF eval input,8,* result is A where A is "input * 8" 2) A,7000,GT,7000,input,8,*,IF eval is A,7000,GT result is B where B is "if ((input * 8) > 7000) then true" 3) B,7000,input,8,*,IF eval is input,8,* result is C where C is "input * 8" 4) B,7000,C,IF At last we have a readable decoding of the complex RPN expression with a variable: if ((input * 8) > 7000) then 7000 else (input * 8) Exercises Exercise 1: Compute "3,2,*,1,+ and "3,2,1,+,*" by hand. Rewrite them in traditional notation. Explain why they have different answers. Answer 1: 3*2+1 = 7 and 3*(2+1) = 9. These expressions have different answers because the altering of the plus and times operators alter the order of their evaluation. Exercise 2: One may be tempted to shorten the expression input,8,*,56000,GT,56000,input,*,8,IF by removing the redundant use of "input,8,*" like so: input,56000,GT,56000,input,IF,8,* Use traditional notation to show these expressions are not the same. Write an expression that's equivalent to the first expression, but uses the LE and DIV operators. Answer 2: if (input <= 56000/8 ) { input*8 } else { 56000 } input,56000,8,DIV,LT,input,8,*,56000,IF Exercise 3: Briefly explain why traditional mathematic notation requires the use of parentheses. Explain why RPN notation does not require the use of parentheses. Answer 3: Traditional mathematic expressions are evaluated by doing multiplication and division first, then addition and subtraction. Parentheses are used to force the evaluation of addition before multiplication (etc). RPN does not require parentheses because the ordering of objects on the stack can force the evaluation of addition before multiplication. Exercise 4: Explain why it was desirable for the RRDtool developers to implement RPN notation instead of traditional mathematical notation. Answer 4: The algorithm that implements traditional mathematical notation is more complex then algorithm used for RPN. So implementing RPN allowed Tobias Oetiker to write less code! (The code is also less complex and therefore less likely to have bugs.) AUTHOR
Steve Rader <rader@wiscnet.net> 1.4.7 2009-12-08 RPNTUTORIAL(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:03 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy