Sponsored Content
Top Forums Programming pthread_mutex_lock in ANSI C vs using Atomic builtins of GCC Post 302448356 by fpmurphy on Wednesday 25th of August 2010 11:08:45 PM
Old 08-26-2010
I assume that this is a typo - the second pthread_mutex_lock() should be a pthread_mutex_unlock().
Code:
     pthread_mutex_lock( &_L_LOCK );
         Shared_VariableA.uint16 = in;
     pthread_mutex_lock( &_L_LOCK );

This User Gave Thanks to fpmurphy For This Post:
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

Convert file from Unix - ANSI to PC - ANSI

Hi, I am creating a file in Unix using a shell script. The file is getting created in the Unix - ANSI format. My requirement is to convert it to the PC - ANSI format. Can anyone tell me how to do this? Thanks, Sunil (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: ssmallya
0 Replies

2. Programming

pthread_rwlock_lock vs pthread_mutex_lock

I have been wondering what the difference between pthread_rwlock_lock and pthread_mutex_lock is. Both these routines acquire an exclusive rw lock on an enclosed region. So I performed a simple experiment in which I execute both these routines multiple times in a loop. Here are the results:... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: kmehta
1 Replies

3. Programming

Interesting issue with pthread_mutex_lock and siglongjmp in AIX 5.3 (and no other OS)

Executive summary: Code (posted below) cores in AIX 5.3, despite being compiled and run successfully on several other operating systems. Code is attempting to verify that pthread_mutex_lock can be successfully aborted by siglongjmp. I do not believe this is an unreasonable requirement. If... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: DreamWarrior
1 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

program name and function name builtins

Hi Is there a way to get the program/script name or function name usng built ins. Like in many languages arg holds the program name regards (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: xiamin
2 Replies

5. Programming

why the implementatoin of Bakery algorithm in ANSI C does not work in ANSI C

I follow the description of wiki (Lamport's bakery algorithm - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia), then implement that algorithm in C, but it doesn't work, Starving is still here, is the implementation worry? Only print out: Thread ID: 0 START! Thread ID: 0 END! Thread ID: 0 START!... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: sehang
2 Replies

6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Writing Custom Builtins for KSH93

I am looking to create some ksh93 extensions using the custom builtin feature. I can successfully create a builtin function, load it using the builtin -f command and get an output. However, I want to get/set values of KSH variables from within my built-in. For example, lets say I am creating... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: a_programmer
2 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Why does /bin contain binaries for builtins?

Why do shell builtins like echo and pwd have binaries in /bin? When I do which pwd, I get the one in /bin. that means that I am not using the builtin version? What determines which one gets used? Is the which command a definitive way to determine what is being run when I enter pwd? (16 Replies)
Discussion started by: glev2005
16 Replies

8. Programming

Using ANSI color codes in gcc compiled program

I have put some yellow color codes and works well. I call the funstion using print_usage(stderr, 0); I would like to know if there is any way, to store the ansi color codes in variables and then call them inside fprintf. Or have a format followed by the strings I want to output. ... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: kristinu
5 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Shell and bash builtins...

Not sure if this is the right forum but I have collated a listing of shell and bash builtins. Builtins is a loose word and may include the '/bin' drawer/folder/directory but NOT any others in the path list. In the case of my Macbook Pro, OSX 10.7.5 the enabled internals is also listed... ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: wisecracker
1 Replies
PTHREAD_MUTEX(3)					     Library Functions Manual						  PTHREAD_MUTEX(3)

NAME
pthread_mutex_init, pthread_mutex_lock, pthread_mutex_trylock, pthread_mutex_unlock, pthread_mutex_destroy - operations on mutexes SYNOPSIS
#include <pthread.h> pthread_mutex_t fastmutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; pthread_mutex_t recmutex = PTHREAD_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP; pthread_mutex_t errchkmutex = PTHREAD_ERRORCHECK_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP; int pthread_mutex_init(pthread_mutex_t *mutex, const pthread_mutexattr_t *mutexattr); int pthread_mutex_lock(pthread_mutex_t *mutex); int pthread_mutex_trylock(pthread_mutex_t *mutex); int pthread_mutex_unlock(pthread_mutex_t *mutex); int pthread_mutex_destroy(pthread_mutex_t *mutex); DESCRIPTION
A mutex is a MUTual EXclusion device, and is useful for protecting shared data structures from concurrent modifications, and implementing critical sections and monitors. A mutex has two possible states: unlocked (not owned by any thread), and locked (owned by one thread). A mutex can never be owned by two different threads simultaneously. A thread attempting to lock a mutex that is already locked by another thread is suspended until the own- ing thread unlocks the mutex first. pthread_mutex_init initializes the mutex object pointed to by mutex according to the mutex attributes specified in mutexattr. If mutexattr is NULL, default attributes are used instead. The LinuxThreads implementation supports only one mutex attributes, the mutex kind, which is either ``fast'', ``recursive'', or ``error checking''. The kind of a mutex determines whether it can be locked again by a thread that already owns it. The default kind is ``fast''. See pthread_mutexattr_init(3) for more information on mutex attributes. Variables of type pthread_mutex_t can also be initialized statically, using the constants PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER (for fast mutexes), PTHREAD_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP (for recursive mutexes), and PTHREAD_ERRORCHECK_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP (for error checking mutexes). pthread_mutex_lock locks the given mutex. If the mutex is currently unlocked, it becomes locked and owned by the calling thread, and pthread_mutex_lock returns immediately. If the mutex is already locked by another thread, pthread_mutex_lock suspends the calling thread until the mutex is unlocked. If the mutex is already locked by the calling thread, the behavior of pthread_mutex_lock depends on the kind of the mutex. If the mutex is of the ``fast'' kind, the calling thread is suspended until the mutex is unlocked, thus effectively causing the calling thread to deadlock. If the mutex is of the ``error checking'' kind, pthread_mutex_lock returns immediately with the error code EDEADLK. If the mutex is of the ``recursive'' kind, pthread_mutex_lock succeeds and returns immediately, recording the number of times the calling thread has locked the mutex. An equal number of pthread_mutex_unlock operations must be performed before the mutex returns to the unlocked state. pthread_mutex_trylock behaves identically to pthread_mutex_lock, except that it does not block the calling thread if the mutex is already locked by another thread (or by the calling thread in the case of a ``fast'' mutex). Instead, pthread_mutex_trylock returns immediately with the error code EBUSY. pthread_mutex_unlock unlocks the given mutex. The mutex is assumed to be locked and owned by the calling thread on entrance to pthread_mutex_unlock. If the mutex is of the ``fast'' kind, pthread_mutex_unlock always returns it to the unlocked state. If it is of the ``recursive'' kind, it decrements the locking count of the mutex (number of pthread_mutex_lock operations performed on it by the calling thread), and only when this count reaches zero is the mutex actually unlocked. On ``error checking'' mutexes, pthread_mutex_unlock actually checks at run-time that the mutex is locked on entrance, and that it was locked by the same thread that is now calling pthread_mutex_unlock. If these conditions are not met, an error code is returned and the mutex remains unchanged. ``Fast'' and ``recursive'' mutexes perform no such checks, thus allowing a locked mutex to be unlocked by a thread other than its owner. This is non-portable behavior and must not be relied upon. pthread_mutex_destroy destroys a mutex object, freeing the resources it might hold. The mutex must be unlocked on entrance. In the Linux- Threads implementation, no resources are associated with mutex objects, thus pthread_mutex_destroy actually does nothing except checking that the mutex is unlocked. CANCELLATION
None of the mutex functions is a cancellation point, not even pthread_mutex_lock, in spite of the fact that it can suspend a thread for arbitrary durations. This way, the status of mutexes at cancellation points is predictable, allowing cancellation handlers to unlock pre- cisely those mutexes that need to be unlocked before the thread stops executing. Consequently, threads using deferred cancellation should never hold a mutex for extended periods of time. ASYNC-SIGNAL SAFETY The mutex functions are not async-signal safe. What this means is that they should not be called from a signal handler. In particular, calling pthread_mutex_lock or pthread_mutex_unlock from a signal handler may deadlock the calling thread. RETURN VALUE
pthread_mutex_init always returns 0. The other mutex functions return 0 on success and a non-zero error code on error. ERRORS
The pthread_mutex_lock function returns the following error code on error: EINVAL the mutex has not been properly initialized. EDEADLK the mutex is already locked by the calling thread (``error checking'' mutexes only). The pthread_mutex_trylock function returns the following error codes on error: EBUSY the mutex could not be acquired because it was currently locked. EINVAL the mutex has not been properly initialized. The pthread_mutex_unlock function returns the following error code on error: EINVAL the mutex has not been properly initialized. EPERM the calling thread does not own the mutex (``error checking'' mutexes only). The pthread_mutex_destroy function returns the following error code on error: EBUSY the mutex is currently locked. AUTHOR
Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr> SEE ALSO
pthread_mutexattr_init(3), pthread_mutexattr_setkind_np(3), pthread_cancel(3). EXAMPLE
A shared global variable x can be protected by a mutex as follows: int x; pthread_mutex_t mut = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; All accesses and modifications to x should be bracketed by calls to pthread_mutex_lock and pthread_mutex_unlock as follows: pthread_mutex_lock(&mut); /* operate on x */ pthread_mutex_unlock(&mut); LinuxThreads PTHREAD_MUTEX(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy