Sponsored Content
Top Forums Programming pthread_mutex_lock in ANSI C vs using Atomic builtins of GCC Post 302448272 by Corona688 on Wednesday 25th of August 2010 03:48:41 PM
Old 08-25-2010
Yes, the pthread solution more than sufficiently protects it. (A pthread_rwlock would let readers operate at the same time and only block them for writes.)

If the gcc atomic operations are truly atomic, getva shouldn't ever return garbage.
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Shell Programming and Scripting

Convert file from Unix - ANSI to PC - ANSI

Hi, I am creating a file in Unix using a shell script. The file is getting created in the Unix - ANSI format. My requirement is to convert it to the PC - ANSI format. Can anyone tell me how to do this? Thanks, Sunil (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: ssmallya
0 Replies

2. Programming

pthread_rwlock_lock vs pthread_mutex_lock

I have been wondering what the difference between pthread_rwlock_lock and pthread_mutex_lock is. Both these routines acquire an exclusive rw lock on an enclosed region. So I performed a simple experiment in which I execute both these routines multiple times in a loop. Here are the results:... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: kmehta
1 Replies

3. Programming

Interesting issue with pthread_mutex_lock and siglongjmp in AIX 5.3 (and no other OS)

Executive summary: Code (posted below) cores in AIX 5.3, despite being compiled and run successfully on several other operating systems. Code is attempting to verify that pthread_mutex_lock can be successfully aborted by siglongjmp. I do not believe this is an unreasonable requirement. If... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: DreamWarrior
1 Replies

4. Shell Programming and Scripting

program name and function name builtins

Hi Is there a way to get the program/script name or function name usng built ins. Like in many languages arg holds the program name regards (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: xiamin
2 Replies

5. Programming

why the implementatoin of Bakery algorithm in ANSI C does not work in ANSI C

I follow the description of wiki (Lamport's bakery algorithm - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia), then implement that algorithm in C, but it doesn't work, Starving is still here, is the implementation worry? Only print out: Thread ID: 0 START! Thread ID: 0 END! Thread ID: 0 START!... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: sehang
2 Replies

6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Writing Custom Builtins for KSH93

I am looking to create some ksh93 extensions using the custom builtin feature. I can successfully create a builtin function, load it using the builtin -f command and get an output. However, I want to get/set values of KSH variables from within my built-in. For example, lets say I am creating... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: a_programmer
2 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Why does /bin contain binaries for builtins?

Why do shell builtins like echo and pwd have binaries in /bin? When I do which pwd, I get the one in /bin. that means that I am not using the builtin version? What determines which one gets used? Is the which command a definitive way to determine what is being run when I enter pwd? (16 Replies)
Discussion started by: glev2005
16 Replies

8. Programming

Using ANSI color codes in gcc compiled program

I have put some yellow color codes and works well. I call the funstion using print_usage(stderr, 0); I would like to know if there is any way, to store the ansi color codes in variables and then call them inside fprintf. Or have a format followed by the strings I want to output. ... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: kristinu
5 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Shell and bash builtins...

Not sure if this is the right forum but I have collated a listing of shell and bash builtins. Builtins is a loose word and may include the '/bin' drawer/folder/directory but NOT any others in the path list. In the case of my Macbook Pro, OSX 10.7.5 the enabled internals is also listed... ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: wisecracker
1 Replies
ATOMIC_OPS(3)						   BSD Library Functions Manual 					     ATOMIC_OPS(3)

NAME
atomic_ops -- atomic memory operations SYNOPSIS
#include <sys/atomic.h> DESCRIPTION
The atomic_ops family of functions provide atomic memory operations. There are 7 classes of atomic memory operations available: atomic_add(3) These functions perform atomic addition. atomic_and(3) These functions perform atomic logical ``and''. atomic_cas(3) These functions perform atomic compare-and-swap. atomic_dec(3) These functions perform atomic decrement. atomic_inc(3) These functions perform atomic increment. atomic_or(3) These functions perform atomic logical ``or''. atomic_swap(3) These functions perform atomic swap. Synchronization Mechanisms Where the architecture does not provide hardware support for atomic compare and swap (CAS), atomicity is provided by a restartable sequence or by a spinlock. The chosen method is not ordinarily distinguishable by or visible to users of the interface. The following architectures can be assumed to provide CAS in hardware: alpha, amd64, i386, powerpc, powerpc64, sparc64. Scope and Restrictions If hardware CAS is available, the atomic operations are globally atomic: operations within a memory region shared between processes are guar- anteed to be performed atomically. If hardware CAS is not available, it may only be assumed that the operations are atomic with respect to threads in the same process. Additionally, if hardware CAS is not available, the atomic operations must not be used within a signal handler. Users of atomic memory operations should not make assumptions about how the memory access is performed (specifically, the width of the memory access). For this reason, applications making use of atomic memory operations should limit their use to regular memory. The results of using atomic memory operations on anything other than regular memory are undefined. Users of atomic memory operations should take care to modify any given memory location either entirely with atomic operations or entirely with some other synchronization mechanism. Intermixing of atomic operations with other synchronization mechanisms for the same memory loca- tion results in undefined behavior. Visibility and Ordering of Memory Accesses If hardware CAS is available, stores to the target memory location by an atomic operation will reach global visibility before the operation completes. If hardware CAS is not available, the store may not reach global visibility until some time after the atomic operation has com- pleted. However, in all cases a subsequent atomic operation on the same memory cell will be delayed until the result of any preceeding oper- ation has reached global visibility. Atomic operations are strongly ordered with respect to each other. The global visibility of other loads and stores before and after an atomic operation is undefined. Applications that require synchronization of loads and stores with respect to an atomic operation must use memory barriers. See membar_ops(3). Performance Because atomic memory operations require expensive synchronization at the hardware level, applications should take care to minimize their use. In certain cases, it may be more appropriate to use a mutex, especially if more than one memory location will be modified. SEE ALSO
atomic_add(3), atomic_and(3), atomic_cas(3), atomic_dec(3), atomic_inc(3), atomic_or(3), atomic_swap(3), membar_ops(3) HISTORY
The atomic_ops functions first appeared in NetBSD 5.0. BSD
April 14, 2010 BSD
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:01 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy