Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: SUN T5240 vs M3000
Operating Systems Solaris SUN T5240 vs M3000 Post 302430223 by rajasekg on Thursday 17th of June 2010 02:19:53 AM
Old 06-17-2010
MySQL SUN T5240 vs M3000

Hi,

We are planning to buy new server for our data center. Sun T5240 or M3000 which one have better performance, we are going to create many dt sessions in this server. So, i need your suggestions.

RJS
 

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

raidctl on SUN T5240

Setting up a T5240 with two disks c1t0d0 and c1t1d0. I am trying to use raidctl but when I issue. raidctl -l I get Controller 1 Disk: 0.0.0 Disk: 0.1.0 So I try raidctl -c '0.0.0 0.1.0' -r 1 1 and I get "Array in use." I try (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: photon
4 Replies

2. Solaris

Can't PowerOn M3000 - Bad Data CRC

Hi, I was working on the M3000 and I did a init 0, powered off the system during the weekend. When I tried to poweron today, the XSCF linux boot image keeps on rebooting and does not go to the login for XSCF access. The "Check" LED is on amber. Tried diagnosing but cant get the system up. Any help... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: incredible
1 Replies

3. Solaris

Raidctl - Sun T5240 Solaris 10 Problem

I tried using raidctl earlier today to use my 2 disks in a RAID1 setup and I totally destroyed my OS install. I'm sure I did something funky and it freaked out. No big deal...right? This is what I was seeing after a reboot. I decided to just reinstall the OS. It let me go through all of... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: kingdbag
3 Replies

4. Solaris

XSCF on M3000

Hi, I've updated a few M3000s to new firmware without any hassle, but on one of them the following is happening: XSCF> getflashimage -u wayner ftp://10.16.122.200/tftpboot/IKXCP1102.tar.gz Error: insufficient free space Any idea how to delete whatever old firmware is on there so I can... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: cabaiste
7 Replies

5. Solaris

Bizarre Sun T5240 behavior

Hi - I have a T5240 with 7 LDOMS configured. One night, network comm was broken somehow. Nobody was doing anything on the machine at the time. Here is what I saw in messages: WARNING: nxge3 : nxge_dma_mem_alloc: ddi_dma_mem_alloc kmem alloc failed WARNING: nxge3 : nxge_alloc_rx_buf_dma:... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: pyroman
2 Replies

6. Emergency UNIX and Linux Support

disk replacment, SUN M3000

we have a SUN M3000 server. setup as only 1 domain. disk c0t0d0 and c0t1d0 and setup as SVM mirrors. a few days ago disk T1 failed. new we have replaced the disk, but can's see the disk in format. have done cfgadm and devfsadm. still can't access the new disk in format. the output... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: robsonde
6 Replies

7. Solaris

Application running too slow on Sun SPARC T5440 but run normal on sun M3000

Hi all, I have application running on sun server T5440 4x8x1.4 GHz, 64 GB RAM, application running very slow though load average too low. when I install my application on another server SUN M3000 (One CPU 1x8x2.5GHz, 8GB RAM), application run smoothly. Here is my server T5440 info: ... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: insatiable1610
6 Replies

8. Solaris

Poor performance on an M3000

Hi We have an M3000 single physical processor and 8gb of memory running Solaris 10. This system runs two Oracle Databases one on Oracle 9i and One on Oracle 10g. As soon as the Oracle 10g database starts we see an immediate drop in system performance, for example opening an ssh session can... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: gregsih
6 Replies

9. Solaris

Using a Modem on a T5-2 or a T5240

Hi Folks, Just a quick question - hopefully! I have an application currently running on a V890 with Solaris 9, I'd like to move this to either one of our T-5's or one of the T5240's in a Legacy container on an LDOM - but the fly in the ointment is the application still uses a standard Hayes... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: gull04
3 Replies
x11perfcomp(1X) 														   x11perfcomp(1X)

NAME
x11perfcomp - X11 server performance comparison program SYNOPSIS
x11perfcomp [-r | -ro] [-l label_file] files OPTIONS
x11perfcomp accepts the options listed below: Specifies that the output should also include relative server performance. Specifies that the output should include only relative server performance. Specifies a label file to use. DESCRIPTION
The x11perfcomp program merges the output of several x11perf(1X) runs into a nice tabular format. It takes the results in each file, fills in any missing test results if necessary, and for each test shows the objects/second rate of each server. If invoked with the -r or -ro options, it shows the relative performance of each server to the first server. Normally, x11perfcomp uses the first file specified to determine which specific tests it should report on. Some (non-DEC :) servers may fail to perform all tests. In this case, x11perfcomp automatically substitutes in a rate of 0.0 objects/second. Since the first file determines which tests to report on, this file must contain a superset of the tests reported in the other files, else x11perfcomp will fail. You can provide an explicit list of tests to report on by using the -l switch to specify a file of labels. You can create a label file by using the -label option in x11perf. X DEFAULTS
There are no X defaults used by this program. SEE ALSO
X(1X), x11perf(1X) AUTHORS
Mark Moraes wrote the original scripts to compare servers. Joel McCormack just munged them together a bit. x11perfcomp(1X)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:57 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy