Sponsored Content
Special Forums UNIX and Linux Applications High Performance Computing Memory Barriers for (Ubuntu) Linux (i686) Post 302430141 by gorga on Wednesday 16th of June 2010 06:01:30 PM
Old 06-16-2010
Hi Corona, (small world Smilie)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corona688
You could try using Linux futexes, which handle the nonblocking case completely in userspace, but I'm not sure what that'd do for memory barriers
I hadn't heard of futexes until you mentioned them, but I did some reading and it seems they still use atomic instructions to update shared variables. In that case I could just use one of GCC's built-in atomic operations like "__sync_fetch_ and_ add" or "__sync_bool_compare_and_swap" as described here...

Atomic Builtins - Using the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC)

The thing with these is they use the asm op-code "lock", which issues a hardware lock on the data-bus effectively locking every other process out of memory. Because I'm writing an application that should be scalable for a system with many cores, I'm discouraged by this.

Quote:
Besides, what if you need to move it to MIPS or something?
Could be a possibility, I believe they have made advances into highly parrallel architectures recently, but the project is at a research stage right now so if I can get it to work well on x86 that's good enough for now. I like the sound of this idea though...

Quote:
Could you perhaps reorder it to put prefix, instance, and state in order in memory? You could assemble the data in an MMX or SSE register, then overwrite several structure members in one assembly op.
This could be a good solution, but I'm not sure how to do it. Do you have any examples of similar code as a guide?

Quote:
One thought does occur to me. How large are these structures?
prefix and instance are both uint32_t while state is an enum (guess that means its a uint32_t also?).
 

4 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Memory-waste in Ubuntu/Debian?

I have 512 mem on this laptop, though 'top' tells me I only have 380. However, Ubuntu is using 288 mb of memory, when I only have 3 terminals, running lynx, vim(for this file) and (of course) top. Considering it I have lynx running a 600 page txt file, which of course would eat some memory but 300?... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: riwa
0 Replies

2. Linux

i686, x86 64, ppc

Hi, i am quite new to linux. I am interested in fedora linux distro. Fedora Project I dont know which one to choose, either i686, x86 64 or ppc. I prefer a live cd, coz its easy to use. And what is the difference between "Fedora Desktop Live Media" and "Fedora KDE Live Media". (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: superblacksmith
3 Replies

3. Programming

Getting the total virtual memory for ubuntu in c++

Hi guys , i need to get the total virtual memory in ubuntu but i need to write a C++ code for that, any idea on how to go about doing it? any references? or website that i can refer to ? (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: xiaojesus
6 Replies

4. Ubuntu

XP and Linux (Ubuntu) on same disk, Can I install Ubuntu on not-yet partitioned portion of disk?

My PC (Esprimo, 3 yeas old) has one hard drive having 2 partitions C: (80 GB NTFS, XP) and D: (120 GB NTFS, empty) and and a 200 MB area that yet is not-partitioned. I would like to try Ubuntu and to install Ubuntu on the not-partitioned area . The idea is to have the possibility to run... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: C.Weidemann
7 Replies
RRDTHREADS(1)							      rrdtool							     RRDTHREADS(1)

NAME
rrdthreads - Provisions for linking the RRD library to use in multi-threaded programs SYNOPSIS
Using librrd in multi-threaded programs requires some extra precautions, as the RRD library in its original form was not thread-safe at all. This document describes requirements and pitfalls on the way to use the multi-threaded version of librrd in your own programs. It also gives hints for future RRD development to keep the library thread-safe. Currently only some RRD operations are implemented in a thread-safe way. They all end in the usual ""_r"" suffix. DESCRIPTION
In order to use librrd in multi-threaded programs you must: o Link with librrd_th instead of librrd (use "-lrrd_th" when linking) o Use the ""_r"" functions instead of the normal API-functions o Do not use any at-style time specifications. Parsing of such time specifications is terribly non-thread-safe. o Never use non *"_r" functions unless it is explicitly documented that the function is tread-safe. o Every thread SHOULD call "rrd_get_context()" before its first call to any "librrd_th" function in order to set up thread specific data. This is not strictly required, but it is the only way to test if memory allocation can be done by this function. Otherwise the program may die with a SIGSEGV in a low-memory situation. o Always call "rrd_error_clear()" before any call to the library. Otherwise the call might fail due to some earlier error. NOTES FOR RRD CONTRIBUTORS Some precautions must be followed when developing RRD from now on: o Only use thread-safe functions in library code. Many often used libc functions aren't thread-safe. Take care in the following situations or when using the following library functions: o Direct calls to "strerror()" must be avoided: use "rrd_strerror()" instead, it provides a per-thread error message. o The "getpw*", "getgr*", "gethost*" function families (and some more "get*" functions) are not thread-safe: use the *"_r" variants o Time functions: "asctime", "ctime", "gmtime", "localtime": use *"_r" variants o "strtok": use "strtok_r" o "tmpnam": use "tmpnam_r" o Many others (lookup documentation) o A header file named rrd_is_thread_safe.h is provided that works with the GNU C-preprocessor to "poison" some of the most common non- thread-safe functions using the "#pragma GCC poison" directive. Just include this header in source files you want to keep thread-safe. o Do not introduce global variables! If you really, really have to use a global variable you may add a new field to the "rrd_context" structure and modify rrd_error.c, rrd_thread_safe.c and rrd_non_thread_safe.c o Do not use "getopt" or "getopt_long" in *"_r" (neither directly nor indirectly). "getopt" uses global variables and behaves badly in a multi-threaded application when called concurrently. Instead provide a *_r function taking all options as function parameters. You may provide argc and **argv arguments for variable length argument lists. See "rrd_update_r" as an example. o Do not use the "rrd_parsetime" function! It uses lots of global variables. You may use it in functions not designed to be thread-safe, like in functions wrapping the "_r" version of some operation (e.g., "rrd_create", but not in "rrd_create_r") CURRENTLY IMPLEMENTED THREAD SAFE FUNCTIONS Currently there exist thread-safe variants of "rrd_update", "rrd_create", "rrd_dump", "rrd_info", "rrd_last", and "rrd_fetch". AUTHOR
Peter Stamfest <peter@stamfest.at> 1.4.3 2008-06-08 RRDTHREADS(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:00 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy