Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: GCC for X86 on SOL 10
Operating Systems Solaris GCC for X86 on SOL 10 Post 302427886 by masloff on Tuesday 8th of June 2010 07:42:36 AM
Old 06-08-2010
sometimes sunfreeware.com is a only place to get binaries from...
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Dual boot x86 Sol 10, and Linux

I've loaded sol 10, and I left 20 Gig of 70 free, I can't seem to find a straight forward proc. for loading the Linux RH. Does anyone have one, or can they point me to one ? (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: jdel80
0 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

kernel parameter in SOL

Hello everbody: I have Sol9, and I need to check its kernekl parameters, do you know how to list them or in which file they can be found. Thanks in Advance (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: aladdin
3 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Sol 10 Sendmail issue

We have a Spark Solaris 10 box running behind a Pix 501 firewall, we are running NAT and I have mapped access to it from the outside world. Anyway, we can receive mail no problem just can't send. I receive this message bounce: The original message was received at Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:04:29 -0600... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: varlania
1 Replies

4. Solaris

Installing gcc - recieve error message gcc : cannot execute

AIM- Install Oracle 11g on Solaris using VMWare Steps 1.Logged on as root 2.Created subfolders à /usr/local/bin & /usr/local/bin/gcc 3.Downloaded gcc & libiconv & unzipped them on my harddrive & burnt them on CD 4.Copied files from CD to /usr/local/bin/gcc 5.Terminal (root) à pkgadd -d... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: Ackers
8 Replies

5. Solaris

Need help with mail service on Sol 10

Hello All: I am trying to configure mail service on Solaris 10 and I am unable to send using mailx. It appears the server may not be listening on port 25: bash-3.00# mconnect connecting to host localhost (127.0.0.1), port 25 connect: Connection refused services is configured to use port... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: hoo5091
7 Replies

6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

luupgrade: Sol 8 -> Sol 10 u7 (5/09)

Greetings Forumers! I ran into an issue after running luupgrade on v880 running Solaris 8. I want to upgrade to Solaris 10. When I rebooted the system I noticed the file systems listed as such: # df -h Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on /dev/dsk/c1t1d0s0 ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: bluescreen
2 Replies

7. Solaris

Can't boot from burned Sol 10 x86 DVD

Hi all- I am trying to boot from a Solaris 10 DVD which I burned from the ISO I d/l from Sun(Oracle). I checked the byte counts of the image on Sun's website and my system and they are the same. I and using cdrecord from Schilly and burning the DVD like so: cdrecord -v dev=0,0,0 -dao... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: bluescreen
0 Replies

8. Solaris

Sol 11 express X86:Dual monitor config,max resolution

Hello! I have some X86 desktop computer with G45 embedded dual-head video. Two monitors can be configured, but with "small" problem: the summ of dimensions in any direction (vert or horis) can't exceed 1680 pix- max sizeof virtual screen area. Attempts to edit "videoram" parameter in xorg.conf... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: urry_buh
0 Replies

9. Solaris

JASS - upgrading from Sol 9 to Sol 10

Do I need to reinstall/rerun JASS after upgrading from Sol9 to Sol10? Just wondered if the upgrade procedure overwrote any of the settings etc? (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: psychocandy
0 Replies

10. Solaris

Usbcopy fails with the error message sol-11_1-live-x86.usb is not a multiple of 512

I am trying to create a live image of solaris 11.1. I have used #pkg image-update to upgrade from 11 to 11.1 already. (since only 11.1 can make images of 11.1 due to using new grub) then from within 11.1 I used pkg install install distribution-constructor to get latest usbcopy that should be... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: taltamir
1 Replies
ERROR::BUILDID(7stap)													     ERROR::BUILDID(7stap)

NAME
error::buildid - build-id verification failures DESCRIPTION
Because systemtap's script translation / execution stages may be executed at different times and places, it is sometimes necessary to ver- ify certain invariants. One such invariant is that if a script was informed by translate-time analysis of executables, then those same executables need to be used at run time. This checking is done based upon the build-id, a binary hash that modern (post-2007) compil- ers/toolchains add as an NT_GNU_BUILD_ID ELF note to object files and executables. Use the readelf -n command to examine the build-ids of binaries, if you are interested. Only scripts are sensitive to executables' build-ids: generally those that perform deep analysis of the binaries or their debuginfo. For example, scripts that place .function or .statement probes, or use stack backtrace-related tapset functions may be sensitive. Other scripts that rely only on process.mark or kernel.trace probes do not require debuginfo. See the DWARF DEBUGINFO section in the stap- probes(3stap) man page. During translation, systemtap saves a copy of the relevant files' build-ids within the compiled modules. At run-time, the modules compare the saved ones to the actual run-time build-ids in memory. The error message indicates that they did not match, so the module will decline placing a probe that was computed based upon obsolete data. This is important for safety, as placing them at an inappropriate address could crash the programs. However, this is not necessarily a fatal error, since probes unrelated to the mismatching binaries may operate. A build-id mismatch could be caused by a few different situations. The main one is where the executable versions or architecture were dif- ferent between the systemtap translation and execution times/places. For example, one may run a stap-server on a slightly different ver- sion of the OS distribution. The kernel running on the workstation may be slightly different from the version being targeted - perhaps due to a pending kernel upgrade leaving different files on disk versus running in memory. If your OS distribution uses separate debuginfo packages, the split .IR .debug files may not exactly match the main binaries. SEE ALSO
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureBuildId, stap(1), stapprobes(3stap), warning::debuginfo(7stap), error::reporting(7stap) ERROR::BUILDID(7stap)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:40 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy