04-21-2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rodrigoroma
Now trying to understand the recursive ACL...
Just to add some info, you might want to have a look at the richer
NFSv4 ACLs... some systems only support this kind of ACLs and will compain if you try to use POSIX ACLs.
8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Cybersecurity
Hi all,
I've just been handled the responsibility for a FTP-site. Having no experiens of UNIX at all. And now one of my users needs to have full access to the usr directory and all it's subdirectories, don't know why just trying to do what the boss tells me. The type of UNIX is FreeBSD and the... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: -tri-
4 Replies
2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hello genius..!
what do y'all think of these questions...? help appreciated...!
Access Control Lists and privileges....
# Why both file ACLs and user permissions/privileges (not to be confused with rights in ACLs) are used in Windows access control (why not just use one of these)?
# In... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: heroine
1 Replies
3. Linux
Hi, I want to know what does the "effective" comment means in the output of the getfacl and whether it has to do with the acl mask...
thanks (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Gartlar
0 Replies
4. Solaris
Can i get the synopsis for add multiple users in single command for ACL access for a directory or a file
thanks in advance
dinu (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: dinu
3 Replies
5. HP-UX
Hello,
I try to find what year HP-UX got support for ACL (Access Control List)? I know that HP-UX was the first Unix with ACL support, but it is very hard to find the information on when that occured.
So anyone here know when that did happen?
Any answers are appreciated,
/eXpander (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: eXpander
1 Replies
6. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hi Friends,
I went through the ACL threads that were posted in the past but none were matching to my requirement . Hence starting a new thread .
Challenge :
user : a
group : Test1
user: b
group: Test2
Say under user a i create dir /tmp/debug with the privilege of 755 and also... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: leobreaker
3 Replies
7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hi..
Could someone explain about setfacl,getfacl in unix and its uses.
Regards,
Suresh (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: suresh sunkara
1 Replies
8. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
All,
I am trying to clear ACL's completely from all files and folders in a directory. I can get the directories as cleared as:
# owner: root
# group: root
user::rwx
group::r-x
other::rwx
default:user::rwx
default:group::r-x
default:other::r-x
What ever I do I can't remove the... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: hburnswell
4 Replies
LEARN ABOUT SUSE
acl_equiv_mode
ACL_EQUIV_MODE(3) BSD Library Functions Manual ACL_EQUIV_MODE(3)
NAME
acl_equiv_mode -- check for an equivalent ACL
LIBRARY
Linux Access Control Lists library (libacl, -lacl).
SYNOPSIS
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <acl/libacl.h>
int
acl_equiv_mode(acl_t acl, mode_t *mode_p);
DESCRIPTION
The acl_equiv_mode() function checks if the ACL pointed to by the argument acl contains only the required ACL entries of tag types
ACL_USER_OBJ, ACL_GROUP_OBJ, and ACL_OTHER, and contains no permissions other that ACL_READ, ACL_WRITE or ACL_EXECUTE. If the ACL has this
form, it can can be fully represented with the traditional file permission bits, and is considered equivalent with the traditional file per-
mission bits.
If acl is an equivalent ACL and the pointer mode_p is not NULL, the value pointed to by mode_p is set to the value that defines the same
owner, group and other permissions as contained in the ACL.
RETURN VALUE
On success, this function returns the value 0 if acl is an equivalent ACL, and the value 1 if acl is not an equivalent ACL. On error, the
value -1 is returned, and errno is set appropriately.
ERRORS
If any of the following conditions occur, the acl_equiv_mode() function returns the value -1 and sets errno to the corresponding value:
[EINVAL] The argument acl is not a valid pointer to an ACL.
STANDARDS
This is a non-portable, Linux specific extension to the ACL manipulation functions defined in IEEE Std 1003.1e draft 17 ("POSIX.1e", aban-
doned).
SEE ALSO
acl_from_mode(3), acl(5)
AUTHOR
Written by Andreas Gruenbacher <a.gruenbacher@bestbits.at>.
Linux ACL March 23, 2002 Linux ACL