Sponsored Content
Operating Systems HP-UX Bad performance but Low CPU loading? Post 302411428 by methyl on Thursday 8th of April 2010 12:50:32 PM
Old 04-08-2010
"top" is not much of a tool for diagnosing performance issues.

Do you have "glance".
Do you have "sar".
What Database Engine is this?

First let's find out how much memory you have. The figures from "top" are rarely correct.

Code:
/usr/sbin/swapinfo -mt

 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

CPU Loading

How can I measure CPU loading (like performance monitor in Windows OS). I use Solaris but I would like to write portable code. Besides, I have to write programm to load CPU with known percent. How can I use CPU in 30% for example. Thanks for any ideas. (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: serge
6 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

comparing Huge Files - Performance is very bad

Hi All, Can you please help me in resolving the following problem? My requirement is like this: 1) I have two files YESTERDAY_FILE and TODAY_FILE. Each one is having nearly two million data. 2) I need to check each record of TODAY_FILE in YESTERDAY_FILE. If exists we can skip that by... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: madhukalyan
5 Replies

3. AIX

Bad performance when log in with putty

Hello guys! I'm n00b in AIX and I'm sticked in a problem. (my English is poor enough, but I hope you can understand me :P). So.. I'm trying to connect to an AIX machine with putty, and .. 'using username xxx' appears after 2 sec (OK), but 'xxx@ip's password' appears after 1:15 min. After... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: combat2k
6 Replies

4. Solaris

Low average cpu utilization.

Hi to all, i have an app on solaris 5.8 writed in C++ (3.2.1) that use multi threading. Hardware has 8 cpu. When i run my app i note that the average of cpu go at least at 40%, and the performance are not so higher.. There is a cpu limitation on solaris, that dedicate only a part of cpu... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Moodie
3 Replies

5. Solaris

Sun T1000 application low performance

Hello All. I have Sun T1000 server with Solaris 10. On T1000 installed EMC smarts, application for monitoring network devices via SNMP + SNMP. So, Smarts has own DB (contains object - devices and relationships), file takes 30 mb, now, all queries to DB works very slow, so Smarts works too slow,... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: hemulll
5 Replies

6. Solaris

By loading I have received the following issue: BAD PBR SIGN.

Hi folks. By disk cloning on Solaris x86, I used a command dd. I pulled out the source and inserted the new disk. By loading I have received the following issue: BAD PBR SIGN. :( (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: wolfgang
5 Replies

7. Solaris

Performance (iops) becomes bad, what is the reason?

I have written a virtual HBA driver named "xmp_vhba". A scsi disk is attached on it. as shown below: xmp_vhba, instance #0 disk, instance #11 But the performance became very bad when we read/write the scsi disk using the vdbench(a read/write io tool). What is the reason? ... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: ForgetChen
7 Replies

8. AIX

High Runqueue (R) LOW CPU LOW I/O Low Network Low memory usage

Hello All I have a system running AIX 61 shared uncapped partition (with 11 physical processors, 24 Virtual 72GB of Memory) . The output from NMON, vmstat show a high run queue (60+) for continous periods of time intervals, but NO paging, relatively low I/o (6000) , CPU % is 40, Low network.... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: IL-Malti
9 Replies

9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

CPU with long hours in top, is this bad?

Hi, We have a Solaris server that has about 43 Oracle databases on it and we also have the Oracle Enterprise Manager - emagent that is used to monitor these databases When running top, the emagent is showing as one of the top process. Excerpts from running top shows something as below: ... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: newbie_01
3 Replies

10. AIX

AIX lpar bad disk I/O performance - 4k per IO limitation ?

Hi Guys, I have fresh new installed VIO 2.2.3.70 on a p710, 3 physical SAS disks, rootvg on hdisk0 and 3 VIO clients through vscsi, AIX7.1tl4 AIX6.1tl9 RHEL6.5ppc, each lpar has its rootvg installed on a LV on datavg (hdisk2) mapped to vhost0,1,2 There is no vg on hdisk1, I use it for my... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: frenchy59
1 Replies
unix_master(9r) 														   unix_master(9r)

NAME
unix_master - General: Forces execution onto the master CPU SYNOPSIS
void unix_master( void ); ARGUMENTS
None DESCRIPTION
The unix_master routine forces execution of the kernel thread onto the master CPU (also called the boot CPU). In other words, unix_master binds the kernel thread to the master CPU. To release the kernel thread from the bind to the master CPU, call the unix_release routine. You can make recursive calls to unix_master as long as you make an equal number of calls to unix_release. The unix_master routine provides another way besides the simple and complex lock routines to make a kernel module symmetric multiprocessing (SMP) safe. Although calling unix_master is not optimal for performance on an SMP CPU, it does provide third-party kernel module writers with an easy way to make their modules SMP safe without using the lock routines. NOTES
Device drivers should not directly call the unix_master and unix_release routines. One exception to this recommendation is when you want a device driver's kernel threads to run only on the master CPU. This situation occurs when your driver creates and starts its own kernel threads and you set the d_funnel member of the associated dsent structure to the value DEV_FUNNEL. In this case, each kernel thread must call unix_master once to ensure that the kernel thread runs only on the master CPU. Remember to make a corresponding call to unix_release. CAUTIONS
To avoid deadlock, do not call the unix_master routine under the following circumstances: When holding a simple lock In the driver's inter- rupt service routine RETURN VALUES
None SEE ALSO
routines: unix_release(9r) unix_master(9r)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:03 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy