Sponsored Content
The Lounge What is on Your Mind? Networks alternative to Internet Post 302401915 by Action on Monday 8th of March 2010 08:59:26 AM
Old 03-08-2010
Networks alternative to Internet

I've read about BITNET, CompuServe... CompuServe was probably not a network but an online service. Are (were) there any other networks alternative to Internet? Does anyone have experience with them? Do they still exist, is it possible to access them over Internet? There seems not to be another way at the moment... Generally, who can tell more about them?
 

7 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. AIX

AIX versus Networks

HI folks, Actually i have a network engineer having 2 and 1/2 years of experience in cisco having CCNA certification also. Now my company offering me to move to AIX field. I am new to AIX and do not know more about that field. So i want a suggestion from you peoples, that I have to join AIX or... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: rawatmohinder
5 Replies

2. Linux

SFTP an internet address from a system behind an internet proxy

I was wondering if it is possible to setup SFTP to go through the internet proxy while connecting to an internet location. Problem: Client system is behind internet proxy. SFTP to any internet location fails as there is no documented way to configure SFTP to connect to internet locations through... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: toobrown1
4 Replies

3. Solaris

Multiple networks on same server

If I have 2 interfaces in a server on the same subnet/network does Solaris automatically choose to route packets destined for this network out the first interface. I.e if ce0 and ce1 were on same network ce0 would be chosen as it's first interface? (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: Actuator
5 Replies

4. IP Networking

solaris routing between two networks

ce0: flags=1100843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,ROUTER,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2 inet 10.162.212.132 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.162.212.255 ether 0:14:4f:55:82:9 ce1: flags=1100843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,ROUTER,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3 inet 10.231.11.232 netmask... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: busyboy
1 Replies

5. Solaris

solaris routing between two networks

ce0: flags=1100843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,ROUTER,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2 inet 10.162.212.132 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.162.212.255 ether 0:14:4f:55:82:9 ce1: flags=1100843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,ROUTER,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3 inet 10.231.11.232 netmask... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: busyboy
3 Replies

6. What is on Your Mind?

What Social Networks Do You Use Regularly?

What Online Social Networks Do You Use Regularly? I use Facebook and LinkedIn nearly everyday.... You? If your online social network is not listed, please do a "write in" vote.. Thanks! (39 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
39 Replies

7. AIX

Setting up NIM for different networks

Hi, I am struggling setting up a NIM master to serve hosts on a network that is not directly accessible through the "master"-s default interface. I now that I need to set up network definitions and maybe NIM routes, but got confused. The master has 2 interfaces: * en0 holding the address... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: trifo75
8 Replies
MAILADDR(7)					       BSD Miscellaneous Information Manual					       MAILADDR(7)

NAME
mailaddr -- mail addressing description DESCRIPTION
Mail addresses are based on the Internet protocol listed at the end of this manual page. These addresses are in the general format user@domain where a domain is a hierarchical dot separated list of subdomains. For example, a valid address is: eric@CS.Berkeley.EDU Unlike some other forms of addressing, domains do not imply any routing. Thus, although this address is specified as an Internet address, it might travel by an alternate route if that were more convenient or efficient. For example, at Berkeley, the associated message would proba- bly go directly to CS over the Ethernet rather than going via the Berkeley Internet gateway. Abbreviation. Under certain circumstances it may not be necessary to type the entire domain name. In general, anything following the first dot may be omitted if it is the same as the domain from which you are sending the message. For example, a user on ``calder.berkeley.edu'' could send to ``eric@CS'' without adding the ``berkeley.edu'' since it is the same on both sending and receiving hosts. Compatibility. Certain old address formats are converted to the new format to provide compatibility with the previous mail system. In particular, user@host and user@host.domain are allowed; host.domain!user is converted to user@host.domain and host!user is converted to user@host.UUCP This is normally converted back to the ``host!user'' form before being sent on for compatibility with older UUCP hosts. Case Distinctions. Domain names (i.e., anything after the ``@'' sign) may be given in any mixture of upper and lower case with the exception of UUCP hostnames. Most hosts accept any combination of case in user names, with the notable exception of MULTICS sites. Route-addrs. Under some circumstances it may be necessary to route a message through several hosts to get it to the final destination. Normally this routing is done automatically, but sometimes it is desirable to route the message manually. Addresses which show these relays are termed ``route-addrs.'' These use the syntax: <@hosta,@hostb:user@hostc> This specifies that the message should be sent to hosta, from there to hostb, and finally to hostc. This path is forced even if there is a more efficient path to hostc. Route-addrs occur frequently on return addresses, since these are generally augmented by the software at each host. It is generally possible to ignore all but the ``user@hostc'' part of the address to determine the actual sender. [Note: the route-addr syntax is officially deprecated in RFC 1123 and should not be used.] Many sites also support the ``percent hack'' for simplistic routing: user%hostc%hostb@hosta is routed as indicated in the previous example. Postmaster. Every site is required to have a user or user alias designated ``postmaster'' to which problems with the mail system may be addressed. Other Networks. Some other networks can be reached by giving the name of the network as the last component of the domain. This is not a standard feature and may not be supported at all sites. For example, messages to CSNET or BITNET sites can often be sent to ``user@host.CSNET'' or ``user@host.BITNET'' respectively. SEE ALSO
mail(1), sendmail(8) Crocker, D. H., Standard for the Format of Arpa Internet Text Messages, RFC822. HISTORY
Mailaddr appeared in 4.2BSD. BUGS
The RFC822 group syntax (``group:user1,user2,user3;'') is not supported except in the special case of ``group:;'' because of a conflict with old berknet-style addresses. Route-Address syntax is grotty. UUCP- and Internet-style addresses do not coexist politely. BSD
June 16, 1993 BSD
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:14 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy