Sponsored Content
Top Forums Programming write() issue during a low level hdd access Post 302397288 by sponnusa on Sunday 21st of February 2010 06:10:44 PM
Old 02-21-2010
thank you.

So, there is no way around it without writing a device driver to handle the read/write operations? Is that right?

I have a utility written in python which able to identify the bad sectors exactly as the same way as the C program. I am not sure, if python would have implemented anything internally (a device driver) to achieve this. I'm currently downloading the python source code to analyse.

I am sure C is more low level then python (which is btw the dumbest statement, i've said Smilie) and should be able to achieve it. It's little weird that the program fails to identify the bad sectors. I have analysed the following programs so far for such an implementation. And all have the same code.

Testdisk, dd, ddrescue, badblocks etc.,.

So does this conclude that the none of the above available usermode linux opensource programs are really doing what they are claiming for? (data recovery / forensics utilities?) All the above program implements O_DIRECT options too.

Well, I guess I am in need of a fix now! Smilie

It also sounds a little weird that there are no user mode programs (not even one?) available in linux that can do a direct I/O with the disk. (Except that I am willing to write one using the libata / scsi libraries which can directly talk to the ATA (PATA / SATA) devices using ATA protocol (i've done this in dos using assembly) and SG / SCSI protocol to the scsi devices).

Anyways, thanks for all your input and guidance. Atleast it got me to do the O_DIRECT implementation. Please update this thread if there are any more information to be shared / assisted.

Thanks again for all the help. Smilie
 

7 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Low level format?

I want to do a low level format like in windows (C:\format c:) but I don't know how it works in unix or linux.. Can somebody help me ? thnx :) (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: day
3 Replies

2. HP-UX

Access to a second HDD

Hello How to access to a second hard disk on a HP-UX system? Thanks (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: ouniss
3 Replies

3. IP Networking

Best reference for understanding low level info on nic cards drivers and functionality

Hi, What is the best reference that gives in detail on nic cards configuration , assigning multiple ip addresses to a single interface, netlink library etc and all basic stuff at this level..? Thanks (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Gopi Krishna P
2 Replies

4. AIX

High Runqueue (R) LOW CPU LOW I/O Low Network Low memory usage

Hello All I have a system running AIX 61 shared uncapped partition (with 11 physical processors, 24 Virtual 72GB of Memory) . The output from NMON, vmstat show a high run queue (60+) for continous periods of time intervals, but NO paging, relatively low I/o (6000) , CPU % is 40, Low network.... (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: IL-Malti
9 Replies

5. Programming

System calls and C language low-level qualities???

Hi friends, I hope everyone is fine and doing well. I queried in my previous thread about the low-level qualities of C/C++ languages.I really thank you people for explaining, it was really helpful. One more ambiquity that I have in my mind is regarding the unix system calls like open, creat,... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: gabam
1 Replies

6. Programming

Why is C/C++ considered low-level languages???

Hi friends, I hope everyone is doing well and fine. I have always been hearing that C/C++ are relatively low-level as compared to Java/C# etc. Could you please tell me some low-level qualities of C/C++? And I think disk deframenters are written in C/C++, please correct me if I am wrong. And please... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: gabam
5 Replies

7. Programming

Low level X11 programming

How to use X11 without Xlib not XCB? How draw window directly on low level? I must use anyway window manager like Motif? I have ridden that X11 has server-client architecture, client send via TCP/IP to port 6000 request for primitives and get replies. Where is detailed description of it? In X11... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: AndrzejB
0 Replies
pthread_rwlock_trywrlock(3)				     Library Functions Manual				       pthread_rwlock_trywrlock(3)

NAME
pthread_rwlock_trywrlock - Attempts to acquire a read-write lock for write access without waiting. LIBRARY
DECthreads POSIX 1003.1c Library (libpthread.so) SYNOPSIS
#include <pthread.h> int pthread_rwlock_trywrlock( pthread_rwlock_t *rwlock); PARAMETERS
Address of the read-write lock object to acquire for write access. DESCRIPTION
This routine attempts to acquire the read-write lock referenced by rwlock for write access. If any thread already holds that lock for write access or read access, this routine fails and returns [EBUSY] and the calling thread does not wait for the lock to become available. Results are undefined if the calling thread holds the read-write lock (whether for read or write access) at the time this routine is called. If the read-write lock object referenced by rwlock is not initialized, the results of calling this routine are undefined. Realtime applications can encounter priority inversion when using read-write locks. The problem occurs when a high-priority thread acquires a read-write lock that is about to be unlocked (that is, posted) by a low-priority thread, but the low-priority thread is preempted by a medium-priority thread. This scenario leads to priority inversion in that a high-priority thread is blocked by lower-priority threads for an unlimited period of time. During system design, realtime programmers must take into account the possibility of priority inversion and can deal with it in a number of ways, such as by having critical sections that are guarded by read-write locks execute at a high priority, so that a thread cannot be preempted while executing in its critical section. RETURN VALUES
If an error condition occurs, this routine returns an integer value indicating the type of error. Possible return values are as follows: Successful completion. The read-write lock could not be acquired for write access because it was already locked for write access or for read access. The value specified by rwlock does not refer to an initialized read-write lock object. The current thread already owns the read-write lock for write or read access. ERRORS
None RELATED INFORMATION
Functions: pthread_rwlock_init(3), pthread_rwlockattr_init(3), pthread_rwlock_rdlock(3), pthread_rwlock_wrlock(3), pthread_rwlock_unlock(3) Manuals: Guide to DECthreads and Programmer's Guide delim off pthread_rwlock_trywrlock(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:23 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy