Sponsored Content
Special Forums UNIX and Linux Applications High Performance Computing What does high performance computing mean? Post 302392877 by Andre_Merzky on Saturday 6th of February 2010 02:23:49 AM
Old 02-06-2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neo
However, as I said "High Performance Computing" is a term which is subjective according to the user and/or the marketing objectives of the company using it.
We can probably discuss endlessly, and its fine if we have a different perspective on the topic. But for the sake of discussion, I'd like to reply anyway: it is the area I am working in, and I have thus some vested interest to represent it in a way I deem correct, but also I am interested to see how other people perceive the topic.

I absolutely grant you that the term HPC has a variable definition, in the sense that (a) problems and computers perceived as HPC vary over time, and (b) that it is often used as a marketing label. But that can be said for many aspects in IT: security, Cloud Computing, Grid Computing, P2P, ...

That does not mean that there is not a clear definition, or at least a clear understanding, on what HPC encompasses: in general, it is the area in IT which tries to solve advanced computational intensive problems on clusters or supercomputers.

Now, 'advanced computational problems' - that's a flexible term, and 'clusters' have not been around a couple of years ago, and who knows what the HPC resources will look like in 5 years. But people working in the area have a pretty good understanding of what advanced problems are (no obvious satisfyingly performant solution known on commodity hardware), and of what clusters and supercomputers are.

Best, Andre.

Last edited by Andre_Merzky; 02-06-2010 at 03:30 AM.. Reason: typo
 

6 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. AIX

Performance Problem - High CPU utilization

Hello everybody. I have a problem with my AIX 5.3. Recently my unix shows a high cpu utilization with sar or topas. I need to find what I have to do to solve this problem, in fact, I don't know what is my problem. I had the same problem with another AIX 5.3 running the same... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: wilder.mellotto
2 Replies

2. High Performance Computing

IBM Scheduler for High Throughput Computing on IBM Blue Gene P

A lightweight scheduler that supports high-throughput computing (HTC) applications on Blue Gene/P. (NEW: 06/12/2008 in grid) More... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Linux Bot
0 Replies

3. High Performance Computing

High Performance Computing

I am interested in setting up some High Performance Computing clusters and would like to get people's views and experiences on this. I have 2 requirements: 1. Compute clusters to do fast cpu intensive computations 2. Storage clusters of parallel and extendable filesystems spread across many... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: humbletech99
6 Replies

4. High Performance Computing

High performance Linkpack

hello everyone , Im new to HPL. i wanted to know whether High performance linpack solves linear system of equations for single precision airthmatic on LINUX. it works for double precision , so is there any HPL version which is for single precision.\ thanks . (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: rahul_viz
0 Replies

5. Emergency UNIX and Linux Support

Performance investigation, very high runq-sz %runocc

I've just been handed a hot potato from a colleague who left :(... our client has been complaining about slow performance on one of our servers. I'm not very experienced in investigating performance issues so I hoping someone will be so kind to provide some guidance Here is an overview of the... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: Solarius
8 Replies

6. High Performance Computing

High Performance Linpack Compiling Issue

I'm trying to compile Linpack on a Ubuntu cluster. I'm running MPI. I've modified the following values to fit my system TOPdir MPdir LAlib CC LINKER. When compiling I get the following error: (the error is at the end, the other errors in between are because I've ran the script several times so... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: JPJPJPJP
0 Replies
GIT-RERERE(1)							    Git Manual							     GIT-RERERE(1)

NAME
git-rerere - Reuse recorded resolution of conflicted merges SYNOPSIS
git rerere [clear|forget <pathspec>|diff|remaining|status|gc] DESCRIPTION
In a workflow employing relatively long lived topic branches, the developer sometimes needs to resolve the same conflicts over and over again until the topic branches are done (either merged to the "release" branch, or sent out and accepted upstream). This command assists the developer in this process by recording conflicted automerge results and corresponding hand resolve results on the initial manual merge, and applying previously recorded hand resolutions to their corresponding automerge results. Note You need to set the configuration variable rerere.enabled in order to enable this command. COMMANDS
Normally, git rerere is run without arguments or user-intervention. However, it has several commands that allow it to interact with its working state. clear Reset the metadata used by rerere if a merge resolution is to be aborted. Calling git am [--skip|--abort] or git rebase [--skip|--abort] will automatically invoke this command. forget <pathspec> Reset the conflict resolutions which rerere has recorded for the current conflict in <pathspec>. diff Display diffs for the current state of the resolution. It is useful for tracking what has changed while the user is resolving conflicts. Additional arguments are passed directly to the system diff command installed in PATH. status Print paths with conflicts whose merge resolution rerere will record. remaining Print paths with conflicts that have not been autoresolved by rerere. This includes paths whose resolutions cannot be tracked by rerere, such as conflicting submodules. gc Prune records of conflicted merges that occurred a long time ago. By default, unresolved conflicts older than 15 days and resolved conflicts older than 60 days are pruned. These defaults are controlled via the gc.rerereunresolved and gc.rerereresolved configuration variables respectively. DISCUSSION
When your topic branch modifies an overlapping area that your master branch (or upstream) touched since your topic branch forked from it, you may want to test it with the latest master, even before your topic branch is ready to be pushed upstream: o---*---o topic / o---o---o---*---o---o master For such a test, you need to merge master and topic somehow. One way to do it is to pull master into the topic branch: $ git checkout topic $ git merge master o---*---o---+ topic / / o---o---o---*---o---o master The commits marked with * touch the same area in the same file; you need to resolve the conflicts when creating the commit marked with +. Then you can test the result to make sure your work-in-progress still works with what is in the latest master. After this test merge, there are two ways to continue your work on the topic. The easiest is to build on top of the test merge commit +, and when your work in the topic branch is finally ready, pull the topic branch into master, and/or ask the upstream to pull from you. By that time, however, the master or the upstream might have been advanced since the test merge +, in which case the final commit graph would look like this: $ git checkout topic $ git merge master $ ... work on both topic and master branches $ git checkout master $ git merge topic o---*---o---+---o---o topic / / o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o---+ master When your topic branch is long-lived, however, your topic branch would end up having many such "Merge from master" commits on it, which would unnecessarily clutter the development history. Readers of the Linux kernel mailing list may remember that Linus complained about such too frequent test merges when a subsystem maintainer asked to pull from a branch full of "useless merges". As an alternative, to keep the topic branch clean of test merges, you could blow away the test merge, and keep building on top of the tip before the test merge: $ git checkout topic $ git merge master $ git reset --hard HEAD^ ;# rewind the test merge $ ... work on both topic and master branches $ git checkout master $ git merge topic o---*---o-------o---o topic / o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o---+ master This would leave only one merge commit when your topic branch is finally ready and merged into the master branch. This merge would require you to resolve the conflict, introduced by the commits marked with *. However, this conflict is often the same conflict you resolved when you created the test merge you blew away. git rerere helps you resolve this final conflicted merge using the information from your earlier hand resolve. Running the git rerere command immediately after a conflicted automerge records the conflicted working tree files, with the usual conflict markers <<<<<<<, =======, and >>>>>>> in them. Later, after you are done resolving the conflicts, running git rerere again will record the resolved state of these files. Suppose you did this when you created the test merge of master into the topic branch. Next time, after seeing the same conflicted automerge, running git rerere will perform a three-way merge between the earlier conflicted automerge, the earlier manual resolution, and the current conflicted automerge. If this three-way merge resolves cleanly, the result is written out to your working tree file, so you do not have to manually resolve it. Note that git rerere leaves the index file alone, so you still need to do the final sanity checks with git diff (or git diff -c) and git add when you are satisfied. As a convenience measure, git merge automatically invokes git rerere upon exiting with a failed automerge and git rerere records the hand resolve when it is a new conflict, or reuses the earlier hand resolve when it is not. git commit also invokes git rerere when committing a merge result. What this means is that you do not have to do anything special yourself (besides enabling the rerere.enabled config variable). In our example, when you do the test merge, the manual resolution is recorded, and it will be reused when you do the actual merge later with the updated master and topic branch, as long as the recorded resolution is still applicable. The information git rerere records is also used when running git rebase. After blowing away the test merge and continuing development on the topic branch: o---*---o-------o---o topic / o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o master $ git rebase master topic o---*---o-------o---o topic / o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o master you could run git rebase master topic, to bring yourself up-to-date before your topic is ready to be sent upstream. This would result in falling back to a three-way merge, and it would conflict the same way as the test merge you resolved earlier. git rerere will be run by git rebase to help you resolve this conflict. GIT
Part of the git(1) suite Git 1.8.3.1 06/10/2014 GIT-RERERE(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:33 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy