12-10-2009
Dear Sparcman,
Thanks for your support.Its wroking fine.
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Solaris
Hi All,
Kindly help me in configuring IPMP or guid me to some link, tried goggling however no luck.
Thanks in anticipation (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: kumarmani
1 Replies
2. Solaris
Hi All,
I have unplumbed one interface.
after that ifconfig -a shows that
lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
e1000g0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: jegaraman
7 Replies
3. Solaris
Probe-based IPMP active - active
Probe-based IPMP active - passive
Link-based only active -standby
????
What are differences between
Probe-based IPMP active - passive anddd
Link-based only active -standby
???!!!
For example in active active probe-based IPMP there are
lets... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: samar
6 Replies
4. Solaris
Guide me in setting up IPMP on solaris 10 box .
my system has 2 physical interface
bge0 - not used
bge1 - 10.10.10.10
bge1:1 - 10.10.10.11
please guide , how can i implement IPMP on this server , how many additional test ip is required ? , as 2 ip's are configured on bge1 interface ,... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: skamal4u
3 Replies
5. Solaris
Hi,
based on your experience what is the most common IPMP configuration on a two nodes cluster for HA failover / scalable services?
...active-active, active-standby with probe-based failure detection etc.
Thanks (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: gxmsgx
3 Replies
6. Solaris
Hi,
I've a problem when try to detach nic e1000g1.
IPMP configuration:
# ifconfig -a
...cut...
e1000g1: flags=1000842<BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 7
inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0
ether 0:c:29:67:16:ef
e1000g2: flags=1000842<BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4>... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: gxmsgx
3 Replies
7. Solaris
Hi all,
Currently i got a server which had two interface. I had study the <SystemAdministration Guide: IP> but still donno what is the correct step to configure it. Can u all help me on it? thanks
# ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: SmartAntz
6 Replies
8. Solaris
Hi All,
Need your help to explaining why when i configure 2 interface IPMP active-standby appear, INACTIVE and DEPRECATED parameter, detail screen shoot as below :
root@machine01 # ifconfig -a
e1000g0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 7
inet... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Wong_Cilacap
6 Replies
9. Solaris
Can any one please explain me the concept behind IPMP in solaris clustering.Basic explanation would be really appreciated...
Thanks in Advance
vks (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: vks47
2 Replies
10. Solaris
Hi,
I have two physical interface connected to solaris box.
1. e1000g1
2. e1000g2
I have added these interfaced under a same IPMP group "IPMP1"
After that I have configured a test address for e1000g1 like below
ifconfig e1000g1 addif <ip-address> netmask + broadcast + -failover... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: praveensharma21
1 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
filter_backends
FILTER
BACKENDS(7) Miscellaneous Information Manual FILTER BACKENDS(7)
NAME
filter_backends - output drivers for the filtergen packet filter compiler
INTRODUCTION
This document describes the status and feature-set of the currently available filtergen backends.
IPTABLES
Most development is done first against the iptables driver. It supports reject, masquerading, transparent proxying, logging (with text)
and sub-groups, all of which should work fine (though the latter has only recently been fixed).
IPCHAINS
The ipchains driver supports all of the above features, too. Its state model is much weaker though, of course. The forwarding support
should work OK, though it is not possible to support "local"-only packets.
IPFILTER
The ipfilter backend is incomplete. It supports accept, drop, reject and logging, but not masq, transproxy or sub-groups. It should be
easy for someone with knowledge of ipfilter to add support for the other features. Options for OpenBSD "pf" features and syntax would be
nice, too. It has received no testing; I don't even know if the generated filters are syntactically correct.
CISCO
The cisco driver is in roughly the same sort of state as the ipfilter one. Additionally, because of the limitations of IOS ACLs, it sup-
ports only a limited set of features. It cannot support reject or transparent proxying, and may not be able to support masquerading
either. An option for reflexive (stateful) ACLs would be very useful.
I understand that Cisco PIX firewalls use a variant of this syntax -- it would be very nice to support them too.
SEE ALSO
filtergen(8), filter_syntax(5)
January 7, 2004 FILTER BACKENDS(7)