Sponsored Content
Operating Systems Solaris Difference between hard link and copy command Post 302378290 by jlliagre on Monday 7th of December 2009 12:50:59 PM
Old 12-07-2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by jim mcnamara
Links have consequences. One of them is that you do not ever want dangling links - links "aimed" at non-existent. It is possible to create a series: link -> link -> physical file. This is where it is easy to get in trouble. You can create circular links in some circumstances.
By design, you cannot have dangling links when dealing with hard-links. They can only exist in the context of symlinks.
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Differences between hard link and soft link

Hi all! I'd like to know the differences between hard links and soft links. I've already read the ln manpage, but i'm not quite sure of what i understood. Does a hard link sort of copy the file to a new name, give it the same inode number and same rights? What exactly should I do to do this:... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: penguin-friend
3 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Why use a hard link

Someone asked me a question today about the difference between a hard link and a soft link. That got me thinking and maybe someone can answer. Why would I ever use a hard link if I can use a soft link instead? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: dangral
2 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Difference between hard link and soft link in unix

Hi All, Can any one please explain me what is the difference between hard link and soft link in UNIX. Thanks in advance Raja Chokalingam. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: RAJACHOKALINGAM
2 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

need some info about symbolic link and hard link

hello folks how y'all doin well i have some questions about symbolic link and hard link hope some one answer me i open terminal and join as root and i wrote ln -s blah blah then i wrote ls i see red file called blah blah but didn't understand what is this can some one explain and... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: detective linux
2 Replies

5. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Hard link

Hello, In unix, the normal user can't create a hardlink for a directory. why..? Is there any difference between creating a hard link for a file and directory? The super user can create a hard link for directories. Why we cannot create and super user can create.? Please, can anyone help... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: nagalenoj
1 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Hard Link vs SOft Link????

Hi PLease let me know the usage of Hard Link vs Soft Link i.e what is the basic difference and what happens when one file is changed or deleted in both the cases??? thanks (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: skyineyes
3 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Difference between hard link and soft link

Hi Experts, Please help me out to find out difference between a hard link and a soft link. I am new in unix plz help me with some example commands ( for creating such links). Regards S.Kamakshi :) (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: kamakshi s
2 Replies

8. Shell Programming and Scripting

Find Hard Link

Goodmorning everybody. A question: How can i match if a file is an hard link or not? (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Guccio
6 Replies

9. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Hard Link Examples

Hello, Please move this if I chose the wrong forum category. This question pertains to Unix and Linux I believe. I google the difference between hard and symbolic/soft links and I understand the difference. What I am trying to find is a real example of a hard link being used in a Operating... (11 Replies)
Discussion started by: jaysunn
11 Replies

10. Solaris

difference between copy and mcopy command

Hi, Can anyone explain me the usage of mcopy command and also the difference between copy and mcopy. As per my understanding through both we can copy multiple files or DOS files . Any help on this will be really helpful. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: rogerben
3 Replies
SYMLINK(2)						     Linux Programmer's Manual							SYMLINK(2)

NAME
symlink - make a new name for a file SYNOPSIS
#include <unistd.h> int symlink(const char *oldpath, const char *newpath); Feature Test Macro Requirements for glibc (see feature_test_macros(7)): symlink(): _BSD_SOURCE || _XOPEN_SOURCE >= 500 || _POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 200112L DESCRIPTION
symlink() creates a symbolic link named newpath which contains the string oldpath. Symbolic links are interpreted at run time as if the contents of the link had been substituted into the path being followed to find a file or directory. Symbolic links may contain .. path components, which (if used at the start of the link) refer to the parent directories of that in which the link resides. A symbolic link (also known as a soft link) may point to an existing file or to a nonexistent one; the latter case is known as a dangling link. The permissions of a symbolic link are irrelevant; the ownership is ignored when following the link, but is checked when removal or renam- ing of the link is requested and the link is in a directory with the sticky bit (S_ISVTX) set. If newpath exists it will not be overwritten. RETURN VALUE
On success, zero is returned. On error, -1 is returned, and errno is set appropriately. ERRORS
EACCES Write access to the directory containing newpath is denied, or one of the directories in the path prefix of newpath did not allow search permission. (See also path_resolution(7).) EEXIST newpath already exists. EFAULT oldpath or newpath points outside your accessible address space. EIO An I/O error occurred. ELOOP Too many symbolic links were encountered in resolving newpath. ENAMETOOLONG oldpath or newpath was too long. ENOENT A directory component in newpath does not exist or is a dangling symbolic link, or oldpath is the empty string. ENOMEM Insufficient kernel memory was available. ENOSPC The device containing the file has no room for the new directory entry. ENOTDIR A component used as a directory in newpath is not, in fact, a directory. EPERM The file system containing newpath does not support the creation of symbolic links. EROFS newpath is on a read-only file system. CONFORMING TO
SVr4, 4.3BSD, POSIX.1-2001. NOTES
No checking of oldpath is done. Deleting the name referred to by a symlink will actually delete the file (unless it also has other hard links). If this behavior is not desired, use link(2). SEE ALSO
ln(1), lchown(2), link(2), lstat(2), open(2), readlink(2), rename(2), symlinkat(2), unlink(2), path_resolution(7), symlink(7) COLOPHON
This page is part of release 3.25 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, and information about reporting bugs, can be found at http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/. Linux 2007-07-26 SYMLINK(2)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:42 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy