Sponsored Content
The Lounge What is on Your Mind? Will You Get the A(H1N1) Vaccine? Post 302369173 by redhead on Friday 6th of November 2009 05:42:54 PM
Old 11-06-2009
I voted NO.

I do work within the viral industry, and would probably be within the high risk group, but I wouldn't take it, if it hits it'll hit, but if you'd take a look at the death toll on other flue dereviates you'd see a resemblance in numbers, the difference is this one is active within the younger population where previus outbreakes have been affecting the elderly and weak.

But why you might as.

I'll tell you why, eventho the vaccine (like anyother) is made from discarted bits of dead vira which should trigger your immune system but never cause you to get ill, and also has been weakened by adding murcury to eliminate any possible weakened/hlf dead vira. Theres still the long term exposure consequences, here I'm taking the side of the vira not the vaccined masses.

Allow me to explain, we've seen it in virtualy every hospital you can think of, when ever theres an infection you'd prescribe antibiotics, but lately theres an outbreak of bacterias which has become immune to the normal antibiotics.
But why bring bacterias into this you might ask, as they in no way resembles vira...
Allow me to deliver on that.

This flue was once a derivative of the swine flue, it evolved or devolved (depends on how you look at it) so that it also affected humans. And again I express the number of dead from this deriviate isn't much higher than the common flue.
Say what if we all get the vaccine, we all become immune to this flue (and as recent research has shown alot other deriviates to flue deceases) we've become unbeatable by the current level of the common flue at this stage, but in a few years the common flue will have evolved (and here I truely mean evolved) into an unbeatable flue which we have no means of protection against, then you'd realy see an epedemic, not this kind of media hype where a single death of a derivative from some flue (nothing at all like the birdflue) gives headlines in all the papers.

Not to be a party pooper, but at that stage I'm visualizing something like the plague, so call me a hypocrit but i'm not taking the vaccine due to the death rate at this point isn't much higher than the common flue season you'd see every year.
 
Clamd client(1) 						  Clam AntiVirus						   Clamd client(1)

NAME
clamdscan - scan files and directories for viruses using Clam AntiVirus Daemon SYNOPSIS
clamdscan [options] [file/directory] DESCRIPTION
clamdscan is a clamd client which may be used as a clamscan replacement. It accepts all the options implemented in clamscan but most of them will be ignored because its scanning abilities only depend on clamd. OPTIONS
-h, --help Display help information and exit. -V, --version Print version number and exit. -v, --verbose Be verbose. --quiet Be quiet - only output error messages. --stdout Write all messages (except for libclamav output) to the standard output (stdout). --config-file=FILE Read clamd settings from FILE. -l FILE, --log=FILE Save the scan report to FILE. -f FILE, --file-list=FILE Scan files listed line by line in FILE. -m, --multiscan In the multiscan mode clamd will attempt to scan the directory contents in parallel using available threads. This option is espe- cially useful on multiprocessor and multi-core systems. If you pass more than one file or directory in the command line, they are put in a queue and sent to clamd individually. This means, that single files are always scanned by a single thread. Similarly, clamdscan will wait for clamd to finish a directory scan (performed in multiscan mode) before sending request to scan another direc- tory. This option can be combined with --fdpass (see below). --remove Remove infected files. Be careful. --move=DIRECTORY Move infected files into DIRECTORY. --no-summary Do not display summary at the end of scanning. --reload Request clamd to reload virus database. --fdpass Pass the file descriptor permissions to clamd. This is useful if clamd is running as a different user as it is faster than streaming the file to clamd. Only available if connected to clamd via local(unix) socket. --stream Forces file streaming to clamd. This is generally not needed as clamdscan detects automatically if streaming is required. This option only exists for debugging and testing purposes, in all other cases --fdpass is preferred. EXAMPLES
(0) To scan a one file: clamdscan file (1) To scan a current working directory: clamdscan (2) To scan all files in /home: clamdscan /home (3) To scan a file when clamd is running as a different user: clamdscan --fdpass ~/downloads (4) To scan from standard input: clamdscan - <file_to_scan cat file_to_scan | clamdscan - RETURN CODES
0 : No virus found. 1 : Virus(es) found. 2 : An error occured. CREDITS
Please check the full documentation for credits. AUTHOR
Tomasz Kojm <tkojm@clamav.net> SEE ALSO
clamd(8), clamd.conf(5), clamscan(1) ClamAV 0.96.1 February 12, 2009 Clamd client(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:18 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy