10-07-2009
Since you don't tell us anything about your OS, your disklayout or anything else, we obviously have to guess, but in any case a copy from A to B that is slow is rather an IO issue than a cpu problem.
My best guess is, that both filesystems are maybe on the same disk and have maybe even different blocksizes. Since your filesystem was almost full, your fragmentation is very likely very high, since the OS had to put additional data where space were left, so typically the data was spread across the remaining diskspace and not nicely lined up like it would have been the case with lots of free space in the volumegroup. And I assume you haven't done a defragfs after cleaning up your diskspace.
When you now copy data from A to B and both locations are on the same disk, your system will take a lot more time to 1. find the data in the 'correct' order in filesystem A and read it - because its spread across the physical volume and 2. it will take a lot of time put the data back to disk in filesystem 'B' in the correct and suitable order - since the system has to find again free blocks big enough for your data chunks - and these chunks are likely as well spread across the entire disk.
Try to defrag your diskspace a few times, maybe that improves performance. If not, backup your data, drop the filesystems, defrag, recreate them and restore the content from backups.
Kind regards
zxmaus
9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators
Is the performance now very, very slow (pages take a very long time to load)? Or is it just me?
Neo (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Neo
6 Replies
2. Shell Programming and Scripting
We have an egrep search in a while loop.
egrep -w "$key" ${PICKUP_DIR}/new_update >> ${PICKUP_DIR}/update_record_new
${PICKUP_DIR}/new_update is 210 MB file
In each iteration, the egrep on an average takes around 50-60 seconds to search. Ther'es nothing significant in the loop other... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: hidnana
7 Replies
3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
hi guys
We are seeing weird issues on my Linux Suse 10, it has lotus 8.5
and 1 filesystem for OS and another for Lotus Database.
the issue is when the Lotus service starts wait on top is very high about 25% percent and in general CPU usage is very high
we found that when this happens if we... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: kopper
0 Replies
4. Solaris
Dear All,
I have a hard disk in solaris on which the write performanc is too slow.
The CPU , RAM memory are absolutely fine.
What might be reason.
Kindly explain.
Rj (9 Replies)
Discussion started by: jegaraman
9 Replies
5. Shell Programming and Scripting
Please, I need help tuning my script. It works but it's too slow.
The code reads an acivity log file with 50.000 - 100.000 lines and filters error messages from it. The data in the actlog file look similar to this:
02/08/2011 00:25:01,ANR2034E QUERY MOUNT: No match found using this criteria.... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: Miila
5 Replies
6. Infrastructure Monitoring
There is a big problem with the server (VPS based on OpenVZ, CentOS 5, 3GB RAM). The problem is the following. The first 15-20 minutes after starting the server is operating normally, the load average is less than or about 1.0, but then begins to increase sharply% wa, then hovers around 95-99%.... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: draiphod
2 Replies
7. Red Hat
My code
Hi All,
I am having redhat linux 5.3 (Tikanga) with GFS file system and its very very slow for executing ls -ls command also.Please see the below for 2minits 12 second takes.
Please help me to fix the issue.
$ sudo time ls -la BadFiles |wc -l
0.01user 0.26system... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: susindram
3 Replies
8. Solaris
I have identical M5000 machines that are needing to transfer very large amounts of data between them. These are fully loaded machines, and I've already checked IO, memory usage, etc... I get poor network performance even when the machines are idle or copying via loopback. The 10 GB NICs are... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: christr
7 Replies
9. Filesystems, Disks and Memory
I have a lot of binary files I need to copy to a folder. The folder is already filled with files of the same name. Copying on top of the old files takes MUCH longer than if I were to delete the old files then copy the new files to the now-empty folder. This result is specific to one system -... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: ces55
3 Replies
RMF(1) [nmh-1.5] RMF(1)
NAME
rmf - remove an nmh folder
SYNOPSIS
rmf [+folder] [-interactive | -nointeractive] [-version] [-help]
DESCRIPTION
Rmf removes all of the messages (files) within the specified (or default) folder, and then removes the folder (directory) itself.
If there are any files within the folder which are not a part of nmh, they will not be removed, and an error will be produced. If the
folder is given explicitly or the -nointeractive option is given, then the folder will be removed without confirmation. Otherwise, the
user will be asked for confirmation. If rmf can't find the current folder, for some reason, the folder to be removed defaults to `+inbox'
(unless overridden by user's profile entry "Inbox") with confirmation.
If the folder being removed is a subfolder, the parent folder will become the new current folder, and rmf will produce a message telling
the user this has happened. This provides an easy mechanism for selecting a set of messages, operating on the list, then removing the list
and returning to the current folder from which the list was extracted.
If rmf s used on a read-only folder, it will delete all the (private) sequences (i.e., "atr-seq-folder" entries) for this folder from your
context without affecting the folder itself.
Rmf irreversibly deletes messages that don't have other links, so use it with caution.
FILES
$HOME/.mh_profile The user profile
PROFILE COMPONENTS
Path: To determine the user's nmh directory
Current-Folder: To find the default current folder
Inbox: To find the default inbox
SEE ALSO
rmm(1)
DEFAULTS
`+folder' defaults to the current folder, usually with confirmation
`-interactive' if +folder' not given, `-nointeractive' otherwise
CONTEXT
Rmf will set the current folder to the parent folder if a subfolder is removed; or if the current folder is removed, it will make "inbox"
current. Otherwise, it doesn't change the current folder or message.
BUGS
Although intuitively one would suspect that rmf works recursively, it does not. Hence if you have a sub-folder within a folder, in order
to rmf the parent, you must first rmf each of the children.
MH.6.8 11 June 2012 RMF(1)