Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: pico vs vim
Top Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers pico vs vim Post 302340990 by drl on Tuesday 4th of August 2009 11:34:24 PM
Old 08-05-2009
Hi.

As a start, you can compare features for yourself of each editor (and many more) in the descriptive tables in Comparison of text editors - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ... cheers, drl
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

how do i install Pico onto a unix system?

I was just wondering how to install Pioc onto FreeBSD? could someone help mee? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Swifty
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Setting up pine(pico)

I'm trying to setup the pico editor, which comes with pine. But I am not sure how to activate pine. I'm using the newest stable version of openbsd. If someone could tell me what file to execute, or, if not 'onboard' the package, where to get it. I would be much obliged. Req (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Requeth
1 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

vi and pico

hello iam so new to unix / apache what is the dif between VI and PICO where can i get hands on training with both in Los Angeles any ideas would be helpfull. thanx whothought (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: whothought
5 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

pico text editor

I was wondering if there is any way to get a version of pico for windows. I have done a lot of programming work on Linux/UNIX exvironments for school, and I enjoy using pico for my programming needs, but I find all of the text editors in windows horrible, they distort my code and do not adhere to... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: popac
5 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

question about pico?

Quick question for all of you Unix gurus. What are your thoughts on Pico as an editor. I have been using this editor for the last week or so and have made a lot of headway with my script writing. However, I find a lot of the quirks associated with this editor to be quite annoying. For instance,... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: wmosley2
1 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Pico?

Is pico editor not availible on all versions of Unix? I do have vi and emacs, but pico just give me a response of "not found". (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: dereckbc
4 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Can't run emacs, pico..

Hello, I cannot run emacs or pico from my Sun OS command shell. My account does not have a .cshrc file also. When I tried to make a text file and copied it to my account by the name .cshrc, the source commands I place in it do not work. Can anybody tell me how can I solve this? Any help... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: aryajur
8 Replies

8. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Lost pico editor

I del a lot of files,after that I can't find pico. I have to use vi. However, I like pico. Can should I do ? (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: zhshqzyc
4 Replies

9. Solaris

Very Importan - Vim Settings - Error while opening a File using vim

I downloaded vim.7.2 and compiled the vim source . Added the vim binary path to PATH (Because iam not the root of the box) when i load the file using vim it throws me an error Error detected while processing /home2/e3003091/.vimrc: line 2: E185: Cannot find color scheme darkblue line... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: girija
0 Replies

10. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Ed vs pico

Hello! Please, can someone make me clear the difference betveen and interactive and non-interactive test editor? (is not each editor somehow "interactive"???) Many thanks!!! (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: pinklemon
0 Replies
URI::URL(3)						User Contributed Perl Documentation					       URI::URL(3)

NAME
URI::URL - Uniform Resource Locators SYNOPSIS
$u1 = URI::URL->new($str, $base); $u2 = $u1->abs; DESCRIPTION
This module is provided for backwards compatibility with modules that depend on the interface provided by the "URI::URL" class that used to be distributed with the libwww-perl library. The following differences exist compared to the "URI" class interface: o The URI::URL module exports the url() function as an alternate constructor interface. o The constructor takes an optional $base argument. The "URI::URL" class is a subclass of "URI::WithBase". o The URI::URL->newlocal class method is the same as URI::file->new_abs. o URI::URL::strict(1) o $url->print_on method o $url->crack method o $url->full_path: same as ($uri->abs_path || "/") o $url->netloc: same as $uri->authority o $url->epath, $url->equery: same as $uri->path, $uri->query o $url->path and $url->query pass unescaped strings. o $url->path_components: same as $uri->path_segments (if you don't consider path segment parameters) o $url->params and $url->eparams methods o $url->base method. See URI::WithBase. o $url->abs and $url->rel have an optional $base argument. See URI::WithBase. o $url->frag: same as $uri->fragment o $url->keywords: same as $uri->query_keywords o $url->localpath and friends map to $uri->file. o $url->address and $url->encoded822addr: same as $uri->to for mailto URI o $url->groupart method for news URI o $url->article: same as $uri->message SEE ALSO
URI, URI::WithBase COPYRIGHT
Copyright 1998-2000 Gisle Aas. perl v5.12.5 2011-08-13 URI::URL(3)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:59 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy