|
|
Sponsored Content
Operating Systems
Solaris
Solaris 10 v245 Busy/Slow System
Post 302338527 by Wez on Tuesday 28th of July 2009 08:02:59 AM
07-28-2009
Thanks for the reply, the server has been up for 13 days so not very long.
Its currently running Solaris 10 with the recommended updates, here is the showrev output.
The server uses very little CPU as most of our application work is done in memory. The server has 8GB of physical memory and approx 8GB swap available.
---------- Post updated at 01:02 PM ---------- Previous update was at 12:18 PM ----------
Here is the output from "prstat -s size -n 50", it looks like each oracle process is eating memory
Quote:
11:56am up 13 day(s), 11:35, 4 users, load average: 0.77, 0.72, 0.77
Quote:
Hostname: **********
Hostid: **********
Release: 5.10
Kernel architecture: sun4u
Application architecture: sparc
Hardware provider: Sun_Microsystems
Domain:
Kernel version: SunOS 5.10 Generic_118833-36
Hostid: **********
Release: 5.10
Kernel architecture: sun4u
Application architecture: sparc
Hardware provider: Sun_Microsystems
Domain:
Kernel version: SunOS 5.10 Generic_118833-36
Quote:
NPROC USERNAME SIZE RSS MEMORY TIME CPU
462 blahblah 176G 169G 85% 88:35:59 13%
19 oracle 29G 29G 15% 4:10:03 0.9%
41 root 396M 124M 0.1% 3:15:24 0.5%
1 noaccess 193M 82M 0.0% 0:18:31 0.0%
1 smmsp 7632K 2016K 0.0% 0:00:01 0.0%
6 daemon 20M 11M 0.0% 0:00:02 0.0%
462 blahblah 176G 169G 85% 88:35:59 13%
19 oracle 29G 29G 15% 4:10:03 0.9%
41 root 396M 124M 0.1% 3:15:24 0.5%
1 noaccess 193M 82M 0.0% 0:18:31 0.0%
1 smmsp 7632K 2016K 0.0% 0:00:01 0.0%
6 daemon 20M 11M 0.0% 0:00:02 0.0%
---------- Post updated at 01:02 PM ---------- Previous update was at 12:18 PM ----------
Here is the output from "prstat -s size -n 50", it looks like each oracle process is eating memory
Quote:
PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU PROCESS/NLWP
1819 oracle 1678M 1642M sleep 59 0 2:14:28 0.3% oracle/14
1817 oracle 1673M 1648M sleep 59 0 0:08:45 0.0% oracle/258
1821 oracle 1668M 1642M sleep 59 0 0:07:38 0.0% oracle/15
1830 oracle 1667M 1648M sleep 59 0 0:03:03 0.0% oracle/1
1827 oracle 1667M 1643M sleep 59 0 0:17:03 0.0% oracle/1
1823 oracle 1667M 1643M sleep 59 0 0:01:25 0.0% oracle/1
1970 oracle 1666M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:02:49 0.0% oracle/1
1911 oracle 1666M 1647M sleep 59 0 0:00:20 0.0% oracle/1
3429 oracle 1666M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:43:20 0.1% oracle/1
2940 oracle 1666M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:00:41 0.0% oracle/1
3402 oracle 1666M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:00:58 0.0% oracle/1
1984 oracle 1666M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:12:37 0.1% oracle/1
1976 oracle 1666M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:09:39 0.0% oracle/1
1972 oracle 1666M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:11:04 0.0% oracle/1
1811 oracle 1666M 1642M sleep 59 0 0:14:16 0.0% oracle/1
1996 oracle 1666M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:05:43 0.0% oracle/1
1992 oracle 1666M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:09:57 0.0% oracle/1
25583 oracle 1666M 1648M sleep 59 0 0:00:03 0.0% oracle/1
1962 oracle 1666M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:06:13 0.0% oracle/1
1966 oracle 1666M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:00:26 0.2% oracle/1
2012 oracle 1666M 1642M sleep 59 0 0:00:08 0.0% oracle/1
1836 oracle 1666M 1640M sleep 59 0 0:00:03 0.0% oracle/1
2780 oracle 1666M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:00:43 0.0% oracle/1
17214 oracle 1666M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:01:36 0.0% oracle/1
1974 oracle 1666M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:11:19 0.0% oracle/1
3609 oracle 1666M 1643M sleep 59 0 0:00:00 0.3% oracle/1
4533 oracle 1666M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:05:43 0.0% oracle/1
2916 oracle 1666M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:01:30 0.0% oracle/1
20923 oracle 1666M 1644M sleep 59 0 0:00:00 0.0% oracle/1
1954 oracle 1666M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:06:49 0.0% oracle/1
2886 oracle 1666M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:03:45 0.0% oracle/1
1834 oracle 1666M 1636M sleep 59 0 0:00:01 0.0% oracle/1
1988 oracle 1665M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:07:16 0.0% oracle/1
1986 oracle 1665M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:06:20 0.0% oracle/1
1980 oracle 1665M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:08:47 0.0% oracle/1
1978 oracle 1665M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:11:27 0.0% oracle/1
1968 oracle 1665M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:03:45 0.0% oracle/1
1964 oracle 1665M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:04:39 0.1% oracle/1
1960 oracle 1665M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:08:03 0.0% oracle/1
1958 oracle 1665M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:03:53 0.0% oracle/1
3421 oracle 1665M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:06:24 0.0% oracle/1
2910 oracle 1665M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:01:17 0.0% oracle/1
2892 oracle 1665M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:03:40 0.0% oracle/1
1994 oracle 1665M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:10:50 0.0% oracle/1
1982 oracle 1665M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:06:14 0.0% oracle/1
14376 oracle 1665M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:07:52 0.0% oracle/1
1990 oracle 1665M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:06:27 0.0% oracle/1
1956 oracle 1665M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:03:02 0.0% oracle/1
3906 oracle 1665M 1644M sleep 59 0 0:00:08 0.0% oracle/1
754 oracle 1665M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:01:41 0.0% oracle/1
Total: 529 processes, 2429 lwps, load averages: 0.61, 0.70, 0.77
1819 oracle 1678M 1642M sleep 59 0 2:14:28 0.3% oracle/14
1817 oracle 1673M 1648M sleep 59 0 0:08:45 0.0% oracle/258
1821 oracle 1668M 1642M sleep 59 0 0:07:38 0.0% oracle/15
1830 oracle 1667M 1648M sleep 59 0 0:03:03 0.0% oracle/1
1827 oracle 1667M 1643M sleep 59 0 0:17:03 0.0% oracle/1
1823 oracle 1667M 1643M sleep 59 0 0:01:25 0.0% oracle/1
1970 oracle 1666M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:02:49 0.0% oracle/1
1911 oracle 1666M 1647M sleep 59 0 0:00:20 0.0% oracle/1
3429 oracle 1666M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:43:20 0.1% oracle/1
2940 oracle 1666M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:00:41 0.0% oracle/1
3402 oracle 1666M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:00:58 0.0% oracle/1
1984 oracle 1666M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:12:37 0.1% oracle/1
1976 oracle 1666M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:09:39 0.0% oracle/1
1972 oracle 1666M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:11:04 0.0% oracle/1
1811 oracle 1666M 1642M sleep 59 0 0:14:16 0.0% oracle/1
1996 oracle 1666M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:05:43 0.0% oracle/1
1992 oracle 1666M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:09:57 0.0% oracle/1
25583 oracle 1666M 1648M sleep 59 0 0:00:03 0.0% oracle/1
1962 oracle 1666M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:06:13 0.0% oracle/1
1966 oracle 1666M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:00:26 0.2% oracle/1
2012 oracle 1666M 1642M sleep 59 0 0:00:08 0.0% oracle/1
1836 oracle 1666M 1640M sleep 59 0 0:00:03 0.0% oracle/1
2780 oracle 1666M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:00:43 0.0% oracle/1
17214 oracle 1666M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:01:36 0.0% oracle/1
1974 oracle 1666M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:11:19 0.0% oracle/1
3609 oracle 1666M 1643M sleep 59 0 0:00:00 0.3% oracle/1
4533 oracle 1666M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:05:43 0.0% oracle/1
2916 oracle 1666M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:01:30 0.0% oracle/1
20923 oracle 1666M 1644M sleep 59 0 0:00:00 0.0% oracle/1
1954 oracle 1666M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:06:49 0.0% oracle/1
2886 oracle 1666M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:03:45 0.0% oracle/1
1834 oracle 1666M 1636M sleep 59 0 0:00:01 0.0% oracle/1
1988 oracle 1665M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:07:16 0.0% oracle/1
1986 oracle 1665M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:06:20 0.0% oracle/1
1980 oracle 1665M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:08:47 0.0% oracle/1
1978 oracle 1665M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:11:27 0.0% oracle/1
1968 oracle 1665M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:03:45 0.0% oracle/1
1964 oracle 1665M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:04:39 0.1% oracle/1
1960 oracle 1665M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:08:03 0.0% oracle/1
1958 oracle 1665M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:03:53 0.0% oracle/1
3421 oracle 1665M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:06:24 0.0% oracle/1
2910 oracle 1665M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:01:17 0.0% oracle/1
2892 oracle 1665M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:03:40 0.0% oracle/1
1994 oracle 1665M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:10:50 0.0% oracle/1
1982 oracle 1665M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:06:14 0.0% oracle/1
14376 oracle 1665M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:07:52 0.0% oracle/1
1990 oracle 1665M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:06:27 0.0% oracle/1
1956 oracle 1665M 1646M sleep 59 0 0:03:02 0.0% oracle/1
3906 oracle 1665M 1644M sleep 59 0 0:00:08 0.0% oracle/1
754 oracle 1665M 1645M sleep 59 0 0:01:41 0.0% oracle/1
Total: 529 processes, 2429 lwps, load averages: 0.61, 0.70, 0.77
|
|
9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hi,
I have an SCO-Unix server running.
There are some processes (unknown to me) which consume a lot of the system resources. This slows down the server dramatically.
Is there a command or program that monitors what processes are using the cpu, disk, etc.. and tell me how excessive and how... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Hansaplast
3 Replies
2. HP-UX
I am running HPUX 11.0 with HP MirrorDisk/UX and recently had a HDD failure and replaced the drive with a new one. I did a "dd" command to copy the new data to the new drive and now I have a bunch of "lvmkd" in my "ps -ef" output. These processes are gobbling up CPU time and slowing my system... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: jpetrecca
2 Replies
3. Solaris
Hello ,
I am connecting sumfire v245 server to my laptop Through ALOM method.i got the ALOM prompt but after that i am typing sc> console to go to system console but i am not able to,after typing console only this line is coming Type #. to go back to ALOM.
What to do ??
That server having... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: avi157
5 Replies
4. Solaris
Hey all.
Wondering - I have a pair of V245's with no internal CD/DVD-ROM drives, and I want to install the latest/greatest Solaris 10.
Booting these machines with an external drive plugged in via USB does no good.
Is jumpstart or installing internal drives the only alternative?
I'm a... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: b1f30
1 Replies
5. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hi,
We have a filesystem mystery on our hands. Given:
2 machines, A and Aa.
Machine Aa is the problem machine.
Machine A is running Ubuntu, kernel 2.6.22.9 #1 SMP Wed Feb 20 08:46:16 CST 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux. Machine Aa is running RHEL5.3, kernel 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 SMP Wed Dec 17 11:41:38... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: mschwage
2 Replies
6. Solaris
Hi Experts,
I was asked to find most busy file system on one of the server. It is Sun 10. Any idea to get this?
Thanks,
Deepak (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: naw_deepak
5 Replies
7. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Friends
Greetings. I have a RedHat 5.7 64bit virtual server on VMware ESXi 4.1. This server and other Redhat Servers are running very slow. I did some stats collection on ESXi and looks like Linux is holding the disk IO. I am not sure what is causing this behavior.
On Linux I checked the CPU... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: sdewal
4 Replies
8. Red Hat
My code
Hi All,
I am having redhat linux 5.3 (Tikanga) with GFS file system and its very very slow for executing ls -ls command also.Please see the below for 2minits 12 second takes.
Please help me to fix the issue.
$ sudo time ls -la BadFiles |wc -l
0.01user 0.26system... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: susindram
3 Replies
9. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hi, what would be the first things to check on a system that normally works fine, and is not so fine this morning ? Its accessing menus and various other screens 100x slower than normal.
Version: UnixWare 5 7.1.3 i386 SCO UNIX_SVR5
I have tried this pf -ef|grep paulc and found a huge list of... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Mick_Dundee
6 Replies