07-22-2009
Thank you.
Thanks for the reply. Much appreciate it.
Wished Linux programmers considered something like this to echo all GUI interactions as commands.
We would have had a better solution for automation in Linux than inventing newbie friendly equivalents for "Applescript" or "Automator" like on Macs.
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. IP Networking
Firstly I must apologise; I have posted something similar in the "general UNIX newbies" forum; but in reterospect I think that it's more appropriate here.
Anyhoo;
I am trying to detect whether people accessing one of my servers are coming via a proxied connection. I must add that this is... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sam_pointer
1 Replies
2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
This is quite a general question:
I am trying to detect whether people accessing my network are using a proxy server. This is *not* to ensure that web pages are not cached!
The only way that I can think of doing this is to intercept at packet level and examine the source port for... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sam_pointer
1 Replies
3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Hi, I've been racking my brains trying to remember, but, whats the command to change the default shell? I'm currently always in the Korn shell and I want to start out in the Bash shell. I'm running a variant of BSD I guess in Mac OS X 10.2.2 and Mandrake. Thanks.
ccindyderek:confused: (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: ccindyderek
4 Replies
4. Shell Programming and Scripting
Perl, Python, and PHP are these languages easy to use? Are they command line or are they part of a GUI? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: wmosley2
2 Replies
5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
This may be a dumb question (but this is the UNIX for Dummies Q&A forum :)
But I'm wondering, what is the purpose of a directory being given execute permissions? I can't execute a directory, only files, right? If I make a directory executable, the files inside still won't execute unless I give... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: FredSmith
1 Replies
6. Solaris
Dears,
my question
is that possible to configure any server to work in solaris zone
i mean any server
cos i read that DHCP can't be work on solaris zone
is that real or not
Best Regards
Alexander Corvinus (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: corvinusbsd
4 Replies
7. Linux
I am looking for an alternate solution other than gzip or bzip2 to compress files that are 3 to 4 GB each and will be hundreds per day. Aside from increasing storage anybody found a good tool? (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: mykey242
5 Replies
8. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
How is the level of access on a particular folder determined? I have heard (its just hearsay so am not particularly sure of it) that the access a particular user/group has to a low level directory is also affected by the level of access granted to the user/group on its parent directories. e.g.
... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jawsnnn
1 Replies
9. Shell Programming and Scripting
So this is something I've been wondering how to do for a while. Suppose I have two shell scripts a.sh and b.sh
script a does some function and outputs to a varable $x . I would then like to take $x into the second function, b.sh, and do a function on it and create some output. So how do you pass... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: viored
3 Replies
10. Programming
I am planning on taking a class in Python. My choices are 2.5 or 3.0. Which version should I choose? I am getting the impression they are two separate paths.
thanks. (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: djehresmann
5 Replies
LEARN ABOUT DEBIAN
xpacmdnew
xpacmdnew(3) SAORD Documentation xpacmdnew(3)
NAME
XPACmdNew - create a new XPA public access point for commands
SYNOPSIS
#include <xpa.h>
XPA XPACmdNew(char *class, char *name);
DESCRIPTION
Create a new XPA public access point for commands that will share a common identifier class:name. Enter this access point into the XPA name
server, so that it can be accessed by external processes. XPACmdNew() returns an XPA struct.
It often is more convenient to have one public access point that can manage a number of commands, rather than having individual access
points for each command. For example, it is easier to command the ds9 image display using:
echo "colormap I8" | xpaset ds9
echo "scale log" | xpaset ds9
echo "file foo.fits" | xpaset ds9
then to use:
echo "I8" | xpaset ds9_colormap
echo "log" | xpaset ds9_scale
echo "foo.fits" | xpaset ds9_file
In the first case, the commands remain the same regardless of the target XPA name. In the second case, the command names must change for
each instance of ds9. That is, if a second instance of ds9 called DS9 were running, it would be commanded either as:
echo "colormap I8" | xpaset DS9
echo "scale log" | xpaset DS9
echo "file foo.fits" | xpaset DS9
or as:
echo "I8" | xpaset DS9_colormap
echo "log" | xpaset DS9_scale
echo "foo.fits" | xpaset DS9_file
Thus, in cases where a program is going to manage many commands, it generally is easier to define them as commands associated with the
XPACmdNew() routine, rather than as separate access points using XPANew().
When XPACmdNew() is called, only the class:name identifier is specified. Each sub-command is subsequently defined using the XPACmdAdd()
routine.
SEE ALSO
See xpa(7) for a list of XPA help pages
version 2.1.14 June 7, 2012 xpacmdnew(3)