Sponsored Content
Top Forums Programming Why am I getting a defunct process/pipes? Post 302333196 by p00ndawg on Saturday 11th of July 2009 02:19:20 PM
Old 07-11-2009
Why am I getting a defunct process/pipes?

Code:
#include <stdio.h> 
#include <stdlib.h> 
#include <unistd.h> 
#include <fcntl.h> 
#include <string.h> 
#include <sys/wait.h> 
#include <sys/types.h> 
#include <stdint.h> 
 
#define LINE_MAX     80 
 
 
int main() 
{ 
pid_t pid, pid1; 
char line[LINE_MAX]; 
char *lines[LINE_MAX]; 
char *key, *data, *starter, *ender; 
int status; 
char word[] = "cd"; 
int i, j; 
char tmp;
int count = LINE_MAX;
int count1 = tmp; 
 
 
while(1){ 
 
 
printf("3600 Shell $ "); 
fflush(stdout); 
fgets(line, LINE_MAX, stdin); 
 
 
for(i = 0; i < LINE_MAX; i++) 
{ 
    if(line[i] == '|') 
    {             
        tmp = line[i];
        for(tmp; i < line[i]; i--)
        {
            key = strtok(line, "    \n"); 
            data = strtok(NULL, "   \n");
            //printf("HI");
        }
        for(tmp; LINE_MAX > line[i]; i++)
        { 
            starter = strtok(line, "    \n"); 
            ender = strtok(NULL, "   \n");
            //printf("HI");
        } 
    }
    else         
        key = strtok(line, "    \n"); 
        data = strtok(NULL, "   \n"); 
} 
 
char *args[] = {key, data}; 
char *argv[] = {starter, ender}; 
char *directory = data; 
int pipes[4];
pipe(pipes);
pipe(pipes + 2); 
 
if ((pid = fork()) < 0) 
    {     
        perror("Fork Failed"); 
    } 
 
     if(pid == 0) 
        { 
        if(strcmp(word, line) == 0) 
            {  
                pid = 1; 
            }
                 
            if(pid1 = fork() == 0) 
            { 
                dup2(pipes[0],0);
                dup2(pipes[3],1); 
                close(pipes[0]);
                      close(pipes[1]);
                      close(pipes[2]);
                      close(pipes[3]);
                execvp(*argv, argv);     
            } 
                else    { 
                        dup2(pipes[2],0); 
                        close(pipes[0]);
                              close(pipes[1]);
                              close(pipes[2]);
                              close(pipes[3]); 
                        execvp(*args, args); 
                    } 
             
                dup2(pipes[1],1); 
                close(pipes[0]);
                      close(pipes[1]);
                      close(pipes[2]);
                      close(pipes[3]); 
                execvp(*args, args); 
                exit(1); 
        } 
     
else 
{    chdir(directory);
    close(pipes[0]);
      close(pipes[1]);
      close(pipes[2]);
      close(pipes[3]);
 
    while(wait(&status) != pid);
 
             
} 
 
}//end while 
}//end main

im trying to get the pipe command working in this code.

so something like "ls | wc file" would work, im having lots of trouble doing this with dup2 tho, im actually required to use dup2 for this assignment.

Nothing ive tried has really worked. In the first for loop, im trying to split the line from the '|' mark so that the arguments from one side of the pipe are taken and split from the arguments of the other side so I can pipe the output from the left to right. (not sure if this algorithm is correct tho)

it just really isnt working.
I dont want anyone to do this assingment for me, I just need some help to pinpoint where im going wrong because it compiles perfectly fine with no errors so at the very least I know my syntax is correct.

Last edited by p00ndawg; 07-11-2009 at 07:55 PM..
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. SCO

defunct process due to scohttp on SCO5.0.5

Hello , I've got 2 defunct processes due to scohttp process : # ps -ef | grep 460 root 460 1 0 Sep-21 ? 00:00:00 /var/scohttp/scohttpd -d /var/scohttp root 15399 15228 2 09:06:23 ttyp1 00:00:00 grep 460 nouser 14600 460 0 - - 00:00:00... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: npn35
0 Replies

2. Programming

defunct process!!

how can i assure that daemon process which is being run as init child,can be removed immediately from system when it goes defunct or to avoid daemon process becoming defunt? (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: rish2005
5 Replies

3. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

defunct process on HP

Hi unix lovers, i have question about defunt process on HP-UX. Are there any side-effects of defunct process? Can a parent process get killed because there are lot of defunct processes? say 50 defunct childs?? -Ashish (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: shriashishpatil
1 Replies

4. Programming

Defunct Process Problem

Hi! I'm newbi in the Unix. I've a C++ Program from where one shell gets executed. Sample C++ code is -- transactionID = 1199; case 1199: //************************************************* // Received the suspend signal.... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: satyakide
2 Replies

5. Solaris

Defunct process

My system is running solaris zones and oracle dbs in all the zones .. and now i find more then 4500 defunct processes in ps output. Can anyone know about this how to kill these # ps -ef | grep defunct | wc -l 4899 And when i do ptree on one of the pid it shows most of the defunct... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: fugitive
3 Replies

6. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

defunct process occuring in a particular program

All, I am getting a wired scenario, Not all times but some times i am getting the defunct process for a program. If i rerun the same program it is working fine.This defunct scenario is not occuring often. And this is happening only for the one program in my system that to sometimes Can you... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: arunkumar_mca
1 Replies

7. Programming

IPC - pipes between parent and child process

Hi guys, I'm having some problem here, I'm studying pipes, and i want to create a shell in C and at this point a don't want to use semaphores, instead I want to use tricks. Straight to the doubt: I've a parent and a child process, and both of them has some code to execute, and the child process... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: pharaoh
5 Replies

8. AIX

Defunct process with dtlogin

Hi, I tried to kill the defunct process but it didn't work. I don't want to make a mistake because some people are working on the server. I don't know if they might have troubles without dtlogin. I would like stop/start dtlogin to stop the defunct process Do you think that works?... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: Castelior
6 Replies

9. HP-UX

Defunct Processes; Maximum Process

I'd like to remove this defunct processes without rebooting. Or, I could remove this defuncts when the maximum allowable process is nearly reached, then send an email to the user/team. How can I determine the maximum allowable process that a server can handle? Any thoughts? Jin@PRODUCTION: >... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: Jin_
3 Replies

10. Solaris

Defunct process are generated after JNLP connection with a slave and the machine gets very slow

Hi everyone, I'm working on continous integration with Jenkins. I’m facing an issue while connecting a slave (solaris sparc 8) with Jenkins ver. 1.532.2 This slave is connected via the option “Launch slave via execution of command on the Master”. Connection is established with: -... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: javaPIC
1 Replies
PIPE(7) 						     Linux Programmer's Manual							   PIPE(7)

NAME
pipe - overview of pipes and FIFOs DESCRIPTION
Pipes and FIFOs (also known as named pipes) provide a unidirectional interprocess communication channel. A pipe has a read end and a write end. Data written to the write end of a pipe can be read from the read end of the pipe. A pipe is created using pipe(2), which creates a new pipe and returns two file descriptors, one referring to the read end of the pipe, the other referring to the write end. Pipes can be used to create a communication channel between related processes; see pipe(2) for an exam- ple. A FIFO (short for First In First Out) has a name within the file system (created using mkfifo(3)), and is opened using open(2). Any process may open a FIFO, assuming the file permissions allow it. The read end is opened using the O_RDONLY flag; the write end is opened using the O_WRONLY flag. See fifo(7) for further details. Note: although FIFOs have a pathname in the file system, I/O on FIFOs does not involve operations on the underlying device (if there is one). I/O on Pipes and FIFOs The only difference between pipes and FIFOs is the manner in which they are created and opened. Once these tasks have been accomplished, I/O on pipes and FIFOs has exactly the same semantics. If a process attempts to read from an empty pipe, then read(2) will block until data is available. If a process attempts to write to a full pipe (see below), then write(2) blocks until sufficient data has been read from the pipe to allow the write to complete. Nonblocking I/O is possible by using the fcntl(2) F_SETFL operation to enable the O_NONBLOCK open file status flag. The communication channel provided by a pipe is a byte stream: there is no concept of message boundaries. If all file descriptors referring to the write end of a pipe have been closed, then an attempt to read(2) from the pipe will see end-of- file (read(2) will return 0). If all file descriptors referring to the read end of a pipe have been closed, then a write(2) will cause a SIGPIPE signal to be generated for the calling process. If the calling process is ignoring this signal, then write(2) fails with the error EPIPE. An application that uses pipe(2) and fork(2) should use suitable close(2) calls to close unnecessary duplicate file descriptors; this ensures that end-of-file and SIGPIPE/EPIPE are delivered when appropriate. It is not possible to apply lseek(2) to a pipe. Pipe Capacity A pipe has a limited capacity. If the pipe is full, then a write(2) will block or fail, depending on whether the O_NONBLOCK flag is set (see below). Different implementations have different limits for the pipe capacity. Applications should not rely on a particular capac- ity: an application should be designed so that a reading process consumes data as soon as it is available, so that a writing process does not remain blocked. In Linux versions before 2.6.11, the capacity of a pipe was the same as the system page size (e.g., 4096 bytes on i386). Since Linux 2.6.11, the pipe capacity is 65536 bytes. PIPE_BUF POSIX.1-2001 says that write(2)s of less than PIPE_BUF bytes must be atomic: the output data is written to the pipe as a contiguous sequence. Writes of more than PIPE_BUF bytes may be nonatomic: the kernel may interleave the data with data written by other processes. POSIX.1-2001 requires PIPE_BUF to be at least 512 bytes. (On Linux, PIPE_BUF is 4096 bytes.) The precise semantics depend on whether the file descriptor is nonblocking (O_NONBLOCK), whether there are multiple writers to the pipe, and on n, the number of bytes to be written: O_NONBLOCK disabled, n <= PIPE_BUF All n bytes are written atomically; write(2) may block if there is not room for n bytes to be written immediately O_NONBLOCK enabled, n <= PIPE_BUF If there is room to write n bytes to the pipe, then write(2) succeeds immediately, writing all n bytes; otherwise write(2) fails, with errno set to EAGAIN. O_NONBLOCK disabled, n > PIPE_BUF The write is nonatomic: the data given to write(2) may be interleaved with write(2)s by other process; the write(2) blocks until n bytes have been written. O_NONBLOCK enabled, n > PIPE_BUF If the pipe is full, then write(2) fails, with errno set to EAGAIN. Otherwise, from 1 to n bytes may be written (i.e., a "partial write" may occur; the caller should check the return value from write(2) to see how many bytes were actually written), and these bytes may be interleaved with writes by other processes. Open File Status Flags The only open file status flags that can be meaningfully applied to a pipe or FIFO are O_NONBLOCK and O_ASYNC. Setting the O_ASYNC flag for the read end of a pipe causes a signal (SIGIO by default) to be generated when new input becomes available on the pipe (see fcntl(2) for details). On Linux, O_ASYNC is supported for pipes and FIFOs only since kernel 2.6. Portability notes On some systems (but not Linux), pipes are bidirectional: data can be transmitted in both directions between the pipe ends. According to POSIX.1-2001, pipes only need to be unidirectional. Portable applications should avoid reliance on bidirectional pipe semantics. SEE ALSO
dup(2), fcntl(2), open(2), pipe(2), poll(2), select(2), socketpair(2), stat(2), mkfifo(3), epoll(7), fifo(7) COLOPHON
This page is part of release 3.25 of the Linux man-pages project. A description of the project, and information about reporting bugs, can be found at http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/. Linux 2005-12-08 PIPE(7)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:35 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy