Sponsored Content
The Lounge What is on Your Mind? What's this Bits and Banking? Post 302328609 by arunsoman80 on Wednesday 24th of June 2009 06:10:54 PM
Old 06-24-2009
Question What's this Bits and Banking?

Hey Guys,

This is a lame one... Today I noticed this link 'Banking' next to my user name and when I click on it, it shows some bits, some checking/saving account and all...

Just curious on how does one earn this bits and all??? Was really surprised to see around 19K bits with me... I did notice that one can use it to play games and all, which is sort of cool... Smilie

regards,
Arun.
 

7 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Changing 24 bits to 8 bits display

Hello all, I was wondering if anyone can tell me how to change 24 bits depth display to 8 bits depth display for Sun Ultra1, running Solaris 8? THANKS in advance. I think that the command is ffbconfig, but it has nothing about depth. (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: larry
4 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Unix in the banking world

Hi I have recently joined a bank as a tester. Initially I will be working on some test scripts and then I will be testing their data warehouse using SQL and Unix. I do have a very basic knowledge and understanding of both unix and sql. I am not sure how I will be using Unix to test their ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: kartikkumar84@g
2 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

32 bits procesaor with 64 bits Solaris

people i have a problem i have a 32 bits sparc processor, and solaris 64 bits processor, i install a oracle data base 64 bits, but my oracle will not run because my processor is from 32 bits this is ok??, i know if i have x86 i cannot install a 64 bits operatin system in a 32 bits processor. ... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: enkei17
0 Replies

4. Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators

How can i stop displaying Bits/banking with my account?

How can i stop displaying Bits/banking with my account? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: cola
1 Replies

5. Cybersecurity

Dedicate browser for secure online banking?

I currently keep a hosts file to make my online banking more secure. But that won’t help in the event of a DNS-cache-poisoning zero-day attack. Is the following solution practical? Dedicate one browser for secure online banking, and dedicate a different browser for normal browsing of the... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: wolfv
4 Replies

6. What is on Your Mind?

Place Bits & Win Bits!!! - 17th Annual Satellite Awards

Ten movies have been nominated as best motion picture by the International Press Academy, presentation of the 2012 Satellite Awards will be held on 16th December at Los Angeles, CA. Place your bits here on one of the below nominated movie of your choice:- Argo ... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Yoda
0 Replies

7. What is on Your Mind?

Banking Bits...

(Consider me stupid here.) I am new to this technique, but, I notice that my banking bits keep increasing by the day. After some further research on here I understand why they are used... ;o) What I don't understand is why mine are increasing by the day... Can someone either point me to... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: wisecracker
4 Replies
BITMAP_ONTO(9)						  Basic Kernel Library Functions					    BITMAP_ONTO(9)

NAME
bitmap_onto - translate one bitmap relative to another SYNOPSIS
void bitmap_onto(unsigned long * dst, const unsigned long * orig, const unsigned long * relmap, int bits); ARGUMENTS
dst resulting translated bitmap orig original untranslated bitmap relmap bitmap relative to which translated bits number of bits in each of these bitmaps DESCRIPTION
Set the n-th bit of dst iff there exists some m such that the n-th bit of relmap is set, the m-th bit of orig is set, and the n-th bit of relmap is also the m-th _set_ bit of relmap. (If you understood the previous sentence the first time your read it, you're overqualified for your current job.) In other words, orig is mapped onto (surjectively) dst, using the the map { <n, m> | the n-th bit of relmap is the m-th set bit of relmap }. Any set bits in orig above bit number W, where W is the weight of (number of set bits in) relmap are mapped nowhere. In particular, if for all bits m set in orig, m >= W, then dst will end up empty. In situations where the possibility of such an empty result is not desired, one way to avoid it is to use the bitmap_fold operator, below, to first fold the orig bitmap over itself so that all its set bits x are in the range 0 <= x < W. The bitmap_fold operator does this by setting the bit (m % W) in dst, for each bit (m) set in orig. Example [1] for bitmap_onto: Let's say relmap has bits 30-39 set, and orig has bits 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 set. Then on return from this routine, dst will have bits 31, 33, 35, 37 and 39 set. When bit 0 is set in orig, it means turn on the bit in dst corresponding to whatever is the first bit (if any) that is turned on in relmap. Since bit 0 was off in the above example, we leave off that bit (bit 30) in dst. When bit 1 is set in orig (as in the above example), it means turn on the bit in dst corresponding to whatever is the second bit that is turned on in relmap. The second bit in relmap that was turned on in the above example was bit 31, so we turned on bit 31 in dst. Similarly, we turned on bits 33, 35, 37 and 39 in dst, because they were the 4th, 6th, 8th and 10th set bits set in relmap, and the 4th, 6th, 8th and 10th bits of orig (i.e. bits 3, 5, 7 and 9) were also set. When bit 11 is set in orig, it means turn on the bit in dst corresponding to whatever is the twelfth bit that is turned on in relmap. In the above example, there were only ten bits turned on in relmap (30..39), so that bit 11 was set in orig had no affect on dst. Example [2] for bitmap_fold + bitmap_onto: Let's say relmap has these ten bits set: 40 41 42 43 45 48 53 61 74 95 (for the curious, that's 40 plus the first ten terms of the Fibonacci sequence.) Further lets say we use the following code, invoking bitmap_fold then bitmap_onto, as suggested above to avoid the possitility of an empty dst result: unsigned long *tmp; // a temporary bitmap's bits bitmap_fold(tmp, orig, bitmap_weight(relmap, bits), bits); bitmap_onto(dst, tmp, relmap, bits); Then this table shows what various values of dst would be, for various orig's. I list the zero-based positions of each set bit. The tmp column shows the intermediate result, as computed by using bitmap_fold to fold the orig bitmap modulo ten (the weight of relmap). orig tmp dst 0 0 40 1 1 41 9 9 95 10 0 40 (*) 1 3 5 7 1 3 5 7 41 43 48 61 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 40 41 42 43 45 0 9 18 27 0 9 8 7 40 61 74 95 0 10 20 30 0 40 0 11 22 33 0 1 2 3 40 41 42 43 0 12 24 36 0 2 4 6 40 42 45 53 78 102 211 1 2 8 41 42 74 (*) (*) For these marked lines, if we hadn't first done bitmap_fold into tmp, then the dst result would have been empty. If either of orig or relmap is empty (no set bits), then dst will be returned empty. If (as explained above) the only set bits in orig are in positions m where m >= W, (where W is the weight of relmap) then dst will once again be returned empty. All bits in dst not set by the above rule are cleared. COPYRIGHT
Kernel Hackers Manual 3.10 June 2014 BITMAP_ONTO(9)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:34 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy