Sponsored Content
Special Forums IP Networking bonding without switch link aggregation Post 302324351 by stdout on Wednesday 10th of June 2009 01:45:16 PM
Old 06-10-2009
hi,

wow, this is new Smilie
can i have that balance-alb link? seems interesting.

i'm not clear about this
Quote:
I have tried bonding with balance-rr, balance-alb, but the machines can only receive at 1 Gbps. However, with the bonding, the machines can send to two other machines at 1 Gbps each, totaling 2 Gbps, but each machine can still only receive at 2 Gbps.
is that a typo or perhaps you do have any other idea?
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

Link Aggregation

Hi there I have a requirement to provide failover to our customer boxes in case of interface / switch failure, I have been looking at Solaris Link Aggregation with LACP and I wanted to ask a question Ive seen multiple websites that say the following Does this also mean that if the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: hcclnoodles
2 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Link Aggregation and LACP

Hi there I have a requirement to provide failover to our customer boxes in case of interface / switch failure, I have been looking at Solaris Link Aggregation with LACP and I wanted to ask a question Ive seen multiple websites that say the following Does this also mean that if the... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: hcclnoodles
1 Replies

3. IP Networking

bonding lacp and link aggregation

Hello, I am trying to get clarity on a few things and am looking for some info. In every article I have read about link aggregation and lacp, it can be used combine physical links to create 1 logical link for increased bandwidth. But what it doesn't say is if this is limited by source/dst. ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jaredo
1 Replies

4. HP-UX

Link Aggregation HPUX

Hi, Hoping someone can offer some advice on something i have not dealt with before. We have a server that seems to have some very strange configuration done on it. It has 2 physical NIC's and rather than both be aggregated into LAN900 we have 1 in LAN900 and 1 in LAN901? (See Below)... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Andyp2704
2 Replies

5. Solaris

Link aggregation

Me again :) I'm trying to find a page describing the L2, L3 und L4 modes of dladm. It's nice to read "hashed by ip header", but how should I use that? On the file-server it's ok to have the six interfaces serving six clients each on it's own. But an rsync connection via switch between two... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: PatrickBaer
8 Replies

6. IP Networking

Interface bonding / Link aggregation (Multiple)

Hello, I've been using mode 4 with four slaves, however looking at ifconfig showed that the traffic was not balanced correctly between the interfaces, the outgoing traffic has been alot higher on the last slave. Example: eth0 RX 123.2 GiB TX 22.5 GiB eth1 RX 84.8 GiB TX 8.3 GiB eth2... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: TehOne
3 Replies

7. HP-UX

Break Link Aggregation in HP UX.

Hi, I want to Break the Link Aggregation. My aggregation are lan0+lan1 = lan900. Now I want to break this and put the IP in lan0. But i have cluster environment and this is the main database server. So It need to change in cluster script. But I dont know where I have to change it. Please... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: mkiron
1 Replies

8. Solaris

Link Aggregation without LACP

Hi, I'm not from the Solaris world and some of these things are new to me. Can someone tell me if it is possible to configure link aggregation without using LACP? I am told etherchannel was setup without LACP. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: techy1
3 Replies

9. IP Networking

Link Aggregation

Hi ihave three link of internet and iwant to put one linux front of a firewall that this three linux speard firewall such az load balance and fialover but dont close any port and protocol and only firewall have been internet what way can i use for it ? are there any script and services do that... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: mnnn
0 Replies

10. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

Bonding IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation : Bond showing less than desired throughput

Hi All, I have done IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation bond configuration with name bond0 which has 4 slaves (each 25GB/s) in it on cent os 6.8. Issue i am facing is bonding throughput is only 50GB/s not 100GB/s. below are the configuration files : DEVICE=bond0 IPADDR=xx.xx.xx.xx... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: omkar.jadhav
1 Replies
CheckDigits::MXX_005(3pm)				User Contributed Perl Documentation				 CheckDigits::MXX_005(3pm)

NAME
CheckDigits::MXX_005 - compute check digits for ESR9 (CH) SYNOPSIS
use Algorithm::CheckDigits; $esr = CheckDigits('esr9'); if ($esr->is_valid('123456786')) { # do something } $cn = $esr->complete('12345678'); # $cn = '123456786' $cd = $esr->checkdigit('123456786'); # $cd = '6' $bn = $esr->basenumber('123456786'); # $bn = '12345678' DESCRIPTION
ALGORITHM 1. Digits are processed left to right. For the first digit applies the balance is 0. 2. The new balance is taken from the balance table according to the current balance (row) and the digit (column). 3. The check digit is the difference from the last balance to 10 taken modulo 10. METHODS is_valid($number) Returns true only if $number consists solely of numbers and the last digit is a valid check digit according to the algorithm given above. Returns false otherwise, complete($number) The check digit for $number is computed and concatenated to the end of $number. Returns the complete number with check digit or '' if $number does not consist solely of digits and spaces. basenumber($number) Returns the basenumber of $number if $number has a valid check digit. Return '' otherwise. checkdigit($number) Returns the checkdigit of $number if $number has a valid check digit. Return '' otherwise. EXPORT None by default. AUTHOR
Mathias Weidner, <mathias@weidner.in-bad-schmiedeberg.de> SEE ALSO
perl, CheckDigits, www.pruefziffernberechnung.de. perl v5.10.0 2008-05-17 CheckDigits::MXX_005(3pm)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:55 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy