|
|
Sponsored Content
Special Forums
IP Networking
bonding without switch link aggregation
Post 302324351 by stdout on Wednesday 10th of June 2009 01:45:16 PM
06-10-2009
hi,
wow, this is new
can i have that balance-alb link? seems interesting.
i'm not clear about this
is that a typo or perhaps you do have any other idea?
wow, this is new
can i have that balance-alb link? seems interesting.
i'm not clear about this
Quote:
I have tried bonding with balance-rr, balance-alb, but the machines can only receive at 1 Gbps. However, with the bonding, the machines can send to two other machines at 1 Gbps each, totaling 2 Gbps, but each machine can still only receive at 2 Gbps.
|
|
10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Solaris
Hi there
I have a requirement to provide failover to our customer boxes in case of interface / switch failure, I have been looking at Solaris Link Aggregation with LACP and I wanted to ask a question
Ive seen multiple websites that say the following
Does this also mean that if the... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: hcclnoodles
2 Replies
2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hi there
I have a requirement to provide failover to our customer boxes in case of interface / switch failure, I have been looking at Solaris Link Aggregation with LACP and I wanted to ask a question
Ive seen multiple websites that say the following
Does this also mean that if the... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: hcclnoodles
1 Replies
3. IP Networking
Hello, I am trying to get clarity on a few things and am looking for some info.
In every article I have read about link aggregation and lacp, it can be used combine physical links to create 1 logical link for increased bandwidth.
But what it doesn't say is if this is limited by source/dst. ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: jaredo
1 Replies
4. HP-UX
Hi,
Hoping someone can offer some advice on something i have not dealt with before.
We have a server that seems to have some very strange configuration done on it. It has 2 physical NIC's and rather than both be aggregated into LAN900 we have 1 in LAN900 and 1 in LAN901? (See Below)... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Andyp2704
2 Replies
5. Solaris
Me again :)
I'm trying to find a page describing the L2, L3 und L4 modes of dladm.
It's nice to read "hashed by ip header", but how should I use that?
On the file-server it's ok to have the six interfaces serving six clients each on it's own. But an rsync connection via switch between two... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: PatrickBaer
8 Replies
6. IP Networking
Hello,
I've been using mode 4 with four slaves, however looking at ifconfig showed that the traffic was not balanced correctly between the interfaces, the outgoing traffic has been alot higher on the last slave.
Example:
eth0 RX 123.2 GiB TX 22.5 GiB
eth1 RX 84.8 GiB TX 8.3 GiB
eth2... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: TehOne
3 Replies
7. HP-UX
Hi,
I want to Break the Link Aggregation. My aggregation are lan0+lan1 = lan900.
Now I want to break this and put the IP in lan0. But i have cluster environment and this is the main database server.
So It need to change in cluster script.
But I dont know where I have to change it.
Please... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: mkiron
1 Replies
8. Solaris
Hi,
I'm not from the Solaris world and some of these things are new to me. Can someone tell me if it is possible to configure link aggregation without using LACP?
I am told etherchannel was setup without LACP. (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: techy1
3 Replies
9. IP Networking
Hi
ihave three link of internet and iwant to put one linux front of a firewall that this three linux speard firewall such az load balance and fialover but dont close any port and protocol and only firewall have been internet what way can i use for it ?
are there any script and services do that... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: mnnn
0 Replies
10. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Hi All,
I have done IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation bond configuration with name bond0 which has 4 slaves (each 25GB/s) in it on cent os 6.8. Issue i am facing is bonding throughput is only 50GB/s not 100GB/s. below are the configuration files :
DEVICE=bond0
IPADDR=xx.xx.xx.xx... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: omkar.jadhav
1 Replies
LEARN ABOUT REDHAT
rwho
RWHO(1) BSD General Commands Manual RWHO(1) NAME
rwho -- who is logged in on local machines SYNOPSIS
rwho [-a] DESCRIPTION
The rwho command produces output similar to who, but for all machines on the local network. If no report has been received from a machine for 11 minutes then rwho assumes the machine is down, and does not report users last known to be logged into that machine. If a users hasn't typed to the system for a minute or more, then rwho reports this idle time. If a user hasn't typed to the system for an hour or more, then the user will be omitted from the output of rwho unless the -a flag is given. FILES
/var/spool/rwho/whod.* information about other machines SEE ALSO
finger(1), rup(1), ruptime(1), rusers(1), who(1), rwhod(8) HISTORY
The rwho command appeared in 4.3BSD. BUGS
This is unwieldy when the number of machines on the local net is large. Linux NetKit (0.17) August 15, 1999 Linux NetKit (0.17)